Skip to main content

Secure Connect Gateway CVE-2026-79970

| EUVDEUVD-2026-74852 MEDIUM
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-09-09 dell GHSA-49v6-v34q-p4w7
5.6
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: dell
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify exposed SCG 5.0 management interface
  2. Delivery
    Analyze JWT token format and algorithm
  3. Exploit
    Craft forged token exploiting signature bypass
  4. Execution
    Submit forged token to authenticated endpoint
  5. Persist
    Bypass protection mechanism
  6. Impact
    Achieve unauthorized access

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
Exploitation Conditions

Network-accessible Dell SCG 5.0 management or API interface is reachable by the attacker. No authentication is required (PR:N per CVSS). AC:H indicates specific technical preconditions must be met - consistent with JWT attacks that require knowledge of the token format, algorithm in use, and ability to craft a specifically malformed or algorithm-confused token; this is not a trivial one-packet exploit. The vulnerability is present in default deployments of affected versions; no special non-default configuration is explicitly required per the description. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the high attack complexity requiring cryptographic knowledge and specific token crafting, (2) network reachability to the SCG interface which is typically restricted to internal/administrative networks in well-configured environments, and (3) the requirement to understand the product's JWT structure and accepted algorithms.

Impact

The vendor-supplied CVSS score of 5.6 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) reflects the high attack complexity inherent in exploiting a cryptographic signature flaw - typically requiring algorithm confusion, key confusion, or similar preconditions that are non-trivial to meet remotely. However, the Authentication Bypass and Jwt Attack tags suggest the real-world consequence of a successful exploit - forged tokens granting unauthorized access - is likely more severe than the C:L/I:L/A:L impact metrics convey; JWT-based authentication bypasses commonly yield broader system access proportional to the privileges the forged token asserts. No CISA KEV listing and no confirmed proof-of-concept exploit were present in the provided intelligence, indicating this has not yet attracted opportunistic mass exploitation. EPSS data was not supplied, leaving probabilistic exploitation likelihood unquantified. Even a mid-sized enterprise IT team in ustka managing Dell SCG appliances should treat this as a structured remediation priority rather than a deferred one, given that the unauthenticated network attack vector removes the need for any initial credential foothold, and the authentication bypass potential significantly amplifies post-exploitation reach if complexity is overcome.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated remote attacker identifies a publicly reachable Dell SCG 5.0 management interface and crafts a forged JWT - for example by exploiting an algorithm confusion weakness (substituting RS256 with HS256 using the public key as the HMAC secret) - that the server accepts as valid due to improper signature verification. The attacker submits the forged token to an authenticated API endpoint, bypassing access controls and gaining unauthorized access to SCG functionality. No public proof-of-concept has been confirmed at time of analysis, but the CWE-347/JWT combination represents a well-understood attack class with established tooling.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 09, 2026

JWT signature verification bypass in Dell Secure Connect Gateway 5.0 enables remote unauthenticated attackers to forge or tamper with cryptographically signed tokens, bypassing the product's authentication protection mechanisms. Both the Appliance variant (versions prior to 5.36.00.16) and Application variant (versions prior to 5.36.00.00) are affected. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; Dell has released patches under advisory DSA-2026-382.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Dell Secure Connect Gateway 5.0 - Appliance to version 5.36.00.16 or later, and Dell Secure Connect Gateway 5.0 - Application to version 5.36.00.00 or later, as specified in Dell advisory DSA-2026-382 (https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-in/000503426/dsa-2026-382-security-update-for-dell-secure-connect-gateway-virtual-edition-multiple-vulnerabilities). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network-level access to the SCG management interface using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure to trusted administrative networks only; this does not eliminate the vulnerability but reduces the attacker pool. Additionally, review SCG access logs for anomalous token-based authentication events that could indicate pre-patch exploitation attempts.

Affected VersionsENISA

Secure Connect Gateway 5.0 - Appliance 0 <5.36.00.16 or later
Secure Connect Gateway 5.0 - Application 0 <5.36.00.00 or later

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 is an enterprise remote support and diagnostics gateway product offered in both a virtual appliance and software application form factor. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature), and the 'Jwt Attack' tag in the metadata strongly indicates the flaw resides in the product's JSON Web Token handling pipeline. CWE-347 covers scenarios such as algorithm confusion attacks (e.g., accepting 'none' algorithm or switching RS256 to HS256), missing signature validation, or acceptance of tokens with invalid or weak signatures. Affected CPEs are cpe:2.3:a:dell:secure_connect_gateway_5.0_-_application and cpe:2.3:a:dell:secure_connect_gateway_5.0_-_appliance. The vulnerability allows forged tokens to be accepted as legitimate, undermining the cryptographic assurance that underpins the product's access control.

Know when Jwt Attack gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (dell) PRIMARY 5.6 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
vuln.today AI 7.7 HIGH

JWT forgery enabling authentication bypass warrants C:H/I:H; AC:H retained as cryptographic exploitation requires non-trivial preconditions.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (dell).

CVSS VectorVendor: dell

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Sep 09, 2026 - 12:03 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to protection mechanism bypass.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise Dell support gateway, common in large Dell infrastructure shops
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2013-3900 MEDIUM
5.5 Dec 11

Why is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update

CVE-2026-48558 CRITICAL POC
9.5 Jun 12

Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2026-5430 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Aug 06

Authentication bypass in WSO2 API Manager and related components (Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, API Control Plane,

CVE-2025-59718 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 09

Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to

CVE-2025-25291 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2026-47304 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 14

Security feature bypass in Microsoft .NET (shipped via Visual Studio 2022 17.12/17.14 and Visual Studio 2026 18.7) lets

CVE-2025-25292 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2022-25898 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 01

The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT

CVE-2026-107722 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 08

Authentication and authorization bypass in fast-jwt 6.2.0 through 6.2.4 (npm, NearForm) lets a remote, unauthenticated a

CVE-2024-42004 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti

CVE-2024-41145 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27

CVE-2024-41138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy