Skip to main content

insights-client CVE-2026-71475

| EUVDEUVD-2026-56899 MEDIUM
Path Traversal (CWE-22)
2026-08-11 secalert@redhat.com GHSA-gqvx-3g3q-49g9
6.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Compromise spoke cluster
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious ClusterID with path traversal sequences
  3. Exploit
    Spoke reports tampered ClusterID to hub
  4. Execution
    Hub insights-client builds API URL with unsanitized ClusterID
  5. Persist
    Request routed to unintended API endpoint
  6. Impact
    Hub-authenticated response discloses out-of-scope data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the attacker already controls a spoke (managed cluster) in the targeted multi-cluster Red Hat Insights deployment - specifically, the ability to manipulate the ClusterID value that the spoke reports to the hub. The hub's insights-client must use this attacker-controlled ClusterID directly in constructing API request paths without encoding. Exploitation is limited to deployments using a hub-and-spoke architecture (e.g., Red Hat OpenShift with Advanced Cluster Management); single-node or standalone RHEL Insights deployments where there is no external ClusterID input may not be affected in the same way. The CVSS vector confirms PR:L (low privilege, i.e., authenticated spoke relationship) and UI:N (no additional user interaction required on the hub side). Exploitation cannot occur without prior spoke compromise - this is not an unauthenticated, perimeter-facing attack.

Impact

The NVD-assigned CVSS 3.1 score of 5.0 (Medium) is grounded in a network-reachable, low-complexity attack with low privileges and changed scope, but confidentiality impact is limited (C:L) with no integrity or availability consequences. The Scope:Changed metric appropriately reflects that a compromised spoke can affect the hub-side API behavior. However, the real-world risk is bounded by the prerequisite of spoke compromise - this is not a standalone initial-access vector but rather a post-compromise lateral or privilege-escalation path within an already-breached multi-cluster environment. No EPSS data was provided, but the attack prerequisite (spoke already under adversary control) strongly limits opportunistic exploitation. No KEV listing and no identified POC further reduce urgency. The primary concern is information disclosure - specifically, that authenticated hub requests could reach API endpoints that should be out of scope for a given ClusterID. Defenders in multi-cluster Red Hat environments with strict API segmentation should treat this as a meaningful internal threat, but it is not a perimeter-facing critical issue.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An adversary who has compromised a spoke cluster in a Red Hat multi-cluster Insights deployment modifies the ClusterID value reported by that spoke to include path traversal sequences (e.g., '../../admin/secrets'). When insights-client on the hub constructs the API request URL using this malicious ClusterID, the request is routed to an unintended API endpoint, potentially exposing data or functionality accessible only to hub-internal paths. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified, but the attack primitive - URL path injection via unsanitized input - is well understood and straightforward to implement given spoke-level control.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Path traversal in Red Hat insights-client allows a compromised spoke (managed cluster) to inject unencoded sequences into the Insights API URL path by manipulating the ClusterID value it controls, redirecting authenticated hub-side requests to unintended API endpoints. Affected deployments include any multi-cluster Red Hat Insights configuration where a spoke cluster could be under adversary control. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and this CVE is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the vendor-supplied patch from Red Hat once available; check https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71475 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2512154 for the latest advisory and patched package version, as no specific fixed version was identified in the available intelligence. As a compensating control prior to patching, operators should enforce strict validation and allowlisting of ClusterID values at the hub's API gateway or ingress layer, rejecting any ClusterID containing path separator characters, dot sequences, or percent-encoded variants - note this may require custom WAF rules and could reject legitimately unusual cluster identifiers. Additionally, restricting which API endpoints are reachable from spoke-initiated requests through network policy or RBAC can limit the blast radius of a successful traversal attempt, though this requires careful policy tuning to avoid breaking legitimate Insights telemetry flows.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

insights-client is the Red Hat Insights data collection and reporting agent used in RHEL and OpenShift managed environments. The vulnerability arises from CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory) - the client constructs API request URLs by directly embedding the ClusterID, a value sourced from the spoke cluster, without URL encoding or validation. In a hub-and-spoke architecture (e.g., OpenShift with ACM), each spoke reports its identity via ClusterID. If an adversary controls the spoke, they can craft a ClusterID containing traversal sequences (e.g., '../') or other path components, causing the hub to issue API requests to unintended endpoints. The CVSS Scope:Changed metric confirms the impact extends beyond the vulnerable insights-client component itself to the Insights API infrastructure.

Know when Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.0 MEDIUM

PR:L reflects the required spoke cluster authentication relationship; S:C captures hub API impact beyond the vulnerable client; C:L only, as traversal enables information disclosure without integrity or availability consequences.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 5.0 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
Sep 02, 2026 - 16:22 NVD
5.0 (MEDIUM) 6.8 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in insights-client. A compromised managed cluster, referred to as a 'spoke', can inject unencoded data into the Insights API URL path. This occurs because the ClusterID, which is controlled by the spoke, is used directly in the request path without proper validation or URL encoding. This vulnerability allows a malicious spoke to redirect authenticated requests to unintended API endpoints, potentially leading to information disclosure or unauthorized access.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 80% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise Red Hat/OpenShift multi-cluster deployments only
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:redhat:advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes:2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:redhat:insights-client:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2025-14874 HIGH POC
7.5 Dec 18

Unbounded recursion in Nodemailer's address parser (npm package versions 3.0.0 through 7.0.10) allows a single crafted e

CVE-2023-3027 HIGH
7.8 Jun 05

The grc-policy-propagator allows security escalation within the cluster. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerabil

CVE-2026-71845 HIGH
7.7 Aug 11

Token credential exposure in Red Hat insights-client causes the CCX_TOKEN bearer credential, used exclusively in disconn

CVE-2022-27191 HIGH
7.5 Mar 18

The golang.org/x/crypto/ssh package before 0.0.0-20220314234659-1baeb1ce4c0b for Go allows an attacker to crash a server

CVE-2026-71474 HIGH
7.1 Aug 11

Sensitive credential leakage in Red Hat insights-client exposes cloud.openshift.com pull-secret tokens through applicati

CVE-2022-2238 MEDIUM
6.5 Sep 01

A vulnerability was found in the search-api container in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes when a query

CVE-2020-25655 MEDIUM
6.5 Nov 09

An issue was discovered in ManagedClusterView API, that could allow secrets to be disclosed to users without the correct

CVE-2025-6017 MEDIUM
5.5 Jul 02

A security vulnerability in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (CVSS 5.5) that allows an unprivileged user. Remediation

CVE-2020-25688 LOW
3.5 Nov 23

A flaw was found in rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0. Rated low severity (CVSS 3.5), this vulnerability is l

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy