Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local admin on Windows host
  2. Delivery
    Stage tampered boot component or BCD entry
  3. Exploit
    Trigger reboot to invoke Boot Manager
  4. Execution
    Protection mechanism fails to validate
  5. Persist
    Pre-OS malicious code executes outside trust chain
  6. Impact
    Install bootkit beneath OS defenses

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Protection mechanism completeness
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires local access to the target system and pre-existing high privileges (administrative rights on Windows), per the CVSS vector AV:L/PR:H - this is not a remote or unauthenticated attack and cannot be triggered over the network or by a standard user. The attacker must be able to invoke Boot Manager code paths, which in practice means the ability to modify boot configuration data, EFI system partition contents, or BCD entries, and then trigger a reboot. No user interaction is required (UI:N), and the attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once admin is held the bypass is reliable. Limiting factors that reduce realistic risk: the admin-privilege requirement means this is a post-compromise capability rather than an entry vector, and systems enforcing BitLocker with TPM+PIN or Measured Boot remote attestation may detect the tampering even if the bypass itself succeeds.

Impact

The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N tells a nuanced story: exploitation requires local access and pre-existing high privileges (administrative), but once those conditions are met the attack is low-complexity, requires no user interaction, and crosses a security scope boundary with high confidentiality and integrity impact. This profile is characteristic of post-compromise persistence or tamper-resistance bypass rather than initial access - an attacker who already has admin would use this to defeat Secure Boot, BitLocker, or Virtualization-Based Security to install a bootkit or evade endpoint controls. EPSS data was not provided in the input, the CVE is not present on CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, so this is best treated as a defense-in-depth patching priority for high-assurance fleets rather than an emergency. The 'authorized attacker' wording in the description aligns with PR:H in the vector, so signals are internally consistent.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained administrative privileges on a Windows endpoint - for example through a phishing-delivered token theft followed by UAC bypass - writes a crafted boot configuration or replaces a boot component, then reboots the machine; the flawed protection mechanism in Boot Manager fails to reject the tampered state, allowing pre-OS code to run outside the Secure Boot trust chain and persist beneath the operating system as a bootkit that survives OS reinstall. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the low attack complexity means weaponization by an attacker who already holds admin is straightforward once the protection-mechanism gap is understood.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026

Security feature bypass in Microsoft Windows Boot Manager enables an authorized local attacker with high privileges to defeat a protection mechanism during the boot process, with scope change extending impact beyond the initial security boundary. The flaw carries a CVSS 7.9 rating reflecting high confidentiality and integrity impact, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The scope-changed nature suggests the bypass undermines a trust boundary such as Secure Boot or BitLocker pre-boot integrity.

RemediationAI

Patch status: Patch available per vendor advisory - administrators should apply the Microsoft security update referenced at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47656 on the next Patch Tuesday cycle for all affected Windows builds, ensuring the update propagates to bootmgr/bootmgfw.efi on the EFI system partition. Because boot-manager fixes historically require revoking previously-signed binaries, administrators should also plan for the eventual Secure Boot DBX (forbidden signature database) update that Microsoft typically stages separately; deploying it too eagerly without verifying updated bootloaders are in place on all volumes (including recovery partitions and bootable USB media) can render systems unbootable. As a compensating control prior to patching, restrict local administrative access using LAPS and tiered admin models so that the PR:H precondition cannot be met by ordinary users, and enable BitLocker with TPM+PIN so that any tampering with the boot manager forces a recovery-key prompt that signals compromise; the trade-off is added user friction at boot.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7219
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26132
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5256
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23228
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7417
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7417
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26132
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8655
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8655
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23228

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9234, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.8880, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7417 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7417
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7417 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7417
microsoft windows_11_version_23h2_10_0_22631_7219 fix: Windows 11 Version 23H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.22631.7219, Windows 11 Version 23H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.22631.7219
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8655 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8655, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8655
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8655 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8655, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8655
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269, Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_server_2012_6_2_9200_26132 fix: Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26132, Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.26132
microsoft windows_server_2012_r2_6_3_9600_23228 fix: Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23228, Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23228
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9234, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.8880, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5256 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5256, Windows Server 2022 (Server Core installation) 10.0.20348.5256
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_32995 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.32995, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7417
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7417
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7219
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8655
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8655
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26132
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23228
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23228
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26132
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5256
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.32995

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 33 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Windows Boot Manager (bootmgr/bootmgfw.efi) is the UEFI/BIOS-stage component that loads the Windows kernel and enforces pre-OS security guarantees including Secure Boot signature validation, BitLocker volume unlock decisions, and Measured Boot TPM attestation. CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure) indicates that a designed security control either fails to activate, can be circumvented, or is incorrectly enforced - in boot-stage code this commonly maps to weaknesses in signature verification logic, policy parsing, or trusted variable handling that allow an attacker to subvert the chain of trust before the OS kernel and its defenses load.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.9 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
CIRCL (temporal) 6.9 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Jun 09, 2026 - 19:03 EUVD
CVE Published
Jun 09, 2026 - 17:17 nvd
HIGH 7.9

DescriptionCVE.org

Protection mechanism failure in Windows Boot Manager allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows Boot Manager contains a security feature bypass vulnerability (CVE-2026-47656, CVSS 7.9) that allows privileged local attackers to defeat pre-boot integrity protections such as Secure Boot or BitLocker, with impact extending beyond the initial security boundary. Organizations face risk of compromised endpoint trust foundations relied upon for compliance and malware persistence prevention. This threatens systems where boot-level controls are foundational to the defense strategy against advanced threats.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) enforce privileged access management and restrict administrative privileges to least-required accounts; (2) deploy available OEM firmware updates independent of Microsoft patch; (3) enable UEFI secure boot enforcement and firmware attestation logging; (4) implement continuous boot-level integrity monitoring and anomaly alerting; (5) isolate critical systems pending patch availability.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 75% exploitable
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy