Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious GFS2 image with oversized inode height
-
DeliveryDeliver image to target system
-
ExploitVictim invokes gfs2-utils tool against image
-
Executionmetawalk.c calls alloca() with untrusted height
-
PersistStack exhausted
-
ImpactProcess crash (denial of service)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource allocation limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that a user or automated process actively invoke a gfs2-utils tool (such as fsck.gfs2 or gfs2_edit) against an attacker-controlled GFS2 filesystem image, satisfying the UI:R user-interaction requirement from the CVSS vector. The attack is local (AV:L) and high-complexity (AC:H) because the attacker must craft a GFS2 image containing a specific malformed inode height field. No special system privileges are required of the attacker (PR:N), but the victim must actively open or scan the crafted image with a gfs2-utils utility. Systems that do not use GFS2, that restrict gfs2-utils to trusted internally generated images, or that do not have gfs2-utils installed are not at practical risk. |
| Impact | With a CVSS base score of 4.7 and vector AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, this vulnerability presents limited real-world risk. The attack is local, requires high complexity (a precisely crafted GFS2 image with a malformed inode height field), and mandates that a user or automated process actively invoke a gfs2-utils tool against the malicious image - making opportunistic or remote exploitation impractical. The impact is confined entirely to availability; there is no confidentiality or integrity exposure. Even a mid-sized municipal IT team in mielec running RHEL cluster nodes with GFS2 would face negligible exploitation likelihood given the absence of any public PoC, EPSS data, or CISA KEV listing. This is a legitimate but operationally low-priority finding that primarily threatens environments where externally sourced or untrusted GFS2 images are routinely processed by utility tools. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a GFS2 filesystem image with a maliciously inflated inode height value embedded in the on-disk metadata and delivers it to a system administrator or automated fsck/backup job. When a gfs2-utils tool (such as fsck.gfs2) processes the image, the alloca() call in metawalk.c exhausts the stack and crashes the process, disrupting filesystem management or cluster maintenance operations. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 03, 2026
Stack exhaustion in gfs2-utils's metawalk.c metadata walk code allows a local attacker to cause denial of service by supplying a crafted GFS2 filesystem image containing a maliciously large inode height value that drives unbounded alloca() calls. Affected systems include Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, 8, and 9 with gfs2-utils installed; the CVSS 4.7 medium rating reflects a local, high-complexity, user-interaction-required attack path with no confidentiality or integrity impact. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Monitor https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71224 and apply updated gfs2-utils packages from Red Hat once released; no specific patched package version is identified in the currently available advisory data. As a compensating control, restrict invocation of gfs2-utils tools (e.g., fsck.gfs2, gfs2_edit) to trusted, internally generated filesystem images only, and prevent unprivileged or external users from supplying GFS2 images to these utilities. Organizations not running GFS2 cluster filesystems should consider removing the gfs2-utils package entirely - this eliminates exposure with no operational impact in non-GFS2 environments. Adding stack size limits (ulimit -s) or using wrapper scripts that validate image provenance before processing can serve as additional compensating controls, though they do not address the root cause.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
gfs2-utils is the userspace utility suite for GFS2 (Global File System 2), Red Hat's shared-disk cluster filesystem. The vulnerable code resides in metawalk.c, which implements metadata traversal over GFS2 on-disk structures. During a metadata walk, the code calls alloca() - a stack-based allocation function - using an inode height value sourced directly from on-disk GFS2 metadata without first validating it against any reasonable bound. CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) precisely describes this root cause: if a crafted filesystem image supplies an artificially large inode height, alloca() attempts to reserve an excessive amount of stack space, exhausting the thread stack and crashing the process. The vulnerability is scoped to gfs2-utils as packaged in RHEL 7, 8, and 9 per CPEs cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7/8/9.
Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Local vector with high complexity and required user interaction matches a crafted-image parsing flaw; purely DoS impact (A:H) with no confidentiality or integrity exposure.
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A stack overflow vulnerability was found in gfs2-utils. The metadata walk code in metawalk.c uses alloca() with an untrusted inode height value from on-disk metadata without bounds validation, causing stack exhaustion and a denial of service when processing crafted GFS2 filesystem images.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
More in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
View allHeap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash
Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h
Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft
Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript
Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity
A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to
The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe
Arbitrary code execution in GIMP's PSD import plugin allows an attacker to run code in the context of the user who opens
Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo
Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter
Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a
A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes
Same technique Denial Of Service
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-70451
GHSA-84xm-vrh2-jhxq
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB