Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to Zimbra mailbox
-
ExploitCreate Sieve notify-action filter rule
-
ExecutionBypass disabled-forwarding policy
-
ImpactExfiltrate email content and headers to external address
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a valid authenticated mailbox account on the Zimbra server (PR:L) and an environment where the administrator has explicitly DISABLED mail forwarding as a policy control - the vulnerability lets the user defeat that specific restriction. The concrete prerequisite is the ability to create a Sieve filter using the 'notify' action; exploitation hinges on Sieve filtering being available to the user. Limiting factors: it is not exploitable by unauthenticated/anonymous attackers, it yields confidentiality impact only (no integrity or availability effect), and it is primarily meaningful in deployments that rely on disabled-forwarding as a data-loss-prevention control rather than default installs that permit forwarding anyway. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-risk authorization flaw, not a critical pre-auth RCE. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 6.5) is internally consistent with the description: exploitation is network-reachable and low-complexity but requires an already-authenticated low-privilege mailbox user (PR:L), and the impact is confidentiality-only (C:H, I:N, A:N) - matching a data-exfiltration/policy-bypass issue rather than system compromise. CWE-863 (improper authorization) correctly characterizes it as a policy-enforcement bypass rather than a true authentication bypass. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were supplied in the intelligence, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis; the absence of these signals suggests this is a priority driven by impact-to-specific-tenants (email confidentiality / insider or compromised-account exfiltration) rather than mass internet-scale exploitation. The 'Authentication Bypass' tag conflicts with the description, which explicitly says the actor is an authenticated user - this is an authorization/policy bypass, which should be reconciled before downstream triage. Net: real but targeted concern for multi-tenant and privacy-sensitive Zimbra deployments, not an emergency-patch-everywhere issue absent exploitation evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated Zimbra user whose administrator has disabled mail forwarding configures a Sieve filter with a notify action pointing at an attacker-controlled external address, causing copies of incoming email content and headers to be silently exfiltrated despite the forwarding restriction. This is especially relevant for a malicious insider or an account that has been phished/compromised. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and the low attack complexity (AC:L) means the Sieve rule is straightforward to craft once a user is logged in. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
An authenticated mailbox user on Zimbra Collaboration Suite can defeat an administrator's policy that disables mail forwarding by creating a Sieve filter that uses the 'notify' action to copy message bodies and headers to an arbitrary external address. The flaw is an incorrect-authorization issue (CWE-863) scored CVSS 6.5 with vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, meaning exploitation requires a valid account (PR:L), is network-reachable, needs no user interaction, and yields confidentiality impact only - no integrity or availability effect. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV; the risk is concentrated in deployments that rely on disabling forwarding as a data-loss-prevention or exfiltration control, rather than in default installs where forwarding is already permitted.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch or fixed version was identified in the available data at time of analysis; Zimbra's advisory page at https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories should be checked for the patched build and applied as soon as a fixed release is published. Until then, the most direct compensating control is to disable Sieve filtering for the affected users, or to remove/curate the server-side 'notify' capability at the filter-manager level, on deployments that depend on disabled forwarding as a DLP control - the trade-off is that legitimate users lose all Sieve-based filtering, including vacation replies and server-side sorting. Organisations that cannot disable Sieve entirely should restrict it to users who are explicitly permitted to forward, and pair that with outbound SMTP egress restrictions or content monitoring so that copies of message bodies sent to arbitrary external addresses are logged and blocked; setting the forwarding policy itself has no effect on this path, since the flaw is precisely that it is bypassed. Finally, audit existing mailbox Sieve scripts for 'notify' actions and monitor for filter changes made shortly after the forwarding restriction was applied, as these are the observable indicators of exploitation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Zimbra filters inbound mail server-side using Sieve, the IETF mail-filtering language (RFC 5228), whose extensions include the 'notify' action for pushing message content to a specified address. Zimbra administrators can turn off ordinary mail forwarding as a policy/DLP measure, but that control is enforced at the forwarding feature level; the Sieve notify path is a separate code path that was not subjected to the same authorization check, producing the CWE-863 incorrect-authorization class. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:zimbra:zimbra_collaboration_suite:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* carries a wildcard version, so no specific release is bounded by the identifier - the practical precondition is that Sieve filtering (and the notify action) is available to the mailbox user while the administrator has explicitly disabled forwarding. Because the attacker must already hold a mailbox credential to place a Sieve rule, the flaw is an authenticated policy-bypass rather than a pre-auth issue, and it is primarily a data-exfiltration/confidentiality concern for organisations that treat 'forwarding disabled' as a guarantee.
Know when Zimbra Collaboration Suite gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Authenticated low-privilege mailbox user (PR:L) over the network (AV:N) trivially crafts a Sieve rule (AC:L); impact is email-confidentiality exfiltration only, so C:H, I:N, A:N, S:U.
Primary rating from Vendor (rapid7).
CVSS VectorVendor: rapid7
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A policy-enforcement flaw in Zimbra Collaboration Suite allows an authenticated user to bypass disabled mail forwarding by using a Sieve notify action to send copies of email content and headers to an arbitrary address.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Zimbra Collaboration Suite
View allAn issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerabi
Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0 has mboximport functionality that receives a ZIP archive and extracts fi
Zimbra Collaboration (aka ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0 has mboximport functionality that receives a ZIP archive and extracts file
Zimbra Collaboration (aka ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0 allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject arbitrary memcache commands i
Directory traversal vulnerability in /res/I18nMsg,AjxMsg,ZMsg,ZmMsg,AjxKeys,ZmKeys,ZdMsg,Ajx%20TemplateMsg.js.zgz in Zim
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the ZmMailMsgView.getAttachmentLinkHtml function in Zimbra Collaboration Sui
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 9.0 and 10.0 and 10.1. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.4), this vuln
Cross-site scripting in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) Classic UI allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript within a
Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 10.x contains a stored XSS vulnerability in the Classic UI that allows attackers to exe
Due to an issue with incorrect sudo permissions, Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) suffers from a local privilege escalat
Zimbra Collaboration Suite before 8.6 patch 13, 8.7.x before 8.7.11 patch 10, and 8.8.x before 8.8.10 patch 7 or 8.8.x b
The postjournal service in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 8.8.15 Patch 46, 9 before 9.0.0 Patch 41, 10 before 10.0.9,
EUVD-2026-95098
GHSA-p88h-r6ph-r7j6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB