Skip to main content

Oracle GoldenGate CVE-2026-60570

| EUVDEUVD-2026-46932 HIGH
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-07-21 secalert_us@oracle.com GHSA-pg38-rgfx-cf4f
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: oracle
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local logon on GoldenGate host
  2. Exploit
    Invoke vulnerable Libraries component code path
  3. Execution
    Escalate control over GoldenGate runtime
  4. Impact
    Take over GoldenGate instance and replicated data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local logon access (a valid low-privileged account, PR:L) to the infrastructure where Oracle GoldenGate executes; per AV:L this cannot be triggered remotely over the network and needs no user interaction (UI:N) and low attack complexity (AC:L). The affected deployment must be running Oracle GoldenGate 23.4 through 23.26.1 with the Libraries component in use. Limiting factors: the local-only vector rules out unauthenticated internet exploitation, and the requirement for a pre-existing authenticated foothold on the GoldenGate host is the primary constraint reducing real-world exposure to environments where an attacker has already achieved local access.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) describes a locally exploitable, low-complexity issue requiring only low privileges and no user interaction, yielding full compromise of GoldenGate - a serious outcome but gated behind the need for an existing foothold on the host. There is no EPSS score, SSVC decision, KEV listing, or public POC in the provided data, so the practical exploitation likelihood signals are absent rather than reassuringly low; the local attack vector meaningfully constrains mass exploitation, making this a privilege-escalation/lateral-movement risk on already-accessed systems rather than an internet-facing emergency. Note a mild tension: Oracle's 'Information Disclosure' tag implies confidentiality focus, yet the vector asserts equal integrity and availability impact - treat the full-takeover framing from the vector as authoritative and verify scope with Oracle if disclosure-only behavior is expected.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already holds a low-privileged local account on the server running Oracle GoldenGate - for example a compromised operator login or a limited service account - invokes the vulnerable Libraries code path to gain full control of the GoldenGate instance and its replicated data flows. No user interaction or network exposure is needed, but the attacker must first have logon access to the host. No public POC has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 22, 2026

Local privilege-based takeover in Oracle GoldenGate 23.4 through 23.26.1 (Libraries component) allows a low-privileged attacker with logon access to the host running GoldenGate to fully compromise the product, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Disclosed in Oracle's July 2026 Critical Patch Update (CVSS 3.1 base 7.8), it requires local authenticated access rather than network exploitation. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Apply the fixes delivered in Oracle's July 2026 Critical Patch Update (Patch available per vendor advisory; consult https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html for the exact patched build for your GoldenGate 23.x deployment, as no single fixed version string was included in the source data). Because exploitation requires local logon to the host, the most effective compensating controls until patching are to tighten OS-level access: restrict interactive and service-account logon on GoldenGate servers to a minimal set of trusted administrators, enforce least privilege so low-privileged local accounts cannot run or influence GoldenGate processes, and audit filesystem permissions on GoldenGate library and installation directories to prevent tampering by non-admin users - the trade-off is added operational friction for legitimate operators. Monitor GoldenGate process and host logs for anomalous local activity as a detective control while the patch is scheduled.

Affected VersionsENISA

Oracle GoldenGate 23.4 ≤23.26.1

Affected Packages

euvd oracle_goldengate no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Oracle GoldenGate is a real-time data replication and integration platform used to capture, route, and apply transactional changes across heterogeneous databases for high availability, migration, and streaming pipelines. The flaw resides in the Libraries subcomponent - the shared native/runtime libraries loaded by GoldenGate processes - which suggests a code-level defect (for example unsafe library loading, memory handling, or trust in a locally controllable input) that a local user can leverage to escalate control over the GoldenGate runtime. No CWE was assigned by Oracle or NVD, so the precise root-cause class cannot be confirmed; the Oracle tag 'Information Disclosure' points toward a confidentiality-affecting weakness, though the CVSS vector shows full high impact across all three dimensions, indicating complete takeover rather than mere disclosure.

Know when Goldengate gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (oracle) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Description confirms local logon with low privileges and no user interaction leading to full GoldenGate takeover, so AV:L/PR:L with high C/I/A.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (oracle).

CVSS VectorVendor: oracle

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Vulnerability in Oracle GoldenGate (component: Libraries). Supported versions that are affected are 23.4-23.26.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle GoldenGate executes to compromise Oracle GoldenGate. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle GoldenGate. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Oracle GoldenGate 23.4 through 23.26.1 is vulnerable to privilege escalation by authorized system users, enabling complete takeover of critical database replication infrastructure. This threatens the integrity and availability of data synchronization operations that many organizations depend on for compliance and operational continuity.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Restrict local logon access to GoldenGate systems to privileged administrators only; implement host-based privilege escalation detection and alerting; enforce strict access controls and privileged account management; isolate GoldenGate infrastructure from untrusted networks; enable comprehensive audit logging of all local system access and elevation attempts; monitor for suspicious activity patterns consistent with privilege escalation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely used enterprise data-replication tool, but not universal infrastructure
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2017-5645 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 17

In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events

CVE-2021-4104 HIGH
7.5 Dec 14

JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Lo

CVE-2016-0451 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jan 21

Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle GoldenGate component in Oracle GoldenGate 11.2 and 12.1.2 allows remote attacker

CVE-2018-2913 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 17

Vulnerability in the Oracle GoldenGate component of Oracle GoldenGate (subcomponent: Monitoring Manager). Rated critical

CVE-2021-2351 HIGH POC
8.3 Jul 21

Vulnerability in the Advanced Networking Option component of Oracle Database Server. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.3), thi

CVE-2016-0452 CRITICAL
10.0 Jan 21

Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle GoldenGate component in Oracle GoldenGate 11.2 and 12.1.2 allows remote attacker

CVE-2021-23017 HIGH POC
7.7 Jun 01

A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from t

CVE-2021-3749 HIGH POC
7.5 Aug 31

axios is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is

CVE-2018-2914 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 17

Vulnerability in the Oracle GoldenGate component of Oracle GoldenGate (subcomponent: Manager). Rated high severity (CVSS

CVE-2018-2912 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 17

Vulnerability in the Oracle GoldenGate component of Oracle GoldenGate (subcomponent: Manager). Rated high severity (CVSS

CVE-2019-10219 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Nov 08

A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.1), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2016-0450 MEDIUM POC
5.0 Jan 21

Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle GoldenGate component in Oracle GoldenGate 11.2 and 12.1.2 allows remote attacker

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy