Skip to main content

RabbitMQ CVE-2026-67238

| EUVDEUVD-2026-85624 HIGH
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)
2026-09-23 security-advisories@github.com
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: github
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid AMQP credentials to any vhost
  2. Delivery
    Open AMQP 0-9-1 connection
  3. Exploit
    Send ~1M ops with unique amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.<node> names
  4. Execution
    binary_to_atom leaks non-GC'd atoms
  5. Persist
    Exhaust Erlang atom table
  6. Impact
    Crash entire broker VM (all vhosts down)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 connection to any vhost (any credential, any permission level). Exploitation uses queue names or routing keys beginning with the 'amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.' prefix (RabbitMQ's direct reply-to feature), whose ETF-encoded pid node-name field is passed to binary_to_atom. The attack requires sending on the order of 1,000,000 distinct-node-name requests to exhaust the atom table. The key limiting factor is rate limiting: a per-connection or per-user rate limit low enough to make ~1M operations infeasible neutralizes the attack, as does restricting AMQP access to fully trusted clients. No user interaction and no admin privileges are needed; impact is total broker crash across all vhosts. Affected versions are prior to 4.2.7 and 4.3.1.

Impact

This is a credible, actionable availability risk against a widely-deployed message broker, though not an emergency. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N, VA:H, VC:N/VI:N) correctly frames it: network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring an authenticated AMQP session (PR:L), with pure availability impact - no confidentiality or integrity loss. The 7.1 (HIGH) score is driven entirely by VA:H (full broker VM crash affecting all vhosts and all connections). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV entry, and no public exploit code are present in the provided data, so exploitation status is: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The one signal that could depress real-world exploitation is the operational bar - an attacker must sustain ~1,000,000 requests, which is trivial in raw compute but noisy and rate-limitable; AC:L/AT:N are arguably generous given that a sufficiently low per-connection rate limit defeats the attack. Net: a real patch-worthy DoS for any RabbitMQ exposed to semi-trusted or multi-tenant authenticated clients, but lower urgency than an unauthenticated or code-execution flaw. Missing data: no EPSS, no KEV, no POC - none of which are errors, just absence of amplifying signals.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker holding any valid AMQP 0-9-1 credential (e.g. a low-privilege tenant or a compromised application account) opens a connection to any vhost and issues ~1M operations using queue names or routing keys beginning with 'amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.', each carrying a unique attacker-chosen node-name in the ETF-encoded pid. Each request creates a new, never-reclaimed atom via binary_to_atom, exhausting the fixed Erlang atom table and crashing the entire broker VM - taking down all vhosts and all connections. No public exploit code is identified, but the technique is fully described in the advisory and the request pattern is cheap and scriptable.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026

Denial of service in RabbitMQ versions prior to 4.2.7 and 4.3.1 allows any authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 client to crash the entire Erlang VM, taking down all vhosts and connections, by exhausting the atom table with roughly one million requests. The attack exploits the direct reply-to feature: queue names or routing keys beginning with 'amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.' cause an ETF-encoded pid node name to be passed to binary_to_atom without using binary_to_existing_atom, and because atoms are never garbage collected, the try/catch cannot reclaim them. Exploitation requires a valid AMQP connection (any credential, any permission level) and the ability to send the large number of operations; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to RabbitMQ 4.2.7 or 4.3.1, which contain the vendor-released patch. No official workaround beyond upgrading is documented, but two compensating controls can neutralize the attack: (1) enforce a per-connection or per-user rate limit low enough to make sending approximately one million operations infeasible - trade-off is potential throttling of legitimate high-throughput clients; (2) restrict AMQP access to fully trusted clients only - trade-off is reduced flexibility for untrusted or multi-tenant consumers. If the direct reply-to feature is not required, disabling it would remove the vulnerable code path, but this breaks client request-response patterns that rely on it. References: https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-x96j-244m-mrr2.

Affected VersionsENISA

rabbitmq-server 4.2.0, < 4.2.7
rabbitmq-server 4.3.0, < 4.3.1

Affected Packages

euvd rabbitmq_server_4_2_0 fix: 4.2.7
euvd rabbitmq_server_4_3_0 fix: 4.3.1

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

RabbitMQ is an Erlang/OTP-based message broker. The affected code path lies in the rabbit_pid_codec module, specifically decompose_from_binary/1, which decodes ETF (Erlang Term Format) binaries supplied by clients. When handling queue names or routing keys that begin with 'amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.' (the direct reply-to feature), rabbit_volatile_queue:pid_from_name/2 invokes the decoder, which calls binary_to_atom(Node, utf8) on the node-name field. Because binary_to_existing_atom is not used, each unique node name creates a new atom. Erlang atoms are never garbage collected, so the surrounding try/catch cannot reclaim them; the CandidateNodes membership check occurs after the atom is created, meaning even invalid names consume atom table entries. This is a CWE-400 uncontrolled resource consumption issue. An authenticated attacker can generate approximately one million distinct node names to exhaust the atom table's default limit (about 1,048,576), causing the entire Erlang VM to crash and taking down all vhosts and connections. No CPE strings were provided, but the affected product is RabbitMQ Server prior to 4.2.7 and 4.3.1.

Know when Rabbitmq gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (github) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable with valid credentials (PR:L), no user interaction; sending ~1M cheap requests is low-complexity (AC:L); pure broker-crash availability impact (A:H) with no C/I loss; VM crash stays within the broker (S:U).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Red Hat 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (github).

CVSS VectorVendor: github

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 23, 2026 - 21:17 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 23, 2026 - 20:17 cve.org
HIGH 7.1

DescriptionCVE.org

RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.2.7 and 4.3.1, rabbit_pid_codec:decompose_from_binary/1 parses a caller-supplied ETF-encoded binary and calls binary_to_atom(Node, utf8) on the node-name field. It is reached from rabbit_volatile_queue:pid_from_name/2, which is invoked for any queue name / routing key beginning amq.rabbitmq.reply-to.. The CandidateNodes membership check happens after the atom is created, and the surrounding try/catch cannot reclaim atoms (they are never GC'd). binary_to_existing_atom is not used. Any authenticated AMQP client can crash the entire Erlang VM (all vhosts, all connections) with ~1M cheap requests. Preconditions include Authenticated AMQP 0-9-1 connection to any vhost No per-connection rate limit low enough to make ~1M operations infeasible. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.7 and 4.3.1.

Technical POC Analysis

CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption), specifically Erlang atom-table exhaustion.

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

RabbitMQ deployments running versions earlier than 4.2.7 or 4.3.1 are exposed to a high-severity denial-of-service vulnerability that can crash the entire Erlang VM and take down all vhosts and connections. This can disrupt any application or business process relying on RabbitMQ as a message broker, causing service outages and potential SLA breaches. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the flaw can be triggered by a user with valid AMQP credentials and any permission level, so organizations should prioritize remediation.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
High
RabbitMQ is a very widely deployed enterprise/OSS messaging broker
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-57219 HIGH POC
8.7 Jul 10

Sensitive credential disclosure in RabbitMQ affects installations running the management plugin with OAuth 2 configured

CVE-2019-11287 HIGH POC
7.5 Nov 23

Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x ver

CVE-2026-63335 MEDIUM POC
6.3 Aug 18

Denial of service in the RabbitMQ Java client library (com.rabbitmq:amqp-client ≤ 5.30.0) allows a malicious or compromi

CVE-2016-9877 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 29

An issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.

CVE-2026-77411 CRITICAL
9.5 Sep 16

Parsing desynchronization in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go AMQP 0.9.1 client library before 1.13.0 lets a malicious or comprom

CVE-2026-77405 CRITICAL
9.4 Sep 16

RabbitMQ's amqp091-go Go client library, in all versions before 1.13.0, builds TLS configuration from amqps:// URIs with

CVE-2021-32718 MEDIUM POC
5.4 Jun 28

RabbitMQ is a multi-protocol messaging broker. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.4), this vulnerability is remotely exploita

CVE-2026-67404 CRITICAL
9.2 Sep 23

RabbitMQ brokers that use the OAuth2 plugin can silently fall back to disabled TLS certificate verification when no CA b

CVE-2026-77408 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 16

Silent AMQP 0.9.1 metadata corruption in the RabbitMQ amqp091-go Go client library prior to 1.13.0 lets an application t

CVE-2026-67231 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 23

TLS client-authentication bypass in the RabbitMQ trust-store plugin lets a remote unauthenticated attacker whose forged

CVE-2026-63336 MEDIUM POC
5.1 Aug 18

TLS certificate validation is completely bypassed in the RabbitMQ Java client library (`com.rabbitmq:amqp-client`) prior

CVE-2026-77412 HIGH
8.9 Sep 16

Denial of service in the official RabbitMQ Go client library amqp091-go (versions prior to 1.13.0): a malicious, comprom

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy