Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver crafted malicious archive
  2. Delivery
    Windows libarchive parses archive
  3. Exploit
    Trigger double free (CWE-415)
  4. Execution
    Groom and corrupt heap memory
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Double free prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target system to parse an attacker-supplied, maliciously crafted archive using the Windows-bundled libarchive component (e.g., tar.exe/bsdtar or any application/service that invokes the library). The CVSS vector lists PR:N (no authentication) and UI:N (no interaction), implying an unattended/automated archive-processing context; however, in interactive deployments a user must typically initiate extraction of the hostile archive, which is a meaningful limiting factor. The primary constraint is attack complexity: AC:H reflects that a double free must be won and the resulting heap corruption reliably shaped into code execution, which demands precise heap grooming rather than a deterministic single request. Systems that never process untrusted archives are not realistically exposed.

Impact

Signals are mixed, pointing to a serious-but-not-emergency vulnerability. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) reflects a network-reachable, unauthenticated memory-corruption flaw with total CIA impact, but the AC:H flag and CWE-415 (double free) indicate that reliable exploitation requires non-trivial heap manipulation rather than a simple one-shot request. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a measured posture: Exploitation=none (no observed activity), Automatable=no (cannot be reliably scripted at scale), and Technical Impact=total (full compromise if achieved). No EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or available weaponized code. Notable tension to verify: the vector asserts UI:N (no user interaction), yet a double free in an archive-parsing library (libarchive) typically requires the target to open or extract an attacker-supplied archive - the UI:N rating likely assumes an automated service that parses archives unattended; defenders should confirm whether their deployment auto-processes untrusted archives. Overall this is a genuine high-severity patching priority given ubiquitous Windows exposure and total technical impact, but the AC:H rating, SSVC Automatable=no, and absence of exploitation signals argue against treating it as an in-the-wild emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malformed archive (e.g., tar/zip) that triggers the double-free condition when parsed by Windows' bundled libarchive (such as tar.exe/bsdtar or any service invoking the library). When the target processes the archive, the double free corrupts heap memory, which a skilled attacker grooms to achieve arbitrary code execution. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS AC:H rating indicates reliable exploitation requires careful heap control.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Memory corruption in the libarchive component bundled with Windows (the library behind tar.exe/bsdtar) lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker execute code on affected hosts by having them process a maliciously crafted archive. The root cause is a double free (CWE-415) during archive parsing that corrupts the heap, and because reliably converting that corruption into code execution requires precise heap grooming, Microsoft and our own assessment both rate attack complexity as High despite a CVSS base score of 8.1. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC decision framework records exploitation as none and automatable as no, and vendor patches are already available for every affected Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server branch, so this is a serious-but-not-emergency issue that should be closed on a normal patch cadence. One caveat: Microsoft's vector lists UI:N (no user interaction) while our independent assessment uses UI:R, since in interactive deployments a user or application typically has to initiate extraction of the hostile archive - an unattended/service context is where the impact is highest.

RemediationAI

Primary fix: apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-70062 as documented in the vendor advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70062 - patch status is "Patch available per vendor advisory", and the fixed build for each branch is the upper bound of the affected range, i.e. 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809, Server 2019/Server Core), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022) and 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025/Server Core). Prioritise internet-facing or service-account processes that unpack attacker-supplied archives, since those match the PR:N/no-interaction portion of the attack surface; note that no public exploit exists at time of analysis, so emergency out-of-band deployment is not required and normal monthly cumulative-update cadence is acceptable. Until every host is patched, compensating controls are to stop untrusted archives from reaching libarchive at all - strip or quarantine archive attachments at the mail/web gateway (trade-off: blocks legitimate .zip/.tar/.7z business mail), block archive MIME types and extensions at the perimeter proxy, and disable or AppLocker/WDAC-restrict tar.exe and third-party utilities that bundle libarchive on servers that have no business extracting archives (trade-off: breaks built-in archive handling and any automation scripts relying on tar.exe, so validate before enforcing). Where archive extraction is a required business function, run it in a disposable, low-privilege container or sandbox with no credential material and no network egress, and require a manual review step before extraction; this does not eliminate the bug but removes the credential and lateral-movement payoff that makes heap corruption worth exploiting. Detection-wise, monitor for unexpected tar.exe/bsdtar child processes spawned by services (IIS, scheduled tasks, mail gateways) and for archive files written to temporary directories immediately preceding such spawns, which is the behaviour profile this double-free path would exhibit.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Libarchive is an open-source, multi-format archive and compression library (tar, cpio, pax, zip, 7z, rar, xar, ISO, plus gzip/bzip2/xz/zstd filters) that Microsoft ships in-box with Windows and exposes through the bsdtar-based tar.exe utility; any application, script or service that links or shells out to that parser inherits the exposure. The flaw is classified CWE-415 (Double Free): a parser code path releases the same heap buffer twice, creating a dangling reference that an attacker-crafted archive can shape into overlapping allocations, out-of-bounds writes and ultimately attacker-controlled execution in the context of the parsing process. The NVD vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) describes a network-reachable, unauthenticated target with no scope change and full loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability, which implies an automated archive-processing service; our authoritative re-assessment keeps the same impact and AC:H but sets UI:R to reflect the common real-world requirement that a user or application trigger extraction. AC:H is the key qualifier: the double free must be won deterministically and the resulting heap state groomed into a usable corruption primitive, which is far harder than a straightforward single-request bug and is consistent with CISA's SSVC judgement that the issue is not automatable. CPE/version data shows the exposure spans nearly the entire supported Windows client and server line, including Server Core installations, meaning the same library code is present in both GUI and headless environments.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Network-delivered crafted archive (AV:N) with no auth (PR:N); double-free exploitation needs heap grooming (AC:H); a user typically must extract the archive (UI:R), yielding full RCE impact (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 8.1

DescriptionCVE.org

Double free in Windows Libarchive allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The libarchive library that Microsoft bundles with Windows to power tar.exe and bsdtar contains a memory-corruption flaw, and an affected host that processes a crafted archive could be made to run attacker-supplied code with the privileges of the user or service handling the file. Because tar.exe/bsdtar ships across Windows 10, Windows 11 and every supported Windows Server branch, the exposure spans virtually the entire estate, though Microsoft rates exploitation complexity as High and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. Vendor patches are already available for all affected branches, so leadership should treat this as a broad but manageable exposure to be closed on the normal monthly patch cadence rather than an emergency response.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 48% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
libarchive is bundled in all modern Windows releases (tar.exe)
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0
CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy