Skip to main content

IntelliOps Event Management CVE-2026-56585

| EUVDEUVD-2026-46277 MEDIUM
Protection Mechanism Failure (CWE-693)
2026-07-21 HCL GHSA-rmmj-ff6h-8758
4.3
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify authenticated IEM administrator target
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious page with hidden IEM iframe
  3. Exploit
    Deliver phishing link to target
  4. Execution
    Victim loads page with active IEM session
  5. Persist
    Victim clicks overlaid UI element
  6. Impact
    Unintended IEM action executed under victim's credentials

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
Exploitation Conditions

The victim must have an active, authenticated session in HCL IntelliOps Event Management at the time of the attack - the technique abuses the existing session cookie, not a credential weakness. The attacker must successfully social-engineer the authenticated user into visiting an attacker-controlled webpage while that session is live. Browsers must not independently block third-party iframes (most modern browsers permit iframes by default in the absence of X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors headers). Exploitation is limited by the requirement for precise UI overlay alignment matched to the IEM interface layout, active user interaction (a click), and the constraint that the attacker can only trigger actions available to the victim's IEM role - they cannot escalate privilege beyond what the targeted account can already do. Exploitation is not possible against unauthenticated users or from contexts where the IEM application is not reachable from user browsers.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 3.1 (Low) is driven by AV:N (network-reachable), AC:H (high attack complexity - precise social engineering and UI overlay alignment required), PR:N (no attacker privileges on IEM), UI:R (victim must interact with the malicious page), S:U (unchanged scope), and a limited I:L integrity impact with no confidentiality or availability consequences. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, so exploitation probability cannot be quantitatively anchored. There is no CISA KEV listing and no publicly available exploit code, making active widespread exploitation unlikely at this time. The 'Authentication Bypass' tag in the source data is potentially misleading - clickjacking does not bypass authentication in the classical sense; rather, it abuses an already-authenticated session to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim. Real-world risk is low: exploitation requires the attacker to convincingly lure an authenticated IEM administrator to a controlled web page while their session is live, then rely on the user clicking at a precisely overlaid element. This is a real but narrow attack path, and its impact is bounded to the actions available to the targeted user's role within IEM.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker creates a malicious webpage that transparently overlays clickable elements atop an invisible iframe loading the victim's active HCL IEM session. The attacker lures an authenticated IEM administrator to the page via phishing; the administrator clicks what appears to be a benign button on the malicious page but unknowingly triggers an IEM action - such as acknowledging an alert, modifying an event rule, or performing a privileged operation - within their authenticated session. No public exploit or proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 21, 2026

Clickjacking exposure in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) allows network-based attackers to embed the application inside a malicious webpage via an iframe and deceive authenticated users into performing unintended administrative or operational actions. All tracked versions under the CPE wildcard are affected, per HCL advisory KB0132378. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the CVSS score of 3.1 (Low) reflects the non-trivial attack complexity and limited integrity-only impact.

RemediationAI

Apply the patch or configuration change recommended in HCL advisory KB0132378 at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0132378 - an exact fixed version number is not specified in the available input data, so consult the advisory directly for the precise release. As a compensating control pending patching, configure the IEM web server or application layer to emit the X-Frame-Options: DENY header on all responses, which instructs browsers to refuse framing from any origin; alternatively, use Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none' for modern browsers. Restricting IEM access to trusted internal networks or VPN also reduces the attacker's ability to deliver a convincing phishing page to targeted users, though it does not eliminate the header absence. Note that server-layer header injection may need to be applied at the reverse proxy or load balancer if the application itself does not support header configuration directly.

Affected VersionsENISA

IntelliOps Event Management 1.1

Affected Packages

euvd intelliops_event_management no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability maps to CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure), specifically the absence of the X-Frame-Options HTTP response header (or an equivalent Content-Security-Policy frame-ancestors directive). Without this header, modern browsers permit any third-party origin to load the IEM application inside an iframe element. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:hclsoftware:intelliops_event_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates the wildcard version range, implying all released versions of HCL IntelliOps Event Management are affected. IEM is an enterprise IT operations and event management platform; its web UI is the attack surface here. The root cause is a missing defensive HTTP header rather than a logic flaw in application code.

Know when Intelliops Event Management gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (HCL) PRIMARY LOW
NVD 4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.3 MEDIUM

Framing an application in an iframe requires no special conditions beyond the missing header, so AC:L; victim interaction is mandatory (UI:R); no confidentiality or availability impact applies.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Jul 30, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
LOW MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Jul 30, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
3.1 (LOW) 4.3 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionNVD

HCL IEM was affected with the Anti Clickjacking XFrame Options Header Missing. It may allow attackers to embed the application in malicious pages and induce unauthorized user actions.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 96% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise IT operations product, limited global footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy