Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach stunnel SOCKS proxy port
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate as low-privilege SOCKS client
  3. Exploit
    Submit CONNECT request with ::ffff:127.0.0.1
  4. Execution
    Bypass stunnel localhost filter
  5. Persist
    Proxy connection to loopback-only service
  6. Impact
    Read or interact with internal endpoint

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires stunnel to be explicitly configured in SOCKS proxy mode - this is not the default stunnel operating mode and must be deliberately enabled via the 'protocol = socks' directive in the stunnel configuration. The CVSS PR:L metric indicates that the attacker must have low-privilege access to the stunnel SOCKS proxy endpoint (i.e., be a permitted SOCKS client, which may mean simply having network reachability to the port if the SOCKS service has no credential enforcement, or holding valid SOCKS credentials if authentication is configured). No user interaction is required and attack complexity is low once access is obtained. Exploitation is limited to stunnel version 5.79 and earlier. Impact is further bounded by what loopback services exist and are listening on the stunnel host - environments where no sensitive services bind exclusively to 127.0.0.1 face negligible practical risk despite meeting the configuration prerequisite.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4 Medium with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N reflects a network-reachable, low-complexity exploit requiring low-privilege SOCKS client access, with limited confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact. Real-world risk depends heavily on two factors: whether stunnel is deployed in SOCKS proxy mode (a non-default, explicitly configured operating mode) and whether sensitive loopback services co-reside on the stunnel host. In environments where stunnel acts as a hardened gateway with localhost services (e.g., Redis, internal admin APIs, metadata endpoints), this vulnerability materially raises the blast radius. No CISA KEV listing and no public POC reduce urgency, suggesting no active opportunistic exploitation at this time. EPSS data was not provided; given the configuration prerequisite and PR:L requirement, exploitation probability is expected to be low-to-moderate. The absence of a S:C (scope change) in the CVSS vector is consistent - impact is bounded to the stunnel host itself.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with legitimate SOCKS client credentials connects to the exposed stunnel SOCKS proxy port and issues a CONNECT or UDP ASSOCIATE request targeting ::ffff:127.0.0.1 on a privileged port (e.g., port 6379 for Redis or port 8080 for an internal admin console). stunnel's address filter, expecting only dotted-decimal 127.0.0.1 to be blocked, forwards the connection to the loopback interface, granting the attacker access to a service intended to be reachable only from the local host. No public POC exists at time of analysis, but the technique is well-documented in dual-stack SSRF research.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 04, 2026

SSRF bypass in stunnel 5.79 and earlier allows authenticated SOCKS proxy clients to circumvent intended localhost access restrictions by supplying IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (e.g., ::ffff:127.0.0.1) or unspecified addresses (0.0.0.0, ::) in proxy requests. Exploitation reaches loopback-bound services on the stunnel host - services deliberately isolated from external network access - potentially exposing internal APIs, administrative interfaces, or other localhost-only endpoints. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

No explicit patched version number is identified in the available references. Consult the Red Hat Security Advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70367 and Red Hat Bugzilla ticket 2462083 for updated RHEL packages as they become available; RHEL users should apply the relevant errata once released. For upstream stunnel, monitor the official stunnel.org release channel for a version superseding 5.79 that addresses SOCKS address normalization. As a compensating control, disable SOCKS proxy mode in stunnel configurations if it is not operationally required - this fully eliminates the attack surface with no functional impact for non-SOCKS deployments. Where SOCKS mode is necessary, enforce network-layer ACLs to restrict which clients can reach the stunnel SOCKS port, reducing the pool of potential abusers. Additionally, audit and harden loopback-bound services on the stunnel host to require authentication independently, ensuring that even if loopback restrictions are bypassed, the internal services are not trivially accessible.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

stunnel is a widely-deployed SSL/TLS tunneling daemon that can operate as a SOCKS proxy, forwarding client connections to upstream targets while enforcing access policies. The flaw resides in stunnel's SOCKS-mode address validation logic, which fails to normalize or reject alternative representations of the loopback address before applying its localhost restriction. CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) covers this root cause class: the server-side proxy component can be manipulated to initiate connections to unintended internal targets. The dual-stack address ambiguity - where ::ffff:127.0.0.1 is a valid IPv6 representation of 127.0.0.1 but may bypass IPv4-only allow/deny checks, and where 0.0.0.0 or :: resolve to the local stack - is a known pitfall in network address validation. Red Hat reports the issue across stunnel as packaged in RHEL 6 through 10 (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_*), confirming broad distribution-level exposure across the RHEL ecosystem.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 5.4 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

Network-reachable SOCKS proxy requires low-privilege client access; limited read/write impact against loopback services; no availability or scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 5.4 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) bypass vulnerability exists in “stunnel” 5.79 and lower when configured in SOCKS proxy mode. This flaw allows a client to bypass intended localhost restrictions by using IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (e.g., “::ffff:127.0.0.1”) or unspecified addresses ("0.0.0.0", "::"), enabling access to loopback-only services on the "stunnel" host that should not be network-reachable.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely used SSL tunneling daemon in enterprise and server environments
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment MSRC Vendor VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

27
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +27
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 Not-Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy