Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCompromise device or gain privileged access
-
DeliveryExtract stored credential hash
-
ExploitCrack weak hash offline (dictionary/brute-force)
-
ExecutionRecover plaintext admin password
-
PersistAuthenticate to device management
-
ImpactAccess management functions per recovered privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess the stored password hash, which per the description is only obtainable 'through system compromise or privileged access' to the Deco M5 v1 - consistent with the CVSS AV:L and PR:H metrics. The exact prerequisite is read access to the location where credentials are hashed and stored (device filesystem/NVRAM or a configuration backup). Limiting factors that reduce realistic risk: this is not remotely reachable (local vector), it demands high existing privileges, AC:H reflects the non-trivial cracking effort, no user interaction is involved (UI:N), and the weakness is scoped to the Deco M5 v1 hardware revision. A strong, high-entropy password materially blunts the offline-cracking step even where the hash is exposed. |
| Impact | This is a meaningful but conditional weakness, not a top-tier emergency. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector rates it 7.1 (High) but its metrics tell the real story: AV:L and PR:H mean the attacker must already have local access and high privileges (or an existing system compromise) to obtain the hash before this flaw provides any value, and AC:H reflects the additional work of cracking. There is no EPSS score in the provided data, no POC, and no KEV listing, so there is no evidence of active or automatable exploitation - the SSVC-style read is 'not automatable, requires prior access.' Note two data conflicts to verify: (1) the input's Tags label this 'Authentication Bypass,' but the description and CWE-916 describe credential-hash weakness enabling offline cracking, not a direct bypass - the tag appears inaccurate; and (2) the vendor 4.0 vector claims full VC:H/VI:H/VA:H impact, yet the description explicitly states 'The primary security impact is loss of confidentiality,' suggesting integrity/availability impact is overstated. Treat this as a defense-in-depth hardening issue that raises the cost of an already-privileged compromise rather than a standalone remotely exploitable vulnerability. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already gained privileged or local access to a Deco M5 v1 unit - for example via a separate firmware flaw, a stolen configuration backup, or physical/administrative access - extracts the stored credential hash from the device. Because the hash uses a weak, fast algorithm, the attacker cracks it offline with a wordlist or GPU brute-force and recovers the plaintext admin password, then reuses it to log into the device management interface and any accounts that share the password. No public POC is identified, and the high attack complexity and local vector make this a follow-on step in a larger intrusion rather than an initial-access technique. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026
Credential disclosure in TP-Link Deco M5 v1 mesh routers stems from a weak (computationally cheap) password-hashing scheme used to store local user credentials, letting an attacker who has already obtained the stored hash recover the plaintext password via offline brute-force or dictionary attacks. Affected devices are the Deco M5 v1 hardware revision, and successful cracking yields access to device management functions scoped to the recovered account's privileges. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; the CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H) reflects that it is a post-compromise credential-recovery weakness rather than a remote entry point.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the latest Deco M5 v1 firmware from TP-Link's download portal (https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/download/deco-m5/v1/#Firmware or the EN mirror), noting that the provided data does not confirm an exact first-fixed firmware version - verify the fixed build directly with TP-Link before relying on it. Because exploitation requires an attacker to first obtain the stored hash through device compromise or privileged access, the most effective compensating controls target that precondition: set a long, high-entropy admin/Wi-Fi password so that even a cheaply computed hash resists dictionary attacks; disable remote/cloud management and any WAN-side administration so the management plane is not reachable from the internet (trade-off: loss of remote app management convenience); segment the router's management interface onto a trusted VLAN/subnet and restrict local network access to it; and rotate all device credentials after any suspected compromise since old hashes remain crackable. Review the vendor FAQ at https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5190/ for model-specific hardening steps.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-916 (Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort): credentials are stored with a fast or unsalted hashing primitive rather than a deliberately slow, salted key-derivation function (e.g., bcrypt, scrypt, Argon2, or high-iteration PBKDF2). On embedded consumer networking gear like the Deco M5 mesh system, such hashes typically live in NVRAM or a config/backup blob on the device filesystem. Because the hash can be computed cheaply, an attacker with a copy of it can test billions of candidate passwords offline. The single affected component per CPE is cpe:2.3:a:tp-link_systems_inc.:deco_m5_deco_m5_v1, i.e., the first hardware/firmware generation of the Deco M5 whole-home mesh Wi-Fi product.
Know when Deco M5 Deco M5 V1 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Attacker needs local, high-privilege access to obtain the hash (AV:L/PR:H), offline cracking adds effort (AC:H), and impact is confidentiality-only per the description (C:H, I:N, A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (TPLink).
CVSS VectorVendor: TPLink
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
TP-Link Deco M5 v1 uses a weak password hashing mechanism to store user credentials. An attacker who obtains the password hash through system compromise or privileged access could perform brute-force or dictionary attacks.
Successful exploitation may result in disclosure of authentication credentials, enabling unauthorized access to device management functions, depending on the privileges associated with the recovered password. The primary security impact is loss of confidentiality.
Executive ViewAI
TP-Link Deco M5 v1 mesh routers contain a credential disclosure vulnerability enabling attackers who gain access to password hashes to recover plaintext credentials via offline brute-force attacks, potentially granting unauthorized access to device management functions and network infrastructure configuration.
Enforce strict physical access controls to prevent unauthorized device handling; restrict management interface access to authorized administrative users via network-level controls and firewall rules; segment management traffic onto a protected administrative network; enable and monitor device management logs for unauthorized configuration changes; consider temporary air-gapping of affected routers pending firmware remediation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
EUVD-2026-44362
GHSA-6vqq-hcvj-cx94
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB