Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain valid AMQP credentials to any vhost
-
DeliveryOpen AMQP 0-9-1 connection
-
ExploitSend ~1M ops with unique amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.<node> names
-
Executionbinary_to_atom leaks non-GC'd atoms
-
PersistExhaust Erlang atom table
-
ImpactCrash entire broker VM (all vhosts down)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 connection to any vhost (any credential, any permission level). Exploitation uses queue names or routing keys beginning with the 'amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.' prefix (RabbitMQ's direct reply-to feature), whose ETF-encoded pid node-name field is passed to binary_to_atom. The attack requires sending on the order of 1,000,000 distinct-node-name requests to exhaust the atom table. The key limiting factor is rate limiting: a per-connection or per-user rate limit low enough to make ~1M operations infeasible neutralizes the attack, as does restricting AMQP access to fully trusted clients. No user interaction and no admin privileges are needed; impact is total broker crash across all vhosts. Affected versions are prior to 4.2.7 and 4.3.1. |
| Impact | This is a credible, actionable availability risk against a widely-deployed message broker, though not an emergency. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N, VA:H, VC:N/VI:N) correctly frames it: network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring an authenticated AMQP session (PR:L), with pure availability impact - no confidentiality or integrity loss. The 7.1 (HIGH) score is driven entirely by VA:H (full broker VM crash affecting all vhosts and all connections). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV entry, and no public exploit code are present in the provided data, so exploitation status is: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The one signal that could depress real-world exploitation is the operational bar - an attacker must sustain ~1,000,000 requests, which is trivial in raw compute but noisy and rate-limitable; AC:L/AT:N are arguably generous given that a sufficiently low per-connection rate limit defeats the attack. Net: a real patch-worthy DoS for any RabbitMQ exposed to semi-trusted or multi-tenant authenticated clients, but lower urgency than an unauthenticated or code-execution flaw. Missing data: no EPSS, no KEV, no POC - none of which are errors, just absence of amplifying signals. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker holding any valid AMQP 0-9-1 credential (e.g. a low-privilege tenant or a compromised application account) opens a connection to any vhost and issues ~1M operations using queue names or routing keys beginning with 'amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.', each carrying a unique attacker-chosen node-name in the ETF-encoded pid. Each request creates a new, never-reclaimed atom via binary_to_atom, exhausting the fixed Erlang atom table and crashing the entire broker VM - taking down all vhosts and all connections. No public exploit code is identified, but the technique is fully described in the advisory and the request pattern is cheap and scriptable. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026
Denial of service in RabbitMQ versions prior to 4.2.7 and 4.3.1 allows any authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 client to crash the entire Erlang VM, taking down all vhosts and connections, by exhausting the atom table with roughly one million requests. The attack exploits the direct reply-to feature: queue names or routing keys beginning with 'amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.' cause an ETF-encoded pid node name to be passed to binary_to_atom without using binary_to_existing_atom, and because atoms are never garbage collected, the try/catch cannot reclaim them. Exploitation requires a valid AMQP connection (any credential, any permission level) and the ability to send the large number of operations; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to RabbitMQ 4.2.7 or 4.3.1, which contain the vendor-released patch. No official workaround beyond upgrading is documented, but two compensating controls can neutralize the attack: (1) enforce a per-connection or per-user rate limit low enough to make sending approximately one million operations infeasible - trade-off is potential throttling of legitimate high-throughput clients; (2) restrict AMQP access to fully trusted clients only - trade-off is reduced flexibility for untrusted or multi-tenant consumers. If the direct reply-to feature is not required, disabling it would remove the vulnerable code path, but this breaks client request-response patterns that rely on it. References: https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-x96j-244m-mrr2.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
RabbitMQ is an Erlang/OTP-based message broker. The affected code path lies in the rabbit_pid_codec module, specifically decompose_from_binary/1, which decodes ETF (Erlang Term Format) binaries supplied by clients. When handling queue names or routing keys that begin with 'amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.' (the direct reply-to feature), rabbit_volatile_queue:pid_from_name/2 invokes the decoder, which calls binary_to_atom(Node, utf8) on the node-name field. Because binary_to_existing_atom is not used, each unique node name creates a new atom. Erlang atoms are never garbage collected, so the surrounding try/catch cannot reclaim them; the CandidateNodes membership check occurs after the atom is created, meaning even invalid names consume atom table entries. This is a CWE-400 uncontrolled resource consumption issue. An authenticated attacker can generate approximately one million distinct node names to exhaust the atom table's default limit (about 1,048,576), causing the entire Erlang VM to crash and taking down all vhosts and connections. No CPE strings were provided, but the affected product is RabbitMQ Server prior to 4.2.7 and 4.3.1.
Know when Rabbitmq gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable with valid credentials (PR:L), no user interaction; sending ~1M cheap requests is low-complexity (AC:L); pure broker-crash availability impact (A:H) with no C/I loss; VM crash stays within the broker (S:U).
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (github).
CVSS VectorVendor: github
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.2.7 and 4.3.1, rabbit_pid_codec:decompose_from_binary/1 parses a caller-supplied ETF-encoded binary and calls binary_to_atom(Node, utf8) on the node-name field. It is reached from rabbit_volatile_queue:pid_from_name/2, which is invoked for any queue name / routing key beginning amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.. The CandidateNodes membership check happens after the atom is created, and the surrounding try/catch cannot reclaim atoms (they are never GC'd). binary_to_existing_atom is not used. Any authenticated AMQP client can crash the entire Erlang VM (all vhosts, all connections) with ~1M cheap requests. Preconditions include Authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 connection to any vhost No per-connection rate limit low enough to make ~1M operations infeasible. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.7 and 4.3.1.
Technical POC Analysis
CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption), specifically Erlang atom-table exhaustion.
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
RabbitMQ deployments running versions earlier than 4.2.7 or 4.3.1 are exposed to a high-severity denial-of-service vulnerability that can crash the entire Erlang VM and take down all vhosts and connections. This can disrupt any application or business process relying on RabbitMQ as a message broker, causing service outages and potential SLA breaches. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the flaw can be triggered by a user with valid AMQP credentials and any permission level, so organizations should prioritize remediation.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Sensitive credential disclosure in RabbitMQ affects installations running the management plugin with OAuth 2 configured
Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x ver
Denial of service in the RabbitMQ Java client library (com.rabbitmq:amqp-client ≤ 5.30.0) allows a malicious or compromi
An issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.
Parsing desynchronization in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go AMQP 0.9.1 client library before 1.13.0 lets a malicious or comprom
RabbitMQ's amqp091-go Go client library, in all versions before 1.13.0, builds TLS configuration from amqps:// URIs with
RabbitMQ is a multi-protocol messaging broker. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.4), this vulnerability is remotely exploita
RabbitMQ brokers that use the OAuth2 plugin can silently fall back to disabled TLS certificate verification when no CA b
Silent AMQP 0.9.1 metadata corruption in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go Go client library prior to 1.13.0 lets an application t
TLS client-authentication bypass in the RabbitMQ trust-store plugin lets a remote unauthenticated attacker whose forged
TLS certificate validation is completely bypassed in the RabbitMQ Java client library (`com.rabbitmq:amqp-client`) prior
Denial of service in the official RabbitMQ Go client library amqp091-go (versions prior to 1.13.0): a malicious, comprom
Same weakness CWE-400 – Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
View allSame technique Denial Of Service
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-85624
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB