Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessTrick user into running malicious app
-
DeliveryApp runs with normal user privileges
-
ExploitAbuse permissions flaw to bypass restrictions
-
ExecutionRead protected user data
-
ImpactExfiltrate sensitive information locally
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a malicious or compromised application to already be running locally on the macOS host with normal (non-root) user privileges (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N) - there is no remote or network exploitation path. The flaw lets that app circumvent the intended permission restrictions to access protected user data. Exploitation is limited to unpatched systems: macOS Sequoia before 15.8, macOS Tahoe before 26.7, and macOS Golden Gate before 27; the vulnerability is closed by Apple's 'additional restrictions' fix. Primary limiting factor is the local prerequisite - the attacker must first achieve local code execution (e.g., via a downloaded/sideloaded app), so this is best treated as a post-compromise data-access primitive rather than an initial-access vector. |
| Impact | This is a low-to-moderate priority issue despite its 5.5 (Medium) CVSS score. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) is internally consistent and confidentiality-only: an already-installed, low-privilege local app gains access to protected user data, with no integrity or availability impact. All exploitation signals point the same direction and reinforce low urgency: EPSS is 0.17% (6th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC is referenced. The local attack vector (AV:L) is the dominant risk-limiting factor - this is not remotely reachable and requires code already running on the device. One labeling mismatch to note: the CWE is CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) and the tag reads 'Privilege Escalation,' but the vector shows confidentiality-only impact (C:H, I:N, A:N) with no scope change, so the real-world effect is unauthorized access to protected data rather than gaining elevated execution privileges - treat this as an information-disclosure/access-control flaw. No signals conflict with the CVSS local classification; the description ('An app may be able to access protected user data') aligns with AV:L/PR:L. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A user installs or is tricked into running a malicious or trojanized app on macOS. Because of the permissions flaw, that low-privilege app bypasses the intended access restrictions and reads protected user data (e.g., data normally gated behind TCC/permission prompts) without further authorization. No public exploit code is identified, and the attack requires the app to already be executing locally on the target Mac. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 17, 2026
Protection-bypass in Apple macOS allows a malicious or compromised app already running with normal (non-root) user privileges to circumvent intended permission restrictions and read protected user data; the flaw affects macOS Sequoia before 15.8, macOS Tahoe before 26.7, and macOS Golden Gate before 27. Exploitation is strictly local (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N) - there is no remote or network path - so the attacker must first obtain local code execution, for example through a downloaded or sideloaded application, making this a post-compromise data-access primitive rather than an initial-access vector, with the confidentiality impact rated High while integrity and availability are unaffected. Apple has released fixes (patch available), and at time of analysis there is no public exploit identified and no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV not listed); EPSS is only 0.17% (6th percentile), so this is a low-to-moderate priority issue despite its 5.5 (Medium) CVSS score.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor-released patch: update macOS Sequoia to 15.8, macOS Tahoe to 26.7, or macOS Golden Gate to 27 as applicable, following the Apple advisories at https://support.apple.com/en-us/149035, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149042, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149043. Because exploitation requires a locally running, low-privileged app, the highest-value compensating controls target local code execution: enforce Gatekeeper and managed app-installation policy so only notarized, MDM-approved applications launch, and restrict sideloading - the trade-off is reduced flexibility for developers and internal tooling that rely on unsigned or ad-hoc builds. Operate users as standard (non-admin) accounts and use separate admin credentials for elevation, which limits what a compromised app inherits but does not by itself block this permission bypass since PR:L is sufficient. Harden against the prerequisite local-execution step with endpoint detection and application allowlisting, and monitor for anomalous reads of protected user data (TCC-protected paths, Keychain-adjacent stores) as a detection compensating control; these measures reduce likelihood and improve detection but do not close the underlying permission gap, so patching remains the only complete fix. Given EPSS of 0.17% (6th percentile), no public exploit identified, and no KEV listing, emergency offline mitigation is not warranted - schedule the update through normal patch cycles with priority for systems where untrusted applications are routinely run.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is rooted in CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management): macOS permission controls and the protected-user-data access model enforce restrictions on what a sandboxed or normally-privileged application may read, and CVE-2026-84587 describes a gap in those restrictions that lets an app obtain data it should have been denied. Apple's description states the problem was 'addressed with additional restrictions', indicating the fix tightens the checks applied to an app's access requests rather than correcting a memory-safety defect. Per the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N), the attack requires local access with low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction (UI:N), yields a Scope-Unchanged confidentiality-only impact, and provides no elevation path beyond the data exposure - the app does not gain root, it simply evades the guard rail protecting user data. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:apple:macos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms macOS as the affected platform, with EUVD enumerating the vulnerable ranges as macOS 0 <27, 0 <26.7, and 0 <15.8, matching the three fixed branches (Golden Gate 27, Tahoe 26.7, Sequoia 15.8).
Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local malicious app (AV:L) with existing low user privileges (PR:L) bypasses permission checks to read protected data; confidentiality-only impact (C:H, I:N, A:N), no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to access protected user data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope
Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe
Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV
The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent
In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth
This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i
A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
EUVD-2026-77877
GHSA-gjph-289h-g769
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB