Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious ELF file
  2. Delivery
    Deliver to target system
  3. Exploit
    User executes readelf on file
  4. Execution
    Parser exhausts resources or dereferences null pointer
  5. Impact
    readelf crashes or system memory exhausted

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the following specific conditions: (1) local system access to invoke the readelf utility, (2) ability to provide a specially crafted ELF file as input to readelf (either by placing it in a location readelf accesses or by directly supplying it as an argument), and (3) user interaction - a user or automated process must execute readelf against the malicious file. The vulnerability does NOT require elevated privileges (PR:N) and does NOT require prior authentication beyond local system access. The attack is limited by requirement for user interaction (UI:R), meaning the attacker cannot remotely trigger readelf to process a malicious file without social engineering or placement in a location where automated tools will process it. The vulnerability is NOT exploitable via network attack, remote command execution, or any mechanism that does not require local file system access and readelf invocation.

Impact

The CVSS 5.5 score reflects low to medium severity: local attack vector (AV:L), low complexity (AC:L), no privilege requirement (PR:N), but user interaction required (UI:R) to open the malicious file, with impact limited to availability (A:H). The CVSS vector indicates this is NOT a remote vulnerability and requires a user to actively open a crafted file. Real-world risk depends on threat model: in environments where readelf is regularly used by developers, system administrators, or automated build systems to parse untrusted ELF binaries (e.g., malware analysis, reverse engineering, package verification), the risk is elevated. However, in production systems where readelf is rarely invoked interactively, risk is minimal. The requirement for user interaction (UI:R) significantly reduces the attack surface compared to an unauthenticated remote exploit. No EPSS score, KEV status, or public POC availability is documented in the provided intelligence, suggesting this is a lower-priority finding with limited weaponization potential to date. Defenders should prioritize based on whether readelf is exposed to untrusted input in their environment.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A security researcher conducting malware analysis downloads a suspicious binary from the internet and runs readelf locally to inspect its ELF headers and sections. The binary is actually a malicious file crafted with malformed ELF structures. When readelf parses the file, the resource exhaustion flaw causes the utility to allocate excessive memory, consuming all available RAM and causing system slowdown or crash. Alternatively, if the null pointer dereference is triggered first, readelf immediately segfaults, terminating abruptly without returning results.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Apr 22, 2026

The readelf utility in binutils is vulnerable to denial of service through two distinct flaws triggered by maliciously crafted ELF files: a resource exhaustion vulnerability (CWE-400) causing out-of-memory conditions and a null pointer dereference (CWE-476) causing segmentation faults. Both vulnerabilities require local access and user interaction to open a malicious file, resulting in the readelf utility crashing or becoming unresponsive. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at the time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the security patch released by Red Hat for your respective RHEL version via standard package management tools (yum/dnf update binutils). Specific patch versions should be confirmed from the Red Hat Security Advisory URL provided in references. Until patching is possible, implement compensating controls: restrict readelf usage to trusted sources by enforcing file integrity checks before processing (e.g., GPG signature verification for binaries intended for analysis), disable interactive readelf usage from untrusted sources in build systems or automation pipelines, and configure resource limits (ulimit -m, cgroups memory limits) on systems where readelf processes untrusted ELF files to prevent system-wide out-of-memory conditions. Note that these controls do not eliminate the vulnerability but reduce exposure. Code review of any custom tooling that invokes readelf programmatically is recommended to ensure untrusted input is not passed directly to the utility.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The binutils package provides essential binary utility tools, including readelf, which parses and displays information about Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) files used across Unix-like systems. The vulnerability exists in readelf's parser logic when processing specially crafted ELF headers or sections. CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) indicates the parser lacks proper bounds checking or resource limits when allocating memory for ELF structures, allowing an attacker to exhaust available system memory. CWE-476 (Null Pointer Dereference) indicates inadequate validation of parsed ELF data structures before dereferencing pointers, causing immediate crashes. These are common input validation flaws in binary parsers that operate on untrusted file formats. The CPE data indicates binutils is distributed as part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, 8, and 10 systems.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 5.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch released
Apr 29, 2026 - 02:30 nvd
Patch available
CVE Published
Apr 22, 2026 - 08:37 nvd
MEDIUM 5.5

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in the readelf utility of the binutils package. A local attacker could exploit two Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerabilities by providing a specially crafted Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) file. One vulnerability, a resource exhaustion (CWE-400), can lead to an out-of-memory condition. The other, a null pointer dereference (CWE-476), can cause a segmentation fault. Both issues can result in the readelf utility becoming unresponsive or crashing, leading to a denial of service.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 98% exploitable
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor CIRCL VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_hardened_images:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_openshift_container_platform_4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Medium
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Development Tools 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7 Fixed

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy