Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach network-exposed RRAS service
-
DeliverySend crafted malformed packet
-
ExploitTrigger heap buffer overflow (CWE-122)
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary code on host
-
ImpactGain full control of victim machine
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) role must be installed and enabled on the target host, and its network listener must be reachable by the attacker - RRAS is NOT enabled by default on Windows, which is the primary factor limiting real-world exposure to hosts acting as VPN/routing/dial-up gateways. Where RRAS is running and network-exposed, no further conditions apply: per CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N exploitation is remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity, and requires no user interaction. Affected builds span Windows 10/11 (multiple versions) and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 below the patched build numbers listed in EUVD-2026-99519; fully patched builds are not vulnerable. |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority vulnerability, though the signals are mixed and warrant nuance. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes the worst case: network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated, no user interaction, with total (C:H/I:H/A:H) impact via a CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow - consistent with a 9.8 CRITICAL. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces urgency on impact (Technical Impact: total) and Automatable: yes, meaning the attack can be reliably scripted/wormable. However, SSVC Exploitation is 'none' and there is no CISA KEV listing and no identified public exploit code, so the threat today is potential rather than observed. No EPSS score was provided, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be factored in - this is a real gap. The key limiting factor NOT reflected in the CVSS score is that RRAS is an optional Windows role that is not enabled by default; the 9.8 applies only where RRAS is deployed and network-exposed. Net: treat as a priority patch for any host running RRAS (especially internet-facing VPN/routing gateways), but the ubiquitous-on-paper CVSS overstates exposure for the typical Windows estate where RRAS is absent. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who can reach the RRAS service over the network (e.g., an internet-facing VPN/routing gateway) sends a crafted packet that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow in the RRAS parsing code, corrupting heap memory to achieve remote code execution without authentication or user interaction. Per CVSS AC:L this requires no special timing or conditions once the service is reachable. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so weaponization effort currently rests with the attacker. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Unauthenticated remote code execution in the Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows a network attacker to run arbitrary code in the context of the RRAS service on any host where the RRAS role is installed and its listener is reachable, yielding full compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability (CVSS 9.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, CWE-122 heap overflow, with an authentication-bypass component implied by the pre-auth reachability of the flaw). Exposure is severely gated by configuration rather than by exploit difficulty: RRAS is not enabled by default on Windows, so only machines acting as VPN, dial-up or routing gateways - across Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 builds older than the patched build numbers - are realistically at risk. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA SSVC records Exploitation: none alongside Automatable: yes and Technical Impact: total, and Microsoft has released fixes, so this should be treated as a high-priority patch item rather than an active emergency.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches are available from Microsoft: apply the current cumulative update for each affected platform through the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85809, targeting at minimum build 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.26100.33650 for Server 2025, 10.0.26100.9711 / 10.0.26200.9711 / 10.0.26300.9711 / 10.0.22631.7652 / 10.0.28000.3231 for the respective Windows 11 releases, and 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 and 2012 R2 (Server Core media included). Where patching cannot be immediate, the highest-value compensating control is reduction of attack surface: if the host does not genuinely need to terminate VPN, dial-up or routed connections, remove the Routing and Remote Access role or stop and disable the RemoteAccess service, accepting that remote access and routing functions it provided will cease; if RRAS must stay online, place host firewall rules that permit inbound traffic only from trusted client subnets and management networks rather than the internet or any untrusted segment, restricting the L2TP (UDP 1701), PPTP (TCP 1723), SSTP (TCP 443), IKEv2 (UDP 500/4500) and RRAS RPC management ports, with the trade-off that roaming or third-party VPN clients outside the allow-list will lose connectivity. Third-party compensating controls such as network IPS signatures against malformed RRAS negotiation traffic can add interim coverage but should be assumed bypassable and must not substitute for the vendor fix; there is no configuration flag that disables only the vulnerable code path, so patching or role removal remains the only complete remediation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the Windows Routing and Remote Access Service, the svchost-hosted component that implements Microsoft's built-in multi-protocol router, VPN server (PPTP, L2TP/IPsec, SSTP, IKEv2) and dial-up/remote-access stack, together with the RPC-based management surface used by the RRAS MMC snap-in. CWE-122 describes a write past the end of a heap-allocated buffer, typically caused by a missing or incorrect length check when copying attacker-controlled data - here likely a length field or protocol element parsed from a network packet that is trusted without validation against the destination allocation. Because the overflow lands in heap memory rather than the stack, exploitation usually requires corrupting adjacent chunk metadata or an in-heap function pointer to redirect execution, which is why the impact is scored as total (C:H/I:H/A:H) but also why a working exploit is not automatic. The pre-authentication posture - PR:N/UI:N in both the NVD and independent assessments - indicates the vulnerable parsing path is reached during protocol negotiation before any credential check, which matches the Authentication Bypass tag in the source metadata and means no valid VPN credentials or domain account are needed. No CPE identifiers were supplied in the intelligence feed, so exact platform coverage must be read from the EUVD build ranges rather than from CPE strings. Independent assessment emphasises that the RRAS role must be installed, enabled and network-reachable for the bug to be exploitable at all, and that fully patched builds are not affected; that deployment precondition, not any inherent exploit complexity, is the dominant real-world risk limiter.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
RRAS is a network-listening service exploitable unauthenticated once enabled (AV:N/PR:N/AC:L/UI:N); heap overflow yields code execution with full C/I/A impact on the same host (S:U).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Remote Code Execution in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows attacker to gain an unauthorized access to victim's machine
Executive ViewAI
A critical pre-authentication remote code execution flaw in the Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows any network-reachable attacker to take full control of affected hosts, with complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The exposure is limited to Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 systems that have the RRAS role explicitly installed and its listener reachable - typically VPN, dial-up, and routing gateways - so organizations running remote-access infrastructure should treat this as a priority remediation item while the broader Windows estate remains largely unaffected. Because no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, leadership has a narrow window to patch internet-facing gateways before exploitation tooling emerges.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99519
GHSA-rw6c-w8vc-9p9j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB