Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain low-privilege local access (app or shell)
-
DeliveryCraft malformed comment-line input for AnnotationProcessor
-
ExploitSubmit input to AppendCommentLine triggering CWE-20 validation failure
-
ExecutionExploit improper processing to escalate privileges
-
ImpactAchieve full C/I/A impact on device
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local code execution on an affected Android device with at minimum low-privilege app-level access (consistent with PR:L in the CVSS vector). The attacker must be able to supply crafted input to the AppendCommentLine function of AnnotationProcessor.cpp - which may require either running in a build environment context or triggering the annotation processor through an app or system service. No user interaction is required once the attacker has device access. Limiting factors: AV:L constrains this to actors with physical or local software access to the device; S:U means the privilege escalation is bounded to the vulnerable system's own privilege boundary and does not directly break out to other systems. The 'supply chain risk' framing is not independently confirmed and may indicate the processor runs in build pipelines rather than runtime user space - if so, exploitation conditions may differ from a standard local app exploit. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H scores 7.8, indicating local exploitation with low complexity, low-privilege requirements, and no user interaction needed. Real-world risk is meaningful given Android's ubiquity, but the AV:L constraint limits exposure to scenarios where the attacker already has local code execution (e.g., a malicious app or an insider). No KEV listing and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. The 'supply chain risk' framing is an unusual qualifier in CVE descriptions and warrants independent verification - it may elevate the effective impact beyond a single device if the annotation processor runs in CI/CD or shared build environments. EPSS data is not available in the provided intelligence. The combination of no required user interaction and low-privilege local access makes this moderately automatable once device foothold is achieved. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker installs a malicious application on an Android 16 or 17 device that crafts specially malformed comment-line input targeting the AnnotationProcessor's AppendCommentLine function. The malformed input passes validation checks and triggers privilege escalation, granting the attacker elevated system access without any user interaction beyond the initial app installation. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the low complexity rating indicates exploitation would be straightforward once the trigger input is understood. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 08, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Android 16, 16-QPR2, and 17 stems from improper input validation in the AppendCommentLine function of AnnotationProcessor.cpp. A low-privileged local attacker can exploit this CWE-20 flaw without user interaction to achieve full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, consistent with a complete privilege escalation on the device. Google's Android Security Bulletin for September 2026 (2026-09-01) addresses this issue; the description's explicit 'supply chain risk' framing is atypical and suggests the vulnerable code participates in a build or annotation-processing pipeline where malicious input could propagate into compiled artifacts.
RemediationAI
Apply the Android September 2026 Security Patch Level (2026-09-01) as released by Google, available through OEM firmware updates and the Android Open Source Project. Consult the official advisory at https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2026/2026-09-01 for patch confirmation and patch level verification. No exact patched build number was specified in the provided data; verify the security patch level on updated devices (Settings > About phone > Android security update). If patching is delayed for managed fleets, restrict installation of untrusted applications and enforce work profile isolation to reduce the local-attacker attack surface. No workaround short of patching is known from available sources.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
AnnotationProcessor.cpp is part of Android's build or compiler toolchain - the AppendCommentLine function processes source-level annotations or comments during compilation. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) at this stage means the processor fails to sanitize comment content before use, enabling injection of attacker-controlled data into processed output. The 'supply chain risk' language in the description suggests the flaw could allow crafted input to affect downstream build artifacts, not merely the immediate process. Affected versions per EUVD: Android 16-QPR2, Android 16, and Android 17; no CPE string was provided but the reporter is security@android.com (Google Android Security Team), confirming Google as the vendor.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local vector confirmed by description; PR:L reflects low-privilege app access needed; full C/I/A consistent with local privilege escalation to system/root.
Primary rating from Vendor (android).
CVSS VectorVendor: android
DescriptionCVE.org
In AppendCommentLine of AnnotationProcessor.cpp, there is a possible supply chain risk due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Executive ViewAI
Android 16, 16-QPR2, and 17 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in AnnotationProcessor.cpp that allows low-privileged users to fully compromise device confidentiality, integrity, and availability without user interaction. With no current patch available, organizations deploying these Android versions in corporate or BYOD environments face immediate risk to sensitive mobile device data and system integrity.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: restricting physical access to affected devices, enforcing strict local privilege controls to limit attacker capabilities, disabling annotation-processing and build-pipeline features that may trigger the vulnerability, implementing enhanced detection and alerting for privilege escalation attempts on affected devices, and maintaining offline backups to mitigate data loss from potential integrity or availability attacks.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-74017
GHSA-xg3f-rx44-cw93
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB