Skip to main content

Windows DHCP Server CVE-2026-69830

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99283 HIGH
Race Condition (CWE-362)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-2fwv-rh53-68g8
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach DHCP service over network
  2. Delivery
    Flood concurrent crafted DHCP messages
  3. Exploit
    Win narrow race-condition window
  4. Execution
    Corrupt shared-resource state
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on DHCP server

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Concurrency control, locking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a reachable, running Windows DHCP Server role accepting DHCP traffic from the attacker's network segment; exploitation is unauthenticated (PR:N) and needs no user interaction. The primary limiting factor is the race-condition timing dependency (AC:H) - the attacker must win a narrow, non-deterministic synchronization window on a shared resource, so exploitation is unreliable and typically demands repeated concurrent requests and possibly specific server load conditions. Hosts without the DHCP Server role installed, or where DHCP is not network-reachable by the attacker, are not exposed.

Impact

This is a genuinely serious but practically difficult vulnerability. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) scores 8.1 and combines the worst-case attributes of network reach, no authentication, and no user interaction with full CIA impact - a potential unauthenticated remote code execution on a core infrastructure service. The critical counterweight is AC:H: as a CWE-362 race condition, successful exploitation depends on winning a timing-sensitive window that is not reliably controllable by the attacker, which substantially reduces real-world exploitability and typically requires many attempts or specific load conditions. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC indicator was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; this tempers urgency relative to the headline score. Note a tagging conflict: the input carries an 'Authentication Bypass' tag, but the description and CWE-362 describe a race-condition RCE, not an authentication-bypass class - the PR:N (unauthenticated) metric likely drove that mislabel. Net: treat as a high-priority patch item for exposed Windows DHCP servers, but the AC:H timing dependency means widespread reliable exploitation is less likely than the 8.1 suggests absent a published weaponized technique.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network access to a Windows DHCP Server rapidly sends concurrent, carefully timed DHCP messages to trigger a race condition in the server's handling of a shared resource, corrupting memory in a way that yields code execution in the DHCP service context. No credentials or user interaction are required, but the attacker must repeatedly attempt the race to hit the narrow timing window (AC:H). No public exploit code was identified in the provided intelligence.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Unauthenticated remote code execution in the Microsoft Windows DHCP Server role is achievable when an attacker on a reachable network segment wins a race condition on a shared resource inside the DHCP service. The vulnerability is rated CVSS 8.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), with complete confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, but the high attack complexity reflects a narrow, non-deterministic synchronization window that makes exploitation unreliable and typically requires repeated concurrent DHCP requests, potentially combined with favorable server load conditions. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and there is no CISA KEV listing; hosts without the DHCP Server role installed, or where DHCP traffic cannot be reached from an untrusted segment, are not exposed.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to apply the Microsoft security update released for CVE-2026-69830, tracked through the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69830; no specific fix version or KB number was enumerated in the supplied data, so do not assume a particular build and verify the applicable patch for each Windows Server release in that advisory. Patch status therefore is best described as available per vendor advisory where Microsoft has published an update for the affected build, and unpatched hosts should be treated as exposed until confirmed otherwise. Where immediate patching is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to restrict inbound UDP 67/68 traffic to the DHCP server using host firewall rules or network ACLs so only known DHCP relay agents, proxies, and trusted client subnets can reach it, with the trade-off that any excluded segment loses dynamic address assignment and must fall back to static addressing or a secondary scope. Disabling or removing the DHCP Server role on hosts that do not need it eliminates the attack surface entirely, at the cost of losing centralized lease management on those systems. Enabling DHCP audit logging and monitoring for bursts of malformed or concurrent requests from a single source can help detect exploitation attempts, and DHCP snooping or port security on managed switches limits rogue clients on the same broadcast domain; both add administrative overhead and require managed network hardware. Because the flaw requires winning a narrow timing window, reducing concurrent load and segmenting the DHCP server onto a management VLAN also lowers practical exploitability, though it does not remove the underlying defect.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-362, concurrent execution using a shared resource with improper synchronization, inside the Windows DHCP Server service that handles dynamic address assignment over UDP ports 67 and 68. Because the service processes multiple client requests concurrently against shared lease/state structures, a timing-dependent window exists in which an unauthenticated remote sender on the same or an adjacent network segment can interleave requests to corrupt internal state; per the CVSS vector (PR:N, UI:N, AV:N) no credentials or user interaction are needed, and the C:H/I:H/A:H profile indicates the corrupted state can be leveraged for arbitrary code execution in the context of the highly privileged DHCP service. The AC:H rating and the accompanying 'Authentication Bypass' and 'Race Condition' tags indicate the primitive is a non-deterministic synchronization flaw rather than a straightforward memory-safety bug, so reliable exploitation would require sustained concurrent traffic. No CPE strings or EPSS data were supplied with this intelligence, so the exact Windows Server builds carrying the vulnerable DHCP role code must be confirmed against the Microsoft advisory rather than inferred.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Network-reachable DHCP service with no auth or UI (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N); AC:H because the CWE-362 race window is timing-dependent and not attacker-controlled; full C/I/A from service-context code execution.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:18 nvd
HIGH 8.1

DescriptionCVE.org

Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity, unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows DHCP Server role (CVE-2026-69830) allows an attacker on an adjacent or reachable network segment to gain full control of a DHCP host, with complete loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability. Because Windows DHCP servers frequently sit on core internal segments and are often co-located with DNS and Active Directory services, a compromised host can serve as a beachhead for domain-wide disruption and rogue lease injection affecting large user populations. Leadership should note that no vendor patch is available and no public exploit code exists at this time, so exposure management depends on network segmentation and monitoring rather than a software update.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict UDP 67/68 to authorized DHCP relay agents and management subnets via host firewall or network ACLs; isolate DHCP servers in a dedicated VLAN with limited east-west access; disable and uninstall the DHCP Server role where it is not operationally required; consolidate to fewer, hardened DHCP hosts; enforce least-privilege administrative access and local firewall rules on the servers; enable DHCP audit logging and monitor for abnormal request bursts, rogue leases, or service crashes; maintain DHCP failover redundancy so a compromised or unstable node can be removed quickly; and apply vendor hardening guidance from the advisory until an official fix ships.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 73% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Windows Server DHCP role is common across enterprise networks
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Race conditions occur when multiple concurrent requests exploit the brief time gap between checking a condition and acting upon it (TOCTOU - Time of Check, Time of Use).

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy