Skip to main content

ClearPass OnGuard CVE-2026-79812

| EUVDEUVD-2026-93898 MEDIUM
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)
2026-10-06 security-alert@hpe.com GHSA-3ggv-65jm-xp4r
6.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain authenticated local access to endpoint
  2. Exploit
    Interact with OnGuard agent service
  3. Execution
    Trigger denial-of-service condition
  4. Impact
    Interrupt agent operation and posture checks

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires local access to a host running the HPE ClearPass OnGuard agent plus a valid low-privilege authenticated session (PR:L), with no user interaction needed (UI:N). Limiting factors are significant: the flaw cannot be reached over the network (AV:L), so an attacker must already have a foothold or interactive login on the endpoint, and impact is restricted to interrupting the OnGuard agent service on that single host rather than the ClearPass Policy Manager server itself. The description does not name a specific non-default feature or configuration prerequisite, so the condition is presence of the OnGuard agent and local authenticated access.

Impact

This is a moderate-severity, local denial-of-service issue that should be triaged as routine patching rather than an emergency. The vendor-supplied CVSS:3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H, base 6.1) is internally consistent with the description: exploitation requires local access and some level of authentication (PR:L) to interrupt the OnGuard agent service, with high availability impact and no confidentiality impact. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC in the provided data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' All signals point the same direction - low real-world urgency: the local attack vector (AV:L) and authentication requirement (PR:L) sharply limit who can trigger it, and the impact is confined to availability of a single endpoint agent, not code execution or data exposure. One minor inconsistency to verify: the vendor vector lists I:L (low integrity impact) even though the description characterizes the flaw purely as service interruption/DoS; a pure DoS would normally be C:N/I:N/A:H, so the integrity bit is either a conservative rounding by HPE or reflects a secondary effect not detailed in the summary - confirm with the HPE advisory. This is a high-CVSS-relative-to-real-risk scenario where the base score overstates practical danger because it is a locally-scoped, authenticated DoS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has authenticated local access to an endpoint running the HPE ClearPass OnGuard agent (for example a standard logged-in user or a user who has compromised a low-privilege account) triggers the flaw to crash or hang the agent service, disrupting posture assessment and network-access health checks on that host. No public exploit code is identified, and the local, authenticated prerequisite (AV:L/PR:L) means this cannot be driven remotely or at scale.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

Local denial of service in the HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager OnGuard agent lets an authenticated low-privilege user on an affected endpoint interrupt the normal operation of the agent service. Exploitation requires an existing local session on the host running the agent and a valid low-privilege account (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N), and the impact is confined to the OnGuard agent on that single endpoint rather than the ClearPass Policy Manager server itself. There is no confirmation of active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, so this should be triaged as routine patching rather than an emergency; no EPSS score was supplied in the source data.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version could be confirmed from the provided data, so the first step is to obtain the fixed OnGuard agent build from the HPE advisory https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05158en_us&docLocale=en_US and upgrade all endpoints running the agent accordingly; because agent upgrades are typically pushed from ClearPass Policy Manager, validate that the updated agent still satisfies the configured posture policies before broad rollout. Until the upgrade is applied, compensating controls should focus on the required precondition of local low-privilege access: restrict interactive logon rights on endpoints running OnGuard to users who genuinely need them, and remove or disable unnecessary local accounts, accepting that this can disrupt shared-workstation or kiosk workflows. Monitoring is a useful secondary control: alert on unexpected OnGuard agent service stops, crashes, or repeated restarts in endpoint telemetry and correlate them with local logon events, though this detects abuse rather than preventing it and depends on agents or EDR reporting reliably. Where operationally feasible, placing particularly exposed endpoints behind stricter access controls or reducing the number of users with local sessions lowers exposure, at the cost of end-user flexibility. Patching remains the only complete fix, and the HPE advisory should be re-checked for the exact fixed agent version and any vendor-supplied configuration hardening guidance.

Affected VersionsENISA

ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) 6.11.0 ≤6.11.15
ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) 6.14.0 ≤6.14.0

Affected Packages

euvd clearpass_policy_manager_cppm no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is the OnGuard agent, the endpoint-side posture and health-check client that HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager deploys on managed devices to collect compliance data and gate network access. Because the flaw is reached only through local interaction with the agent process on the host (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N, scope unchanged), the attack surface is the agent's local service interface rather than the ClearPass Policy Manager server or its network-facing services. The source data does not include a CWE identifier, so the precise root-cause class is not confirmed; the impact profile (C:N/I:L/A:H under the NVD vector, and C:N/I:N/A:H under our assessed vector) indicates an availability-focused defect, consistent with insufficient validation or error handling in a local interface that terminates or wedges the agent service rather than corrupting data or exposing credentials. The NVD and assessed vectors differ only on integrity impact (I:L versus I:N); both agree that confidentiality is unaffected and availability impact is high.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 6.1 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
vuln.today AI 5.5 MEDIUM

Local authenticated attacker (AV:L/PR:L) crashes the agent for a pure availability loss (A:H); I set I:N because the DoS description shows no integrity impact, unlike the vendor's I:L.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A denial of service vulnerability exists in the OnGuard agent of HPE Networking ClearPass Policy Manager. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated local attacker to interrupt the normal operation of the agent service.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 99% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely-used enterprise NAC endpoint agent, not universally deployed
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy