Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessSend crafted request with malicious URL
-
DeliveryURL ingested by CSF monitoring
-
ExploitImproper escaping into shell context
-
ExecutionCommand injection as CSF service account
-
PersistExecute arbitrary commands as root
-
ImpactFull server compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that an attacker-supplied request URL reach CSF's URL-handling/escaping code path - the CVSS AT:P flag indicates a specific attack requirement, most plausibly that the malicious URL is observed and processed by CSF's log/request monitoring rather than exploited via an arbitrary standalone request. No authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N/UI:N) and the vector is network-based (AV:N). Limiting factors: the deployment must run a version containing the vulnerable code (pre-16.30 on the WebPros fork or the original ConfigServer distribution), and the injection depends on the crafted URL being ingested by the vulnerable component; the impact ceiling (root-level RCE) follows from CSF running as a privileged service account. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.2 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N): network-reachable, unauthenticated, no user interaction, with high confidentiality/integrity/availability impact to the vulnerable system and minor subsequent-system impact - consistent with code execution as a privileged service account. The one meaningful limiter is AT:P (attack requirements present), signaling that exploitation is not a single unconditional request but depends on the crafted URL being ingested/processed by CSF (e.g., appearing in a monitored log), which raises real-world attack complexity above a trivial one-shot. EPSS and CISA KEV data were not provided, and no POC is referenced, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or mass-scanning yet; however, given CSF's ubiquity on hosting servers and root-level execution, any operator running CSF should treat patching as urgent regardless of the AT:P caveat. On balance this is a genuine high priority (privileged unauth RCE in widely deployed hosting infrastructure), not a high-CVSS-but-low-impact artifact, though the AT:P precondition means realistic exploitation likely requires triggering a monitored request path rather than a naked packet. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker sends a crafted HTTP request whose URL embeds shell metacharacters to a server fronted by (or monitored by) CSF; when CSF processes that URL without proper escaping, the injected commands execute under the CSF service account. Because that account is typically root-privileged, the attacker gains full command execution on the host and can pivot, persist, or disable the firewall. No public exploit code is referenced, but the injection primitive is straightforward once the triggering request path is identified. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 10, 2026
Remote code execution in ConfigServer Security & Firewall (CSF) allows an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary OS commands as the CSF service account through shell command injection stemming from improperly escaped request URLs. It affects the original ConfigServer distribution and the WebPros-maintained fork containing the vulnerable code, and is fixed in WebPros version 16.30. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but because CSF's login-failure daemon typically runs with root-level privileges, successful exploitation grants full server control.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to WebPros ConfigServer Security & Firewall version 16.30 or later, per the cPanel/WebPros advisory (https://support.cpanel.net/hc/en-us/articles/43387915588375-Security-CVE-2026-65638-CSF-Security-Release). Operators running the original ConfigServer distribution or a third-party fork should confirm with their maintainer whether the fix is incorporated and update accordingly. Until patched, restrict network exposure of the affected server and any CSF/WHM management interfaces to trusted management IPs only, and where feasible reduce the ingestion of untrusted request URLs into CSF-monitored logs - noting that tightening log processing or blocking front-end request paths can reduce firewall visibility and legitimate intrusion-detection coverage, so treat these as temporary stopgaps rather than a substitute for upgrading to 16.30.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
ConfigServer Security & Firewall (CSF) is a Linux stateful firewall and login/intrusion-detection suite widely paired with cPanel/WHM hosting stacks; CPE identifies both cpe:2.3:a:webpros:configserver_security_&_firewall and cpe:2.3:a:configserver:configserver_security_&_firewall as affected. The root cause is CWE-78 (OS Command Injection): a request URL is passed into a shell context without proper escaping, so attacker-controlled URL content is interpreted as shell metacharacters and executed. CSF's monitoring components (notably the lfd daemon) parse web/server logs and act on observed request data, which is the plausible path by which an externally supplied URL reaches a privileged shell invocation.
Know when Configserver Security Firewall gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
Network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) but the crafted URL must be ingested by CSF's monitoring (the 4.0 AT:P requirement) so AC:H; RCE as a root-level service account yields C/I/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (hackerone).
CVSS VectorVendor: hackerone
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper escaping of a request URL in ConfigServer Security & Firewall allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as the CSF service account via shell command injection.
The vulnerability affects versions of the software originally distributed by ConfigServer, as well as versions of the WebPros-maintained fork that contain the vulnerable code. WebPros has addressed the vulnerability in version 16.30. Other forks or independently maintained versions of ConfigServer Security & Firewall (CSF) may also be affected and should be evaluated independently.
Executive ViewAI
ConfigServer Security & Firewall (CSF), widely deployed for Linux server protection, contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability allowing attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root through improper URL validation. Total server compromise is possible without authentication, creating severe risk to infrastructure confidentiality and integrity across all affected instances.
Patch available in WebPros fork (version 16.30 or later); apply immediately to all systems using that distribution. For original ConfigServer distribution without vendor patch: implement network segmentation to restrict access to CSF ports, deploy Web Application Firewall rules to block malformed URL requests, monitor authentication and system logs for exploitation attempts, and establish urgent timeline for migration to patched version.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
EUVD-2026-75595
GHSA-8qv3-jfg8-cjvp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB