Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain or hold users.view credentials
-
DeliveryAuthenticate to Snipe-IT web interface
-
ExploitRequest /users/{id} or printInventory endpoint
-
ExecutionController checks only users.view gate, skips module permission checks
-
PersistApplication eager-loads license, accessory, consumable relationships
-
ImpactRead restricted cost and order metadata from rendered response
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session in Snipe-IT with at minimum the users.view permission - this is the only prerequisite. No special deployment configuration, non-default feature, or elevated privilege beyond this common role is needed; the flaw exists in the default controller behavior for any Snipe-IT instance prior to 8.6.2. The users.view permission is routinely granted to helpdesk and IT support staff, making the realistic attacker pool broad within any organization using Snipe-IT. What limits exploitation: the attacker must hold valid credentials to the Snipe-IT instance (PR:L - unauthenticated exploitation is not possible); the data exposed is scoped to inventory and cost metadata for items assigned to users the attacker can already view (not arbitrary database access); and there is no integrity or availability impact - exploitation is purely read-only disclosure of financial and asset data. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.3 Medium score with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N is an accurate representation of real-world risk. The confidentiality impact is intentionally scoped to Low - the exposed data is inventory metadata (cost, order information, assigned asset lists) rather than credentials, PII, or system secrets. Attack complexity is Low and no special deployment configuration is needed, meaning any user with a valid users.view account can exploit this immediately. However, the prerequisite of authenticated access (PR:L) meaningfully constrains the attacker pool to internal users or those who have already compromised credentials. No EPSS data was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified; the absence from CISA KEV and no reported POC code suggest exploitation is not occurring at scale. For organizations that use Snipe-IT's granular permission model as a deliberate security boundary - for example, separating helpdesk staff from procurement staff who manage cost-sensitive licensing data - this flaw meaningfully violates that boundary. For small or single-team deployments where users.view holders already have broad access, the practical impact is negligible. The overall priority should be moderate: patch promptly in enterprise multi-role environments, lower urgency for small deployments. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated helpdesk technician with only the users.view role navigates to another user's profile page at /users/{id} or accesses the printInventory endpoint in Snipe-IT before version 8.6.2. The controller loads and renders all assigned licenses (including license keys and seat costs), accessories, and consumables for that user without checking whether the requesting technician holds the corresponding module-level view permissions. The technician can systematically enumerate procurement cost data and license assignments across all users they can view, bypassing the organization's intended role-based access controls for financial and inventory data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 10, 2026
Incorrect authorization in Snipe-IT's UsersController before version 8.6.2 allows any authenticated user holding only the users.view permission to access restricted inventory and procurement metadata - including assigned licenses, accessories, consumables, and associated cost and order data - from modules their direct permissions would otherwise deny. The flaw exists in both the show() and printInventory() controller methods, which enforce authorization only for the user-viewing scope before eagerly loading and rendering related asset relationships without further permission checks. No public exploit exists and this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog, but the low attack complexity and common assignment of users.view to helpdesk staff makes this a realistic insider access-control bypass in enterprise deployments.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Snipe-IT to version 8.6.2 or later, which resolves the incorrect authorization in UsersController::show() and printInventory() - this is the only definitive fix. The patched release is confirmed at https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/releases/tag/v8.6.2 and the specific fix commit is at https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/374f426f0c6bb7a4f129f7b85051cc1da753a0f5. The full security advisory with additional context is available at https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/security/advisories/GHSA-fc33-6w3q-538h. As a compensating control prior to patching, restrict the users.view permission exclusively to staff who are already authorized to view license, accessory, and consumable data - this reduces the exposed population but degrades role separation and may impact helpdesk workflows. There is no configuration flag or feature toggle to disable the affected controller behavior without removing user-viewing functionality entirely, so workarounds are limited.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in composer, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Snipe-IT is an open-source IT asset and license management system built on the Laravel PHP framework, using Eloquent ORM for relational data modeling. CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) describes a failure to verify that an authenticated user has the necessary permissions to access a specific resource, distinct from authentication failure. In this case, UsersController::show() and printInventory() correctly authenticate the request and check for the users.view permission, but then proceed to eager-load Eloquent relationships - licenses, accessories, consumables - and render them in the response without verifying the caller holds the corresponding module-level permissions (e.g., licenses.view, accessories.view, consumables.view). This is a broken object-level authorization pattern: the controller trusts that passing the initial gate check implies broader data access rights. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N reflects a network-accessible web endpoint requiring only a low-privilege session with no attack complexity or user interaction needed. No CPE string was provided in the intelligence data.
Know when Snipe It gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Network-accessible web endpoint requires only a low-privilege authenticated session (users.view role); confidentiality impact is limited to partial inventory metadata with no integrity or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (github).
CVSS VectorVendor: github
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. Prior to 8.6.2, UsersController::show() and printInventory() authorize only user viewing before loading and rendering assigned license, accessory, and consumable relationships, allowing an authenticated user with only users.view to see inventory and cost/order metadata from modules that direct permissions would otherwise deny. This issue is fixed in version 8.6.2.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository snipe/snipe-it prior to v.6.2.3. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8),
In Snipe-IT, versions v3.0-alpha to v5.3.7 are vulnerable to Host Header Injection. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
snipe-it is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remot
snipe-it is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remot
Two-factor authentication bypass in Snipe-IT (all releases before 8.7.0) allows an attacker who already knows a victim's
Session Fixation in GitHub repository snipe/snipe-it prior to 6.0.10. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.0), this vulnerability
Old sessions are not blocked by the login enable function. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.4), this vulnerability is remotel
snipe-it is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.2), this vulnerability is remo
Broken authorization in Snipe-IT before 8.6.2 lets an authenticated non-admin user who holds users.view and users.edit -
Privilege escalation via authorization bypass in Snipe-IT versions prior to 8.6.0 allows any authenticated user holding
Improper permission handling in Snipe-IT before 8.6.0 lets a privileged user strip another user's administrative or gran
Snipe-IT before 7.0.10 allows remote code execution (associated with cookie serialization) when an attacker knows the AP
EUVD-2026-42994
GHSA-fc33-6w3q-538h
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB