Skip to main content

Manacle ERP CVE-2026-84148

| EUVDEUVD-2026-69057 CRITICAL
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639)
2026-09-01 CERT-In GHSA-9v85-v56p-73xm
9.2
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: CERT-In
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify internet-reachable ERP API
  2. Delivery
    Locate object-ID parameter in request
  3. Exploit
    Tamper/enumerate identifier values
  4. Execution
    Retrieve other users' and tenants' records
  5. Impact
    Exfiltrate sensitive data at scale

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Object-level authorization, IDOR prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target Manacle Multi-Tenant ERP instance expose the affected API endpoint to the attacker over the network (internet-facing or otherwise reachable). The specific prerequisite is a request to the vulnerable API endpoint with an attacker-controlled object/user identifier parameter - the CVE describes 'manipulating parameter' to reach data 'belonging to other users,' which is the concrete condition. Per CVSS 4.0 PR:N/UI:N/AC:L/AT:N there are no authentication, user-interaction, or special-configuration requirements, so default multi-tenant deployments are exploitable. The main limiting factor is network reachability: an instance restricted to internal networks or behind a VPN/allowlist materially reduces exposure, and the impact is confined to confidentiality (data disclosure) - the attacker cannot modify data or affect availability through this flaw.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority issue rather than a high-score-but-low-impact finding. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.2 (Critical) with the most dangerous exposure profile - network attack vector, low complexity, no attack requirements, and crucially no privileges and no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) - meaning any remote, unauthenticated party can attempt it against an internet-reachable instance. Impact is confidentiality-only (VC:H, SC:H; integrity and availability N), so it is a data-breach risk, not code execution or takeover, but the subsequent-system confidentiality impact signals cross-tenant leakage that is severe for a SaaS ERP holding financial, HR, and customer records. EPSS is not provided, KEV status is negative, and no POC is referenced, so there is no evidence of active or automated exploitation yet - however, IDOR flaws are trivially automatable once discovered, so the low friction of exploitation should weigh more heavily than the current absence of a published exploit. Any organization running an exposed Manacle Multi-Tenant ERP instance should treat this as urgent and prioritize remediation regardless of the missing EPSS/KEV signals.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker discovers the ERP's public API endpoint and observes that a record or user identifier is passed as a request parameter. By incrementing or substituting that identifier, they retrieve profile, financial, or business records belonging to other users and - in the multi-tenant deployment - other tenant organizations, then script the request to harvest data at scale. Given AV:N/AC:L/PR:N, this requires only HTTP access and basic parameter tampering; no public POC is currently referenced.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 01, 2026

Sensitive-data exposure in Manacle Technologies' Multi-Tenant ERP System allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read other users' data by manipulating a parameter on a vulnerable API endpoint. The flaw stems from missing authorization checks (IDOR) on an endpoint reachable without credentials, and in a multi-tenant deployment it can enable cross-tenant data access. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; it was reported by CERT-In (CIVN-2026-0430).

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so confirm the fixed release directly with Manacle Technologies and consult the CERT-In advisory at https://www.cert-in.org.in/s2cMainServlet?pageid=PUBVLNOTES01&VLCODE=CIVN-2026-0430 for vendor guidance. As compensating controls until a patch is applied: restrict the vulnerable API endpoint to authenticated sessions and enforce server-side authorization that ties each object identifier to the requesting user's tenant and account (the definitive fix for IDOR), which requires a code/config change from the vendor; place the application behind a WAF or API gateway with rules to detect and block sequential or out-of-range identifier enumeration, accepting that determined attackers may evade signature-based rules; limit network exposure by placing the ERP behind a VPN or IP allowlist so it is not reachable by anonymous internet clients, at the cost of remote user convenience; and enable detailed access logging on the endpoint to detect enumeration attempts. Replacing predictable sequential identifiers with unguessable random tokens reduces enumeration but is a vendor-side change and is not a substitute for proper authorization checks.

Affected VersionsENISA

Multi-tenant ERP System version

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected software is Manacle Technologies' multi-tenant ERP platform (cpe:2.3:a:manacle_technologies:multi-tenant_erp_system), a hosted enterprise-resource-planning application serving multiple tenant organizations from shared infrastructure. The root cause is CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key), commonly known as an Insecure Direct Object Reference: the API endpoint trusts a client-supplied identifier (such as a user, record, or tenant ID) to select the returned object without verifying that the requester is entitled to it. Because the endpoint also lacks authentication enforcement, an attacker can enumerate or alter that key to retrieve records belonging to arbitrary users or tenants. The CVSS 4.0 subsequent-system confidentiality metric (SC:H) reflects the multi-tenant blast radius, where one tenant's request can disclose another tenant's data.

Know when Multi Tenant Erp System gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (CERT-In) PRIMARY 9.2 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.6 HIGH

Unauthenticated remote IDOR (PR:N/UI:N/AC:L) causing cross-tenant data disclosure warrants S:C and C:H, with no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (CERT-In).

CVSS VectorVendor: CERT-In

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to improper authentication and authorization controls in the API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameter which could lead to exposure of sensitive information belonging to other users on the targeted system.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Manacle Technologies' Multi-Tenant ERP System contains a critical flaw allowing attackers to read sensitive data across organizational boundaries without authentication, exploiting missing authorization checks on an API endpoint. Organizations using this platform face immediate risk of unauthorized data access, regulatory exposure, and potential breach notification obligations.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict API endpoint access via network controls (WAF, API gateway rate limiting, IP whitelisting); implement request-level logging and alerting for suspicious parameter manipulation; contact Manacle Technologies directly for recommended compensating controls and patch availability timeline; consider temporary API access restrictions or blocking if risk cannot be adequately mitigated through access controls.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 68% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche regional ERP vendor, limited enterprise deployment footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy