Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify exposed GCB Doctor host
-
DeliveryRequest residual ADOdb test page
-
ExploitInject shell metacharacters in parameter
-
ExecutionServer executes injected OS command
-
ImpactGain remote code execution on server
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The concrete prerequisite is that the vulnerable, un-removed ADOdb test page ships in the deployed build (any version before 20260621) and is reachable over the network; the attacker sends a crafted value in the specific test-page parameter that is passed to an OS command. Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N), there is no authentication, no user interaction, and no special attacker-side requirement - so against affected builds this is effectively unauthenticated remote exploitation with the only limiting factors being (1) network reachability of the GCB Doctor web interface and (2) the target running a build earlier than 20260621. Instances already updated to 20260621+ or with the test endpoint blocked/removed are not exploitable. |
| Impact | All available signals point to genuine high priority rather than an inflated CVSS number. The CVSS 4.0 vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H describes remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with no user interaction and full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact on the vulnerable system - consistent with the description of unauthenticated remote command execution. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or SSVC decision data was provided in the input, so probabilistic and automatable-exploitation signals cannot be quantified; the absence of a KEV entry means there is no confirmation of active exploitation. No public exploit code was identified either, so the primary risk driver is the intrinsic ease of exploitation (no auth, no special config) combined with the availability of a fix that attackers can diff. Because command injection via a static endpoint is trivially scriptable, real-world risk should be treated as high despite the missing EPSS/KEV data. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker scans for internet-exposed 4MOSAn GCB Doctor instances and requests the leftover ADOdb test page, supplying a parameter value containing an OS command separator followed by their payload (for example a reverse shell or reconnaissance command). Because the endpoint requires no authentication and the parameter is passed to the OS shell, the command executes on the server with the privileges of the web application, giving the attacker a foothold in a single unauthenticated request. No public POC is identified at this time, but the network vector and low attack complexity make weaponization straightforward. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 24, 2026
OS command injection in 4MOSAn GCB Doctor allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via a leftover ADOdb test page whose parameter is passed into a shell context. The vulnerable component is a debug/test artifact (an ADOdb connection test page) that was never removed from production builds, so any internet-reachable instance before build 20260621 is exploitable with a single crafted request. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the CVSS 4.0 base score of 9.3 and the fully unauthenticated network vector make this a high-priority patch.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: upgrade 4MOSAn GCB Doctor to build 20260621 or later, which is the first fixed version according to the EUVD range (fixed at 20260621). Follow the TWCERT/CC advisory at https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-11122-3d95a-2.html for vendor-specific update instructions. If immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to block or remove the residual ADOdb test page - restrict access to the vulnerable diagnostic/test endpoint at the web server or WAF layer (deny requests to the ADOdb test script path), which directly removes the injection surface with minimal functional impact since it is a non-production debug artifact. Additionally restrict network exposure of the GCB Doctor management interface to trusted administrative networks or a VPN, and add WAF rules to block shell metacharacters (;, |, &, `, $()) in the affected parameter; note that metacharacter filtering alone is a weaker control and can be bypassed, so treat it as defense-in-depth rather than a substitute for the patch.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
ADOdb is a widely-used PHP database abstraction library that historically ships with test/diagnostic scripts (e.g. testdatabases-style pages) intended only for development. The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command): a request parameter exposed by this residual ADOdb test page is concatenated into a system-level command invocation without sanitization or safe API use, letting an attacker break out of the intended argument and append their own shell commands. The affected product per CPE is cpe:2.3:a:4mosan_security_technology:4mosan_gcb_doctor:*, a management/monitoring appliance-style application from Taiwanese vendor 4MOSAn Security Technology; the exposure is entirely a function of the shipped debug page rather than any customer configuration.
Know when 4Mosan Gcb Doctor gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Unauthenticated network-reachable test page passes input to the OS shell (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), yielding full RCE and thus high C/I/A on an unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (twcert).
CVSS VectorVendor: twcert
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
4MOSAn GCB Doctor developed by 4MOSAn Security Technology has a OS Command Injection vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can inject malicious commands through an unremoved ADOdb test page parameter, thereby executing arbitrary system commands on the server.
Executive ViewAI
4MOSAn GCB Doctor builds before 20260621 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability via a leftover debug page, exposing any internet-accessible instance to full system compromise. An attacker can execute arbitrary commands without credentials, creating immediate risk to system integrity, data confidentiality, and operational continuity.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
EUVD-2026-64706
GHSA-5jrp-qhfh-7jjg
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB