Skip to main content

Android TEE CVE-2026-56932

| EUVDEUVD-2026-78967 MEDIUM
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-09-15 Google_Devices GHSA-99mq-5f9f-76w5
6.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Google_Devices
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain System execution privileges on device
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted input to TEE interface
  3. Execution
    Trigger memory corruption via improper input validation
  4. Impact
    Escalate privileges into secure world

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess System (PR:H) execution privileges on the local device (AV:L) - this is not remotely reachable and not exploitable by an unprivileged app. Given that foothold, the attacker must reach an affected Trusted Execution Environment interface and supply crafted, improperly-validated input to trigger memory corruption in the secure world; no user interaction is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors: the high pre-existing privilege requirement (already System), local-only access, and applicability only to affected Android/Pixel builds patched in the 2026-09-01 Pixel bulletin. The specific vulnerable trusted application and the input path are not named in the description.

Impact

This is a vendor-scored 6.7 (Medium) local privilege-escalation flaw in an Android Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), reported via the Pixel bulletin (2026-09-01). The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N confirms it is NOT remotely exploitable and requires the attacker to already hold System (PR:H) execution privileges - a very high bar that already represents deep device compromise. EPSS is negligible at 0.11% (2nd percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' rather than an active threat. The C:H/I:H/A:H impact set is generous given the attacker is already System; the genuine value is the trust-boundary crossing from the Android OS into the TEE (which holds cryptographic keys, DRM secrets, and biometric material), so the confidentiality/integrity claim is defensible as a TEE breach even though it is not remotely reachable. Net: this is a real defense-in-depth issue for the secure world but a LOW real-world priority - the high PR requirement, no automatable remote path, negligible EPSS, and absence of KEV/POC all point to a patch-in-normal-cycle item, not an emergency. Note one signal gap: the SSVC decision framework was not supplied in the input, and CWE-20 (improper input validation) with a 'Buffer Overflow' tag is a loose fit - the actual defect is unvalidated input reaching TEE memory.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already achieved System-level code execution on an affected Android/Pixel device (e.g., via a prior compromise or a malicious privileged component) sends crafted, improperly-validated input to a TEE interface. The malformed input triggers memory corruption inside the trusted application, allowing the attacker to escalate from the Android OS into the secure world without any user interaction. No public exploit code exists for this specific issue.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Memory corruption in the Android Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) allows a local attacker who already holds System execution privileges to escalate privileges within the secure world by supplying improperly validated input to an affected secure-world interface. The flaw is local-only (AV:L), requires high pre-existing privileges (PR:H), and needs no user interaction (UI:N), yielding high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact if the corrupted trusted application is reached; Google rates it 6.7 (Medium). Risk is tempered by the significant foothold required, the local-only attack surface, and the low EPSS score (0.11%, 2nd percentile); no public exploit code has been identified and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV, with fixes delivered in the Pixel security bulletin dated 2026-09-01.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Android/Pixel security update covered by the bulletin dated 2026-09-01 at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/pixel/2026/2026-09-01, which is the authoritative fix reference for this CVE and includes the TEE hardening for affected builds; no standalone fix version string is published in the provided data, so confirm the exact patch level against that bulletin. Because exploitation requires an attacker to already hold System (PR:H) execution privileges on the local device with no user interaction, the most effective compensating control is to prevent that foothold in the first place - enforce strict app sandboxing, keep SELinux enforcing, block untrusted sideloading and ADB/root access on managed devices, and monitor for anomalous privileged processes reaching secure-world interfaces. These controls trade some developer/debugging flexibility for reduced exposure and do not remove the underlying TEE defect, so the vendor update remains mandatory; there is no configuration toggle that disables the affected trusted application from the normal-world side, making the September 2026 Pixel bulletin the only complete mitigation. No vendor-released workaround beyond patching is identified at time of analysis.

Affected VersionsENISA

Android Android kernel

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability sits in the Trusted Execution Environment of affected Android/Pixel devices, a hardware-isolated secure world running trusted applications (TAs) separate from the normal Android OS. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) is the root-cause class: crafted input crossing from the non-secure world into a secure-world TA is not adequately validated, allowing memory corruption such as an out-of-bounds write (reflected in the 'Buffer Overflow' tag) inside the trusted environment. Because the TEE is the trust anchor for key storage, DRM, biometrics, and attestation, corruption there can undermine protections the normal OS cannot touch. CPE data (cpe:2.3:a:google:android) and the EUVD affected-version entry ('Android Android kernel') both point to Android platform builds, with the fix shipped through the Pixel bulletin rather than a standalone kernel CVE. The specific vulnerable trusted application and the exact input path are not named in the advisory, so the precise TEE service at risk remains unidentified from available data.

Know when Android gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Google_Devices) PRIMARY 6.7 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.7 MEDIUM

Local vector needing pre-existing System privileges (PR:H, AV:L, UI:N); C/I/A:H is generous but defensible as a TEE trust-boundary breach exposing secure-world secrets.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Google_Devices).

CVSS VectorVendor: Google_Devices

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
Sep 16, 2026 - 16:22 NVD
6.7 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Sep 15, 2026 - 18:34 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.7
CVE Published
Sep 15, 2026 - 18:34 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

In Trusted Execution Environment, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Android/Pixel TEE component; large device base but scoped to Pixel bulletin
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

CVE-2015-3105 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 10

Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466

CVE-2015-3864 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 01

Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A

CVE-2013-4710 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 03

Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp

CVE-2015-1538 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 01

Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef

CVE-2024-21633 HIGH POC
7.8 Jan 03

Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK

CVE-2017-13156 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 06

An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability

CVE-2016-2107 MEDIUM POC
5.9 May 05

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a

CVE-2015-3106 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 10

Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows

CVE-2015-3107 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 10

Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows

CVE-2013-4787 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 09

Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows

CVE-2014-7911 HIGH
7.2 Dec 15

luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.

CVE-2016-0801 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 07

The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy