Skip to main content

Apple iOS CVE-2026-65354

| EUVDEUVD-2026-77866 HIGH
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269)
2026-09-14 apple GHSA-m8cp-2p82-h8wj
8.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: apple
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver malicious app to victim device
  2. Delivery
    User installs and runs the app
  3. Exploit
    Exploit permissions flaw to break sandbox
  4. Execution
    Escalate to unconfined access
  5. Impact
    Read/modify protected data across security boundary

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a malicious application to be installed and executed on the target Apple device (iOS/iPadOS or macOS before version 27 / macOS Golden Gate 27); it is a local attack (AV:L) by an already-running low-privileged app (PR:L) that abuses a permissions weakness to escape its sandbox. Limiting factors: the attacker must first get their app onto the device (via App Store distribution, enterprise/sideload provisioning, or social engineering), the CVSS vector indicates user interaction is involved (UI:R), and patched OS versions (iOS/iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27) fully remediate the flaw. There is no remote or network-based path to trigger this.

Impact

This is one of the more serious issues in the Apple wave because it is a genuine sandbox escape, not the confidentiality-only info-disclosure that dominates the rest of the batch. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.2 HIGH) is internally consistent for a sandbox breakout: local vector, a malicious app already holding low privileges (PR:L), a scope change (S:C) as the app crosses its sandbox boundary, and full C/I/A impact on the escaped-to environment. Counterbalancing signals lower the operational urgency: EPSS is only 0.19% (8th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code - so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' and NOT active exploitation. It is Apple self-reported with a patch already available. Net: a legitimately high-severity technical impact but low near-term exploitation probability, so it ranks as a real priority to patch (sandbox escape is a foundational security-boundary break, often chained after a malicious app is installed) without evidence of widespread or targeted exploitation. One caveat to verify: vendor set UI:R, yet a malicious app typically executes on its own once run - the user-interaction requirement may overstate a gating factor.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker publishes a seemingly benign app that passes App Store / notarization review or is sideloaded, and once the victim runs it the app exploits the permissions flaw to break out of its sandbox and gain access to resources and data outside its confinement. No public proof-of-concept exists, and the local attack vector means the attacker must first get their app onto the device.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 17, 2026

Sandbox escape in Apple iOS, iPadOS, and macOS allows a locally installed low-privileged malicious app to break out of its sandbox and gain elevated access to system resources, affecting iOS/iPadOS and macOS versions prior to 27 (macOS Golden Gate 27). Apple corrected the underlying permissions weakness (CWE-269, improper privilege management) by adding restrictions in the version 27 releases, so devices updated to iOS 27, iPadOS 27, or macOS Golden Gate 27 are remediated. The flaw is local-only with no remote or network trigger and requires the attacker to first get a malicious app onto the device; EPSS is 0.19% (8th percentile) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so risk is concentrated on devices that permit sideloaded, enterprise-provisioned, or otherwise untrusted applications.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Apple fixed this permissions flaw in iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS Golden Gate 27, so the primary action is to upgrade every affected iPhone, iPad, and Mac to those version 27 releases as documented in the Apple advisories at https://support.apple.com/en-us/149034 and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149035. Because exploitation starts with a malicious app already installed on the device, the most effective compensating control where immediate patching is not possible is to restrict app installation to trusted sources: keep App Store-only installation enforced, disable or tightly govern sideloading, developer-mode, and ad-hoc/enterprise provisioning profiles, and revoke unused enterprise certificates - the trade-off is that legitimate internal or beta applications distributed outside the App Store will no longer install or run. Additional hardening includes removing unknown or unused configuration profiles and MDM enrollments (which reduces the attack surface but complicates managed-device administration if profiles are in active use) and, on macOS, limiting non-admin users from installing arbitrary unsigned or unnotarized applications via Gatekeeper policy, which may block some developer workflows. Note that no public exploit code identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, so this can be scheduled within a normal patch cycle rather than treated as an emergency, prioritizing devices that routinely run untrusted or third-party applications. There is no network-side mitigation, firewall rule, or port-blocking control that addresses this flaw because it is strictly a local sandbox boundary issue.

Affected VersionsENISA

macOS 0 <27
iOS and iPadOS 0 <27

Affected Packages

euvd ios_and_ipados fix: 27
euvd macos fix: 27

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a sandbox-escape/privilege-management defect (CWE-269) in Apple's platform sandboxing enforcement, the same containment layer that restricts what a mobile or desktop application can read, write, and execute on iOS/iPadOS and macOS. Apple's own description frames it as a permissions issue resolved by applying 'additional restrictions,' which indicates the sandbox policy or entitlement validation was too permissive and allowed a process confined to an application sandbox to reach outside its intended boundary. The published CVSS:3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms this is a local attack by a low-privileged principal whose successful exploitation changes scope (S:C) and yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - consistent with escaping containment rather than a simple information leak. Our internal assessment retains the same base characteristics (local, low-privilege, scope-changed, high CIA) and applies to the sandboxed-app-to-host escalation path. CPE data maps the exposure to cpe:2.3:a:apple:ios_and_ipados:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* and cpe:2.3:a:apple:macos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, and ENISA EUVD records affected ranges as macOS <27 and iOS/iPadOS <27. Because the attack originates from code already executing on the device, exploitation chains typically pair this primitive with an app-delivery vector, but the sandbox escape itself needs no network exposure.

Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (apple) PRIMARY 8.2 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Local malicious app already running (AV:L/PR:L), sandbox escape crosses a security boundary (S:C) yielding full C/I/A; I drop UI:R to UI:N since a malicious app executes autonomously once launched.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (apple).

CVSS VectorVendor: apple

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Sep 17, 2026 - 15:22 NVD
8.2 (HIGH)
Patch available
Sep 14, 2026 - 22:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 14, 2026 - 20:49 cve.org
HIGH 8.2
CVE Published
Sep 14, 2026 - 20:49 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27. A malicious app may be able to break out of its sandbox.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A privilege-management flaw in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS lets a malicious app already installed on a device break out of its sandbox and reach system resources it should not access, affecting all versions prior to iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS Golden Gate 27. Because exploitation requires an attacker to first convince a user or administrator to install an untrusted app, the practical exposure is concentrated in environments that allow sideloading, enterprise provisioning, or unvetted third-party software on corporate or BYOD Apple devices. Leadership should care because a sandbox escape undermines the core containment control that protects corporate email, credentials, and data on those devices, and remediation is straightforward but depends on fleet-wide upgrade discipline.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Apple iOS/iPadOS/macOS are consumer operating systems on billions of devices
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Medium

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +41
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

More in macOS

View all
CVE-2025-34089 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 03

An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope

CVE-2026-86950 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 28

Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe

CVE-2026-20700 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 11

Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV

CVE-2022-48618 HIGH
7.0 Jan 09

The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)

CVE-2024-27822 HIGH POC
7.8 May 14

A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent

CVE-2023-22809 HIGH POC
7.8 Jan 18

In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen

CVE-2022-46689 HIGH POC
7.0 Dec 15

A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2022-32845 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 23

This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2021-44790 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 20

A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from

CVE-2025-52841 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i

CVE-2022-3970 HIGH POC
8.8 Nov 13

A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut

CVE-2022-0729 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 23

Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy