Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable endpoint with low complexity, requires an authenticated tenant account (PR:L), no confidentiality impact but full modify/delete of other tenants' webhooks (I:H/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Incorrect access control in the /{form}/webhooks/{webhook} endpoint of Deck9 Input v2.0.1 allows authenticated attackers to arbitrarily modify or delete another tenant's webhook via a crafted request.
AnalysisAI
Cross-tenant webhook tampering in Deck9 Input v2.0.1 lets any authenticated user modify or delete webhooks belonging to other tenants by targeting the /{form}/webhooks/{webhook} endpoint with a crafted request. Because the endpoint fails to verify that the requesting tenant owns the referenced webhook (a classic broken-access-control / IDOR pattern), attackers can silently redirect, corrupt, or destroy another organization's integration data. Publicly available exploit code exists (proof-of-concept gist), though EPSS remains low at 0.15% and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Technical ContextAI
Deck9 Input is a hosted form/data-collection platform where webhooks are used to push submitted form data to external systems. The vulnerable route /{form}/webhooks/{webhook} exposes webhook objects by identifier without enforcing that the authenticated caller's tenant matches the webhook's owning tenant. This is CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) manifesting as a horizontal, cross-tenant authorization failure: the server authenticates the user but does not authorize the specific object, so the {webhook} path parameter can be substituted with another tenant's identifier. The supplied CPE (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*) is a placeholder and provides no additional product-matching detail beyond the product/version in the description.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identified at time of analysis, so treat remediation as compensating controls until Deck9 publishes a fixed release. The core fix must enforce object-level authorization on /{form}/webhooks/{webhook} so that a webhook can only be read, modified, or deleted by its owning tenant - verify tenant ownership server-side rather than trusting the {webhook} identifier. As interim controls: restrict or monitor access to webhook management endpoints (e.g., gateway/WAF rules that log and rate-limit requests to /*/webhooks/* and flag cross-tenant identifier patterns), reduce the number of accounts holding webhook-management privileges, and periodically audit/back up webhook configurations so unauthorized modification or deletion can be detected and restored (trade-off: these do not prevent exploitation, only limit blast radius and speed recovery). Track https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50875 for an official fixed version and apply it once released.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
Same weakness CWE-284 – Improper Access Control
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-36773
GHSA-42j4-px2f-mhr5