Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privilege Splunk user
-
DeliveryCraft malicious report notification with injected identifiers
-
ExploitSubmit payload to Splunk Secure Gateway endpoint
-
ExecutionGateway constructs REST API request using system-level session token
-
PersistExtract system-level token from API interaction
-
ImpactModify Splunk platform configuration or exfiltrate all indexed data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must hold any valid Splunk account that does not have the 'admin' or 'power' role - standard analyst, user, or read-only accounts qualify. Splunk Secure Gateway must be installed and operational in the environment; organizations that have not deployed Secure Gateway are not affected by this specific vulnerability. The attacker must be able to reach the Splunk Secure Gateway component over the network and submit report notification data to it. Exploitation is limited by the requirement for a valid authenticated session (PR:L) - unauthenticated external attackers cannot exploit this directly. The attack is further constrained to environments running the affected version ranges across both Splunk Enterprise and Splunk Secure Gateway simultaneously. No special non-default configuration beyond Secure Gateway being present and enabled is required. |
| Impact | The CVSS 8.8 score with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H accurately reflects a network-reachable, low-complexity exploit requiring only a standard (non-privileged) Splunk account - a realistic bar in any enterprise running Splunk with multiple internal users. The S:U (no scope change) designation in the official vector is debatable: the attack crosses component boundaries from Secure Gateway to Splunk Enterprise via a system-level token, which functionally constitutes a scope change; this may cause the official score to understate lateral impact. No CISA KEV listing and no public exploit code have been identified, which reduces immediate mass-exploitation risk. However, the attack is fully internal-user-triggered with low complexity, meaning any malicious or compromised insider account is a viable threat actor. EPSS data was not provided in source intelligence, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be stated numerically. The combination of high CVSS, multi-version breadth across four major Enterprise release trains, and the privileged token extraction primitive makes this a genuine remediation priority rather than a theoretical risk. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a standard, low-privileged Splunk account (no admin or power role required) sends a crafted report notification payload to Splunk Secure Gateway containing manipulated report identifiers. Secure Gateway, without validating these identifiers, constructs a REST API call to Splunk Enterprise using a system-level session token and executes the attacker-controlled request - allowing the attacker to extract the system token and subsequently modify platform-wide configuration or access sensitive indexed data across all Splunk indexes. No public proof-of-concept exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the attack requires only crafted HTTP data and a valid low-privilege credential. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026
Splunk Secure Gateway's failure to validate decoded report notification identifiers enables any authenticated low-privileged user to hijack system-level REST API sessions in Splunk Enterprise, achieving full configuration control and credential theft without requiring admin or power role. Affected versions span multiple Splunk Enterprise branches (9.4.x, 10.0.x, 10.2.x, 10.4.x) and Splunk Secure Gateway branches (3.8.x, 3.9.x, 3.10.x). No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the low-complexity, low-privilege attack path and high-impact outcome (C:H/I:H/A:H) make this a realistic internal threat in any multi-tenant or shared Splunk deployment.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to version 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, or 9.4.14 (matching your current major.minor branch), and upgrade Splunk Secure Gateway to version 3.10.9, 3.9.23, or 3.8.70 accordingly. Both components must be patched, as the vulnerability exists in Secure Gateway's request construction but the privileged token resides in Enterprise. The vendor advisory at https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0801 should be consulted for specific upgrade instructions and any noted caveats. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not feasible, restrict Splunk user accounts to the minimum required: consider disabling Splunk Secure Gateway entirely for deployments that do not rely on mobile or gateway alerting features (note: this will break gateway-dependent workflows). Additionally, audit Splunk REST API access logs for anomalous system-token activity from non-admin sessions. Network-level controls (limiting inbound connections to Splunk's web and API ports to trusted hosts) reduce the attack surface to insider threats only but do not eliminate the vulnerability.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery): Splunk Secure Gateway, a middleware component enabling mobile and alerting integrations, accepts report notification data containing identifiers that it decodes and uses verbatim to construct requests to the Splunk Enterprise REST API - without sanitizing or validating those identifiers first. Because Secure Gateway performs these REST calls using a system-level session token (rather than the initiating user's token), an attacker who can submit crafted notification data can cause Secure Gateway to issue privileged API calls on their behalf. The CPE strings confirm both cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_enterprise and cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_secure_gateway are independently listed as affected, underscoring that the vulnerable code path bridges two distinct Splunk components. The REST API exposure amplifies impact: once a system-level token is obtained, an attacker can query, modify, or extract virtually any configuration object or data index in the platform.
Know when Splunk gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
PR:L confirmed by description; S:C reflects cross-component token hijack from Secure Gateway into Splunk Enterprise system context.
Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).
CVSS VectorVendor: cisco
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.9, 3.9.23, and 3.8.70, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could use crafted report notification data to cause Splunk Secure Gateway to send a request to the Splunk Enterprise Representational State Transfer (REST) API using a system-level session token and modify the Splunk platform configuration. The user could then obtain a session token without a password and use it to access all relevant data and affect system integrity. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Secure Gateway does not validate decoded report notification identifiers before using them to construct requests to the Splunk Enterprise REST API.
Executive ViewAI
Splunk Enterprise (versions 9.4.x-10.4.x) and Splunk Secure Gateway (versions 3.8.x-3.10.x) contain an authentication flaw that allows low-privileged users to seize administrative sessions, potentially compromising all Splunk security data, configurations, and stored credentials. Organizations relying on Splunk for security operations face immediate risk of security control bypass and unauthorized data access.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe
Unauthenticated arbitrary file write in Splunk Enterprise (below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7) and Splunk Cloud Platform (below 10.
curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when
curl < 7.84.0 supports "chained" HTTP compression algorithms, meaning that a serverresponse can be compressed multiple t
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.2.2, 9.1.5, and 9.0.10, a low-privileged user that does not hold the admin or powe
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.0.7 and 9.1.2, Splunk Enterprise does not safely sanitize extensible stylesheet la
In versions of Splunk Enterprise below 9.0.5, 8.2.11, and 8.1.14, and Splunk Cloud Platform below version 9.0.2303.100,
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9, 8.1.12, and 9.0.2, an authenticated user can execute arbitrary code through t
When curl < 7.84.0 saves cookies, alt-svc and hsts data to local files, it makes the operation atomic by finalizing the
SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a
A vulnerability exists in curl <7.87.0 HSTS check that could be bypassed to trick it to keep using HTTP. Rated high seve
When doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data t
EUVD-2026-62916
GHSA-9pvq-j27w-mjfc
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB