Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent-network access with low privileges
-
DeliverySubmit malformed/unexpected input
-
ExploitTrigger improper input validation
-
ExecutionBypass business logic
-
ImpactCause limited unauthorized data modification
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires (1) adjacent-network access (AV:A) - the attacker must share the same logical/physical network segment as the BigFix Service Management instance, not reach it over the open internet; and (2) an existing low-privilege authenticated account (PR:L) on the application. No user interaction is required (UI:N) and scope is unchanged (S:U). The description does not name a specific feature, protocol, or non-default configuration mode as a precondition - the flaw is a general improper-input-validation weakness in application data handling. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the authentication requirement, the adjacent-network constraint, and that impact is confined to limited integrity (I:L) with no confidentiality or availability effect. |
| Impact | This is a low-severity, low-priority issue despite being a published CVE. The vendor CVSS base score is only 3.5 (Low), and the CVSS:3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) tells a consistent, limited story: exploitation requires adjacent-network position (same logical/physical network segment, not the open internet), already-held low-level privileges (PR:L), and yields only a low integrity impact with no confidentiality or availability loss. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept provided, so by precision rules this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' All exploitation signals point the same direction - low real-world urgency. The one notable conflict is the 'Authentication Bypass' tag versus the actual CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) classification and the PR:L vector: a genuine authentication bypass would typically imply PR:N and higher impact, so the tag appears inconsistent with the vendor's own scoring and should be verified against the HCL advisory rather than treated as confirmed. Bottom line: a real but minor hardening issue, not an emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker already authenticated to HCL BigFix Service Management with low-level privileges, and positioned on the same adjacent network segment, submits malformed or unexpected input to an application interface that fails to validate it properly. The processing error allows a business-logic bypass or unintended application behavior resulting in limited, unauthorized modification of data (integrity impact only). No public exploit code is available, so exploitation would require custom crafting against the specific input-handling flaw. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Improper input validation (CWE-20) in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker who already holds a low-privilege authenticated account on the adjacent network submit unexpected or malformed data, producing processing errors, limited business-logic bypasses, and unintended application behavior. The assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N, score 3.5) confines impact to a low-integrity effect with no confidentiality or availability loss, and exploitation requires both adjacency to the deployment and an existing account, so this is a low-severity, low-priority item despite being a published CVE. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing was identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS score was supplied; HCL's own tag of 'Authentication Bypass' is broader than the assessed integrity-only impact and should not be read as a full authentication defeat.
RemediationAI
Patch status is not confirmed from the available data - no fix version is provided in this feed, so consult HCL advisory KB0134015 (https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134015) for the corrected release and apply it once the exact affected versions are confirmed; absence of a listed version here is not evidence that no fix exists. Until a patched build is deployed, apply compensating controls that target the two assessed preconditions: tighten network segmentation so the Service Management instance is not reachable from untrusted or shared adjacent segments (restrict management/ITSM traffic to dedicated VLANs and firewall ACLs), which removes the AV:A attack path at the cost of extra routing complexity for legitimate remote admins; and reduce the low-privilege authenticated attack surface by auditing and disabling unused accounts, enforcing least privilege, and revoking stale service/API credentials, understanding that this only limits PR:L abuse rather than eliminating the input-validation flaw. Because validation gaps may be exercised through integration or API payloads, restrict outbound/inbound connectors to trusted systems and enable input-size and schema enforcement at any reverse proxy or API gateway in front of the application, accepting possible false positives on legitimate large payloads. Log and monitor for malformed-request errors, unusual workflow state changes, and unexpected ticket or record mutations as detection measures while remediation is pending.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a classic CWE-20 improper input validation weakness in HCL BigFix Service Management, an IT service management component of the BigFix endpoint management platform that handles tickets, workflows, and business process records. Root cause is the application's acceptance of attacker-controllable data - via form fields, API parameters, or integration payloads - without sufficient type, length, format, or range validation, so malformed input propagates into downstream processing logic and can deflect workflow state or trigger unhandled errors. No CPE strings or specific module/endpoint identifiers were provided in the intelligence feed, so the precise vulnerable component (web UI, REST API, or connector) cannot be pinned from available data; the description names no non-default configuration mode as a precondition, indicating a general data-handling weakness rather than a feature-gated one. The vendor-supplied tag 'Authentication Bypass' suggests some paths could skip or misapply authorization checks when crafted input is supplied, which is consistent with, but does not exceed, the independently assessed limited-integrity impact - scope is unchanged (S:U), no user interaction is required (UI:N), and the CVSS vector requires adjacent-network positioning (AV:A) plus a low-privilege account (PR:L).
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Vendor vector is well-supported: PR:L and AV:A reflect an authenticated, adjacent-network attacker, and the input-validation flaw yields only limited integrity impact (I:L), with C:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (hcl).
CVSS VectorVendor: hcl
DescriptionCVE.org
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to supply unexpected or malformed data, enabling processing errors, business logic bypasses, and unintended application behavior.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-93373
GHSA-4wg9-7x2v-7wxf
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB