Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Open AF_UNIX sockets via API
  3. Exploit
    Race socket teardown to trigger UAF
  4. Execution
    Spray kernel pool to control freed object
  5. Persist
    Overwrite kernel security structures
  6. Impact
    Execute code at SYSTEM/kernel privilege

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a local authenticated session on the affected Windows host with at least a standard (low-privileged) user account - CVSS PR:L confirms this. The attacker must be able to create AF_UNIX sockets, which requires no special privilege beyond a normal user session on Windows. The high attack complexity (AC:H) indicates that reliable exploitation additionally depends on precise heap-state manipulation or timing, such as a race condition between socket closure and a concurrent I/O operation; this is not trivially reliable and requires attacker-controlled timing. Exploitation cannot be performed remotely without first obtaining local code execution. No special non-default configuration or specific Windows feature enablement beyond the AF_UNIX Socket Provider being present (which it is by default on modern Windows) is required.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H accurately characterises this as a local privilege-escalation flaw requiring a low-privileged account and high attack complexity - the latter almost certainly reflecting a race-condition or heap-grooming requirement typical of UAF exploits. The EPSS signal and KEV status are both absent from the provided data, so real-world exploitation cannot be confirmed. The vendor-confirmed patch and Microsoft's direct report (secure@microsoft.com) establish the flaw as genuine. The high AC:H metric significantly dampens near-term mass exploitation risk: UAF exploits against kernel socket providers require reliable heap manipulation, which is tooling- and environment-dependent. However, the breadth of affected Windows versions (Server 2012 through Server 2025, Windows 10 21H2 through Windows 11 26H1) is exceptionally wide, and any local code execution path - including containerised workloads or shared RDP sessions - represents a viable staging point. The 'Denial Of Service' tag in the metadata is misleading; the described impact is privilege escalation, not denial of service (though UAF exploitation can produce system crashes as a side-effect, explaining A:H).

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged local user logs into a multi-user Windows Server (e.g., via RDP or an application-tier shell) and runs exploit code that opens AF_UNIX sockets and races socket teardown operations to trigger a use-after-free condition in kernel memory. By carefully controlling heap allocations - using techniques such as pool spraying - the attacker places crafted data in the freed kernel object's location, redirecting execution to attacker-controlled code running at kernel privilege. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 09, 2026

Privilege escalation in the Windows AF_UNIX Socket Provider allows a local low-privileged attacker to gain full system-level control via a use-after-free memory corruption flaw. The vulnerability spans virtually all supported and some legacy Windows releases - from Windows Server 2012 through Windows 11 26H1 and Windows Server 2025 - making it extremely broad in scope. No public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the high-complexity local exploitation bar and the completeness of C:H/I:H/A:H CVSS impact make this a meaningful privilege-escalation risk in multi-tenant, shared, or endpoint environments.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for the applicable Windows version as documented in the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70565. The specific patch thresholds are listed per build above; ensure cumulative updates bring the OS build above the stated fixed versions. For Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2, which are past standard support, patch delivery may require an active Extended Security Update (ESU) subscription - organisations without ESU should prioritise migration or network-level isolation. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not possible, restrict local logon access to the affected system to trusted administrative accounts, eliminating the PR:L prerequisite; this does not remove the vulnerability but eliminates the attack surface for unprivileged users. Disabling AF_UNIX socket support is not a documented or straightforward mitigation and may break dependent applications; it is not recommended as a primary compensating control without vendor guidance.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7725
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7582
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9445
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7725
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5622
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9445
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2954
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7725
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7725
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7582
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9445
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9445
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2954
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5622
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33438
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33438

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The AF_UNIX Socket Provider is the Windows kernel subsystem implementing POSIX Unix-domain sockets (AF_UNIX), introduced to Windows 10 and Windows Server 2019 and subsequently backported across older platforms. CWE-416 (Use After Free) describes a class of memory safety flaw in which a code path accesses heap memory after it has been freed, allowing an attacker to influence what data occupies that memory and redirect execution or corrupt privileged kernel structures. In Windows socket providers, AF_UNIX socket objects are managed in kernel-mode; a race condition or improper reference counting during socket teardown or I/O completion could free an in-use object while a concurrent code path still holds a reference. By controlling the replacement allocation, an attacker can subvert kernel control flow or overwrite security-sensitive fields, achieving kernel-mode code execution.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local-only access, low-privileged account required, high complexity for UAF heap manipulation; full C/I/A impact after successful privilege escalation to SYSTEM.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:35 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:20 nvd
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Windows AF_UNIX Socket Provider allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A privilege escalation vulnerability in the Windows AF_UNIX Socket Provider enables local low-privileged users to gain complete system control across all supported Windows releases from Server 2012 through Windows 11 and Server 2025. No public exploit identified at time of analysis. This poses a significant risk to organizations operating multi-tenant systems, shared endpoints, or environments where multiple users have local access, potentially allowing any local account holder to achieve full system compromise.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 83% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows is deployed across the vast majority of enterprise environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy