Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable CSRF, no attacker auth (PR:N), but requires victim owner to click (UI:R); full org control yields C/I/A:H within the same security scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/gogs/gogs).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/gogs/gogs
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
In Gogs 0.14.1, organization team member management can be performed via GET requests without CSRF protection. If a victim who is an organization owner is logged in and is tricked into visiting a crafted link, an attacker-controlled user can be added to the Owners team. As a result, the attacker gains organization owner-equivalent privileges.
---
Description
When a victim is logged in as an organization owner, team member management endpoints are exposed via routes reachable by GET requests, allowing state-changing operations without a CSRF token.
Team action route allows GET
internal/cmd/web.go:390
m.Route("/teams/:team/action/:action", "GET,POST", org.TeamsAction)CSRF validation is applied only to POST requests
Because the global CSRF check is limited to POST requests, state-changing operations reached via GET bypass CSRF protection entirely.
internal/context/auth.go:56-61
if !options.SignOutRequired && !options.DisableCSRF &&
c.Req.Method == "POST" && !isAPIPath(c.Req.URL.Path) {
csrf.Validate(c.Context, c.csrf)
if c.Written() {
return
}
}TeamsAction performs state changes regardless of HTTP method
TeamsAction does not branch on the HTTP method. Instead, it performs state-changing operations (such as adding or removing members) based solely on query parameters (uid, uname) and the :action path parameter. Since the route explicitly allows GET, the add action can be executed via GET.
internal/route/org/teams.go:38-83
func TeamsAction(c *context.Context) {
uid := com.StrTo(c.Query("uid")).MustInt64()
if uid == 0 {
c.Redirect(c.Org.OrgLink + "/teams")
return
}
page := c.Query("page")
var err error
switch c.Params(":action") {
case "add":
if !c.Org.IsOwner {
c.NotFound()
return
}
uname := c.Query("uname")
var u *database.User
u, err = database.Handle.Users().GetByUsername(c.Req.Context(), uname)
// ...
err = c.Org.Team.AddMember(u.ID)
page = "team"
}
}Adding a user to the Owners team grants organization owner privileges
When a user joins the Owners team, OrgUser.IsOwner is set to true. Therefore, adding a user to the Owners team directly results in granting organization owner-equivalent privileges.
internal/database/org_team.go:566-576
ou := new(OrgUser)
if _, err = sess.Where("uid = ?", userID).
And("org_id = ?", orgID).Get(ou); err != nil {
return err
}
ou.NumTeams++
if t.IsOwnerTeam() {
ou.IsOwner = true
}
if _, err = sess.ID(ou.ID).AllCols().Update(ou); err != nil {
return err
}Related issue: organization member actions are also state-changing via GET
For reference, organization member management endpoints are also exposed as GET routes that perform state changes without CSRF protection.
internal/cmd/web.go:382
m.Get("/members/action/:action", org.MembersAction)MembersAction similarly does not branch on HTTP method and performs state-changing operations (public/private toggle, remove, leave) based on query parameters and the :action path parameter.
internal/route/org/members.go:31-71
func MembersAction(c *context.Context) {
uid := com.StrTo(c.Query("uid")).MustInt64()
if uid == 0 {
c.Redirect(c.Org.OrgLink + "/members")
return
}
org := c.Org.Organization
var err error
switch c.Params(":action") {
case "private":
err = database.ChangeOrgUserStatus(org.ID, uid, false)
case "public":
err = database.ChangeOrgUserStatus(org.ID, uid, true)
case "remove":
err = org.RemoveMember(uid)
case "leave":
err = org.RemoveMember(c.User.ID)
}
}---
Steps to Reproduce
- Prepare a target user account to be added (e.g.,
attacker). - Confirm that the victim user is an owner of the target organization (e.g.,
org3) and is logged in. - Cause the victim’s browser to perform a top-level navigation to the following URL:
http://localhost:10880/org/org3/teams/owners/action/add?uid=1&uname=attacker<img width="2019" height="322" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/342a627a-04e8-47bd-818a-9c2b05a75446" />
- After the request completes, verify that the
attackeruser can access:
http://localhost:10880/org/org3/settingsconfirming that organization owner privileges have been obtained.
<img width="2010" height="285" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/03945bb1-e9c5-4e42-ad3a-9f6d63b7d86d" />
<img width="2016" height="893" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/55d7db13-52cf-471b-a6d3-aa4186c8b547" />
---
Impact
Successful exploitation allows an attacker to obtain organization owner privileges, resulting in:
- Full control over organization repositories, settings, and members
- Unauthorized access to private repositories (confidentiality impact)
- Modification or deletion of repositories and settings (integrity impact)
- Repository deletion or disruption leading to service unavailability (availability impact)
AnalysisAI
Cross-site request forgery in Gogs 0.14.1 lets a remote attacker escalate to organization owner by tricking a logged-in owner into loading a crafted URL. The /teams/:team/action/:action route accepts GET requests and the global CSRF check only fires on POST, so an add action against the Owners team executes without a token. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Requires (1) a Gogs instance running a version prior to 0.14.3, (2) a victim who is an *organization owner* (regular members cannot add to Owners - `TeamsAction` enforces `c.Org.IsOwner`), (3) the victim is currently logged into Gogs in the same browser, and (4) the victim performs a top-level navigation or otherwise loads an attacker-supplied URL on the Gogs origin. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | CVSS 3.1 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects high impact but the UI:R component is load-bearing - exploitation requires a logged-in organization owner to follow an attacker-crafted link, so this is a targeted social-engineering attack rather than an opportunistic RCE. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker registers a normal Gogs account, then posts a link (in an issue comment, email, or external chat) such as `http://gogs.example.com/org/acme/teams/owners/action/add?uid=42&uname=attacker` to a known organization owner. When the owner clicks it while logged in, the browser issues an authenticated GET, no CSRF token is checked, and the attacker is added to the Owners team - yielding full control over private repositories, settings, and members. … |
| Remediation | Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Gogs 0.14.3 (https://github.com/gogs/gogs/releases/tag/v0.14.3), which restricts `/members/action/:action`, `/teams/:team/action/:action`, and `/teams/:team/action/repo/:action` to POST only via PR https://github.com/gogs/gogs/pull/8321 (commit 070df61ecd14c75b0aca93090f860b87ab17ac19). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours: Inventory all Gogs deployments and identify systems running version 0.14.1. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Same weakness CWE-352 – Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-39069
GHSA-pwx3-qcgw-vh7h