Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain local admin on Windows host
-
DeliveryStage tampered boot component or BCD entry
-
ExploitTrigger reboot to invoke Boot Manager
-
ExecutionProtection mechanism fails to validate
-
PersistPre-OS malicious code executes outside trust chain
-
ImpactInstall bootkit beneath OS defenses
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local access to the target system and pre-existing high privileges (administrative rights on Windows), per the CVSS vector AV:L/PR:H - this is not a remote or unauthenticated attack and cannot be triggered over the network or by a standard user. The attacker must be able to invoke Boot Manager code paths, which in practice means the ability to modify boot configuration data, EFI system partition contents, or BCD entries, and then trigger a reboot. No user interaction is required (UI:N), and the attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once admin is held the bypass is reliable. Limiting factors that reduce realistic risk: the admin-privilege requirement means this is a post-compromise capability rather than an entry vector, and systems enforcing BitLocker with TPM+PIN or Measured Boot remote attestation may detect the tampering even if the bypass itself succeeds. |
| Impact | The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N tells a nuanced story: exploitation requires local access and pre-existing high privileges (administrative), but once those conditions are met the attack is low-complexity, requires no user interaction, and crosses a security scope boundary with high confidentiality and integrity impact. This profile is characteristic of post-compromise persistence or tamper-resistance bypass rather than initial access - an attacker who already has admin would use this to defeat Secure Boot, BitLocker, or Virtualization-Based Security to install a bootkit or evade endpoint controls. EPSS data was not provided in the input, the CVE is not present on CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, so this is best treated as a defense-in-depth patching priority for high-assurance fleets rather than an emergency. The 'authorized attacker' wording in the description aligns with PR:H in the vector, so signals are internally consistent. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained administrative privileges on a Windows endpoint - for example through a phishing-delivered token theft followed by UAC bypass - writes a crafted boot configuration or replaces a boot component, then reboots the machine; the flawed protection mechanism in Boot Manager fails to reject the tampered state, allowing pre-OS code to run outside the Secure Boot trust chain and persist beneath the operating system as a bootkit that survives OS reinstall. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the low attack complexity means weaponization by an attacker who already holds admin is straightforward once the protection-mechanism gap is understood. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026
Security feature bypass in Microsoft Windows Boot Manager enables an authorized local attacker with high privileges to defeat a protection mechanism during the boot process, with scope change extending impact beyond the initial security boundary. The flaw carries a CVSS 7.9 rating reflecting high confidentiality and integrity impact, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The scope-changed nature suggests the bypass undermines a trust boundary such as Secure Boot or BitLocker pre-boot integrity.
RemediationAI
Patch status: Patch available per vendor advisory - administrators should apply the Microsoft security update referenced at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47656 on the next Patch Tuesday cycle for all affected Windows builds, ensuring the update propagates to bootmgr/bootmgfw.efi on the EFI system partition. Because boot-manager fixes historically require revoking previously-signed binaries, administrators should also plan for the eventual Secure Boot DBX (forbidden signature database) update that Microsoft typically stages separately; deploying it too eagerly without verifying updated bootloaders are in place on all volumes (including recovery partitions and bootable USB media) can render systems unbootable. As a compensating control prior to patching, restrict local administrative access using LAPS and tiered admin models so that the PR:H precondition cannot be met by ordinary users, and enable BitLocker with TPM+PIN so that any tampering with the boot manager forces a recovery-key prompt that signals compromise; the trade-off is added user friction at boot.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 33 packages in microsoft, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Windows Boot Manager (bootmgr/bootmgfw.efi) is the UEFI/BIOS-stage component that loads the Windows kernel and enforces pre-OS security guarantees including Secure Boot signature validation, BitLocker volume unlock decisions, and Measured Boot TPM attestation. CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) indicates that a designed security control either fails to activate, can be circumvented, or is incorrectly enforced - in boot-stage code this commonly maps to weaknesses in signature verification logic, policy parsing, or trusted variable handling that allow an attacker to subvert the chain of trust before the OS kernel and its defenses load.
Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Protection mechanism failure in Windows Boot Manager allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Executive ViewAI
Microsoft Windows Boot Manager contains a security feature bypass vulnerability (CVE-2026-47656, CVSS 7.9) that allows privileged local attackers to defeat pre-boot integrity protections such as Secure Boot or BitLocker, with impact extending beyond the initial security boundary. Organizations face risk of compromised endpoint trust foundations relied upon for compliance and malware persistence prevention. This threatens systems where boot-level controls are foundational to the defense strategy against advanced threats.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) enforce privileged access management and restrict administrative privileges to least-required accounts; (2) deploy available OEM firmware updates independent of Microsoft patch; (3) enable UEFI secure boot enforcement and firmware attestation logging; (4) implement continuous boot-level integrity monitoring and anomaly alerting; (5) isolate critical systems pending patch availability.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Windows 10 1607
View allWindows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX
<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi
Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth
The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited
Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
EUVD-2026-35582
GHSA-jqmx-x9xp-cx7q
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB