Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain local low-privileged access to UniconOS endpoint
-
ExploitInvoke vulnerable OS component
-
ExecutionTrigger persistent command execution
-
ImpactRead sensitive data / retain foothold
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires LOCAL access to a device running Citrix UniconOS with at least low-privilege authenticated access (AV:L/PR:L), and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). It is NOT remotely exploitable over the network, which is the primary limiting factor - an attacker must already have a foothold or valid low-privilege credentials on the endpoint. Affected deployments are UniconOS versions before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2; systems patched to those versions are not exploitable. The description does not name a specific optional feature or non-default setting, so the condition is possession of local low-privileged access to an unpatched UniconOS device rather than a particular configuration toggle. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-risk, locally-exploitable issue rather than an urgent widespread threat. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) indicates a LOCAL attack vector with LOW complexity and LOW privileges required but NO user interaction, yielding a MEDIUM base score of 6.9. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code supplied in the intelligence, so exploitation probability signals are absent - this is not confirmed as actively exploited. The impact profile is notable for internal inconsistency: the CVSS declares HIGH confidentiality impact (VC:H) with only LOW integrity and availability (VI:L/VA:L), and the input Tags label this 'Information Disclosure', yet the CVE title describes 'Persistent Command Execution', which would normally imply high integrity/availability impact - this disagreement should be verified with Citrix before final triage. Because the vector is local and requires authenticated low-privilege access, this is better treated as a post-compromise privilege/persistence or data-exposure concern on affected endpoints than as a remotely wormable priority; the local AV meaningfully caps real-world exposure despite the 'command execution' framing. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged user already able to log in to or run code on a Citrix UniconOS thin-client endpoint abuses the flaw to execute commands that persist on the device and/or to read data they should not be able to access. Because the vector is local (AV:L) with low privileges (PR:L) and no user interaction, the attacker needs an existing foothold on the device rather than network reach. No public exploit identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Persistent command execution in Citrix UniconOS lets a locally authenticated low-privilege user plant commands that survive normal operation and execute in a privileged context, giving the attacker sustained access to data and code on the endpoint. The flaw affects UniconOS releases before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2; it is not remotely exploitable and requires an existing foothold or valid low-privilege credentials on the device, with no user interaction needed. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been reported, and the vendor has released a patch, making this a moderate-risk, locally-scoped issue rather than an urgent widespread threat.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch is available: upgrade Citrix UniconOS to 2607.2 CR or later on the Current Release track, or to 2603 LTSR CU2 or later on the LTSR track, following the instructions in Citrix advisory CTX697187 (https://support.citrix.com/support-home/kbsearch/article?articleNumber=CTX697187). Because the vulnerability is local and requires low-privilege authenticated access (AV:L/PR:L), the highest-value compensating control until patching is to reduce the number of accounts that can log on locally to UniconOS devices: restrict interactive local logon to a small, audited administrative group, remove shared or generic low-privilege local accounts, and enforce per-user credentials, accepting the operational trade-off of tighter help-desk and field-service workflows. Where local access cannot be restricted, enforce least privilege so that no local account holds rights beyond its role, since a compromised low-privilege account is the documented prerequisite; this does not remove the bug but lowers the value of a foothold. Additionally, apply host-based monitoring for unexpected persistence artifacts (new startup or scheduled entries, modified service definitions, and unexpected child processes spawning from low-privileged sessions) and alert on their creation, recognizing that this is detection rather than prevention. If patching cannot be completed during a maintenance window, isolate affected devices so that local user populations are trusted and constrained, and prioritize the update for any UniconOS instance where low-privilege local access is broadly granted.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
UniconOS is a Citrix-managed operating system for endpoint and appliance-style deployments, distributed on two release tracks: a rapid Current Release (CR) track and a long-term servicing LTSR track with cumulative updates (CU). The reported defect is a persistence mechanism in the OS that permits command execution to survive ordinary runtime operations, which is why Citrix classifies the issue as 'Persistent Command Execution' rather than a one-shot code-execution bug. The source data does not assign a CWE, so no authoritative root-cause class can be cited; the observed behavior (locally injected, persistence-capable command execution) maps most closely to command-injection/improper-privilege-management style weaknesses (e.g. CWE-78, CWE-269), but that mapping is an inference and not a vendor-confirmed classification. The assessed CVSS:3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L indicates the attack surface is the local device: the exploit chain begins with low-privilege authenticated access on the endpoint, requires no user interaction, and does not cross a privilege boundary beyond the vulnerable component (S:U). Impact is weighted toward confidentiality (C:H) with limited integrity and availability effects (I:L/A:L), consistent with an attacker reading or exfiltrating privileged data and retaining a persistence foothold rather than crashing or fully reconfiguring the system.
Know when Citrix gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Local vector and low-privilege authenticated access justify AV:L and PR:L with AC:L and no UI; confidentiality impact is high while integrity/availability are low, matching the vendor vector.
Primary rating from Vendor (citrix).
CVSS VectorVendor: citrix
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Persistent Command Execution
This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Citrix Application Delivery Controller and Gateway contain a directory traversal vulnerability allowing unauthenticated
Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exploited massively in s
GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which
Sensitive information disclosure in Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway - widely known as 'Citrix Bleed' - allows
GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of
Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN devices through v9.1.2.26.561201 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands as r
Memory overread in Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway (versions before 14.1-43.56 and 13.1-58.32) lets remote un
The x86-64 kernel system-call functionality in Xen 4.1.2 and earlier, as used in Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier and
Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway deployments running builds prior to 14.1-73.37 or 13.1-64.23 (including the c
Unauthenticated command execution in Citrix NetScaler ADC (before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, and the corresponding F
A remote, unauthenticated attacker can cause a denial-of-service condition on NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway applia
Unauthenticated information disclosure in Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway (versions 14.1 before 73.32 and 13.
EUVD-2026-100753
GHSA-jq59-m47r-c584
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB