Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to Guardium with policy-edit rights
-
DeliveryInject OS command metacharacters into policy alert text
-
ExploitPolicy rule fires and triggers SNMP alert
-
ExecutionSNMP alerter service executes injected text as root
-
ImpactFull root compromise of appliance
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated account that can create or modify the alert text of a Guardium security policy, AND the SNMP alert notification feature must be configured/enabled so that the root-privileged SNMP alerter service processes the attacker-supplied alert text. Limiting factors: the attacker needs valid credentials with policy-authoring capability (not a default anonymous path), the targeted deployment must use SNMP alerting, and the product is a specialized enterprise appliance rather than internet-facing commodity software. These conditions mean exploitation is gated behind privileged internal access rather than opportunistic remote scanning. |
| Impact | This is a credible, high-impact issue but not an emergency. The vendor-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 8.8) reflects network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation requiring some authentication, yielding total compromise because the injected commands execute as root via the SNMP alerter service - consistent with SSVC Technical Impact: 'total'. However, multiple non-CVSS signals temper urgency: SSVC lists Exploitation as 'none' (no observed exploitation) and Automatable as 'no' (the attacker must first obtain authenticated access and influence policy alert text, which is not a mass-scannable condition), and EPSS is only 0.67% (50th percentile), indicating modest predicted exploitation probability. The CVE is NOT in CISA KEV and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. One caveat worth verifying: although PR:L is vendor-assigned, the prerequisite of 'influencing policy alert text' typically implies Guardium policy-authoring rights, which are a privileged administrative function - real-world privilege required may be closer to PR:H than the vector suggests. Net: a genuine root-RCE requiring authenticated, policy-privileged access to a specialized security appliance - patch on a prioritized but not drop-everything timeline. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated user with the ability to create or edit Guardium security policies embeds shell command-substitution or metacharacters into the alert text of a policy rule. When the rule fires and the SNMP alert notification is generated, the root-privileged SNMP alerter service passes the attacker-controlled text to the OS, executing the embedded commands as root and giving full control of the Guardium appliance. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Oct 01, 2026
Command injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an authenticated attacker who can influence security policy alert text execute arbitrary operating system commands with root privileges through the SNMP alert notification functionality. Exploitation is gated behind valid credentials with policy-authoring capability and requires that the deployment actually uses SNMP alerting, so this is a privileged-insider or compromised-account risk rather than an opportunistic remote attack; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records no known exploitation. IBM has published a vendor patch, and the EPSS score is low (0.67%, ~50th percentile), consistent with a credible high-impact issue that is not an emergency.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Command injection in the SNMP alert notification functionality of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an authenticated attacker who can influence or edit policy alert text to have attacker-controlled data executed as operating system commands by the SNMP alerter service, which runs with root privileges. Successful exploitation yields full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) consistent with the CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U vector; the attack is network-reachable but requires valid credentials plus a policy-editing or alert-influencing privilege, and the high attack complexity reflects the need to both control alert content and cause the alert to fire while SNMP alerting is configured and in use. This makes it primarily a post-authentication privilege-escalation and insider risk vector rather than a drive-by remote exploit; there is no confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) status and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. A vendor patch is available per IBM's advisory.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor patch for IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 as described in IBM's advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7288035 (patch status: available per vendor advisory; an exact fixed build number was not specified in the available data, so confirm the target release with IBM support before upgrading). Until patching is complete, the most effective compensating control is to disable the SNMP alert notification feature if it is not operationally required, accepting the trade-off that you lose SNMP-based alerting and must rely on the Guardium UI, syslog, or email notification channels instead. Tighten policy-authoring privileges so that only a minimal set of trusted administrators can create or edit policy alert text, since the injection requires that capability; this reduces the attack surface but adds administrative overhead and does not remove the flaw. Restrict network access to the SNMP service (UDP/TCP 161 and 162) to trusted management hosts via firewall or appliance ACLs, remembering that this limits monitoring reach for legitimate SNMP consumers. Where feasible, run the alerter with reduced privileges rather than root to blunt post-exploitation impact, though this may break functionality and is not a substitute for the vendor fix. Finally, monitor alerter and audit logs for unexpected shell metacharacters or child processes spawned by the SNMP alerter service to detect attempted abuse.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a classic OS command injection (CWE-78) in the SNMP alert notification path of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, a specialized enterprise data-activity-monitoring (DAM) appliance. Instead of passing attacker-influenced policy alert text through a safe API, the SNMP alerter service interpolates that text into a shell context, so shell metacharacters embedded in alert content are interpreted as commands. Because the alerter runs as root, successful injection yields full control of the underlying operating system. The affected-product CPE (cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is version-agnostic, with the EUVD advisory narrowing the impacted release to 12.2. The CVSS:3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H reflects a network-reachable attack with low complexity that requires low privileges and no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, matching the assessment that a policy-authoring account is the prerequisite. CISA's SSVC decision data rates technical impact as total but exploitation as none and automatable as no, reinforcing that the barrier is the credential and configuration prerequisite rather than exploitation complexity.
Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable management interface and low attack complexity; PR:L for authenticated policy influence (arguably PR:H since policy editing is privileged); root execution gives full C/I/A.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the SNMP alert notification functionality. An authenticated attacker who can influence policy alert text can cause attacker-controlled data to be executed as operating system commands by the SNMP alerter service, which runs with root privileges.
Executive ViewAI
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, a platform many organizations rely on to monitor and audit database activity, contains a command-injection flaw that can yield root-level control of the appliance. The exposure is concentrated rather than broad: it requires an account already trusted to author security policies combined with an environment actively using SNMP alert notifications, pointing to insider misuse or a compromised administrative credential as the realistic threat path. Leadership should care because root access to a data-security monitoring system can be used to disable controls or alter audit records, undermining the integrity of the very evidence used for compliance and incident response.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
More in Guardium Data Protection
View allSQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma
Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang
Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r
Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app
Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers
Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2
Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac
Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen
Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent
Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c
A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u
Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL
EUVD-2026-89192
GHSA-42cr-f7jq-5689
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB