Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as Company Manager role
-
DeliveryReach GAPTEQ Designer web interface
-
ExploitAbuse improper privilege enforcement
-
ExecutionEscalate to full administrative privileges
-
ImpactTake total control of application and data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The concrete prerequisite named in the CVE is abuse of the GAPTEQ 'Company Manager' role, so realistic exploitation requires the attacker to hold or acquire a Company Manager account on a GAPTEQ Designer v3.5 instance and to have network reach to its web interface. This role requirement is the primary limiting factor - despite the published PR:N (unauthenticated) metric, the description implies an authenticated, role-scoped starting point rather than anonymous access, which meaningfully narrows the exploit population to environments where lower-tier delegated admins are not fully trusted. |
| Impact | The signals conflict and should be weighed carefully. The published CVSS 9.8 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) implies fully unauthenticated network exploitation, yet the description ties the flaw to abuse of the 'Company Manager role,' which strongly implies the attacker must already hold that authenticated role - meaning PR:N is likely optimistic and the true privilege requirement is PR:L; verify with the vendor. SSVC raises priority (Exploitation: PoC, Automatable: yes, Technical Impact: total) and a public PoC repository exists, but the low EPSS (0.21%) and absence from CISA KEV indicate no confirmed widespread active exploitation to date. Because a working PoC is public and the impact is total, the practical takeaway is that even a mid-sized municipal IT team in olsztyn should treat a reachable GAPTEQ Designer instance as an urgent internal-hardening priority, while recognizing that real-world risk is bounded by the platform's limited deployment footprint and the probable need for an existing Company Manager account. Net: a genuine high-priority issue for organizations running GAPTEQ, but likely role-gated rather than a fully anonymous internet-wide threat. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who obtains or is granted a 'Company Manager' role account in a GAPTEQ Designer 3.5 instance manipulates the role's functionality to escalate to higher (e.g., global administrative) privileges, gaining full control over the application's data and configuration. Because a public PoC exists and the CVSS complexity is low (AC:L), the technique is repeatable and, per SSVC, automatable once access to the role is available. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 18, 2026
Privilege escalation in GAPTEQ Designer v3.5 allows a remote attacker to abuse the Company Manager role to gain elevated privileges, per CWE-269 (improper privilege management). Publicly available exploit code exists (referenced on GitHub), and CISA's SSVC framework rates the technical impact as total and the flaw as automatable, though it is not listed in CISA KEV and EPSS remains low (0.21%, 11th percentile). The scope of affected deployments is limited to the GAPTEQ low-code application platform rather than a widely embedded library.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; the references point only to the vendor homepage (https://gapteq.com/en/), the NVD record (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50774), and researcher PoC material (https://github.com/Henkel-CyberVM/CVEs/tree/main/CVE-2026-50774), none of which cite a fixed build. Contact GAPTEQ directly to obtain a patched release beyond v3.5 and monitor the vendor site for an advisory. As compensating controls, restrict and audit assignment of the Company Manager role to the minimum set of trusted operators (reducing who can trigger the escalation), place GAPTEQ Designer behind network segmentation or a VPN/allowlist so the management interface is not broadly reachable (trade-off: added access friction for legitimate admins), enable and review authentication and role-change logging to detect abuse, and treat every existing Company Manager account as potentially able to reach full-privilege operations until patched.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
GAPTEQ is a commercial low-code/no-code business application platform used to build database-driven web forms and enterprise apps; the Designer component is its authoring/administration environment. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), meaning the application does not correctly enforce the boundary between what a given role may do and what it should be restricted from doing. Specifically, the 'Company Manager' role - a delegated administrative role intended to manage a company/tenant scope - can be leveraged to obtain privileges beyond its intended authorization level. The provided CPE string (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*) is a placeholder with no real vendor/product tokens, so exact affected-configuration matching cannot be derived from NVD CPE data and must rely on the vendor's own versioning (v3.5).
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable web app with low complexity, but the Company Manager role is required so PR:L not PR:N; privilege escalation yields full C/I/A within the app (S:U).
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
An issue in GAPTEQ Designer v.3.5 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the Company Manger role.
Executive ViewAI
GAPTEQ Designer v3.5 contains a critical remote privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2026-50774) enabling attackers to gain complete administrative access through Company Manager role manipulation. Organizations deploying this low-code platform face total system compromise and must immediately implement containment measures, as vendor patches are not available. A complete inventory of GAPTEQ usage is required to assess and mitigate business exposure.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: implement network segmentation to isolate GAPTEQ instances and restrict administrative access; disable Company Manager role entirely if operationally feasible, or restrict its use to critical functions only; enable detailed audit logging of all privilege-related activities; deploy intrusion detection rules to flag Company Manager abuse patterns; and consider air-gapping critical GAPTEQ deployments until vendor patches are released.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
EUVD-2026-60352
GHSA-f434-qw6r-6r84
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB