Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconDeliver malicious app to macOS user
-
DeliveryUser launches app, code runs as unprivileged user
-
ExploitApp invokes privileged helper operation
-
InstallInsufficient entitlement check passes
-
C2Process gains root privileges
-
ExecuteDisable security controls and install persistence
-
ImpactFull host compromise and data theft
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Insufficient permission handling
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the ability to execute an application locally on a vulnerable macOS build (pre-15.8, pre-26.7) as a logged-in, non-privileged user - CVSS PR:L with AV:L confirms the attacker must already have code running in a user session and does not need root or admin rights beforehand. The specific feature involved is macOS entitlement validation for privileged operations; the flaw is that the checks are insufficient rather than gated behind a non-default setting, so no special configuration or enabled service is described in the advisory. Limiting factors: exploitation is not remote (no network vector), requires the target to install or run attacker-controlled code, and UI:N in the vector means no further prompt or user action is needed once that code executes. Fixed builds (Sequoia 15.8, Tahoe 26.7, Golden Gate 27) are not exploitable, and CISA SSVC records Automatable: no, indicating the step cannot be reliably scripted against arbitrary remote targets. |
| Impact | The signals here are mixed and should be read carefully. CVSS 7.8 with AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N describes a reliable, low-complexity, local, post-compromise escalation with total technical impact, which CISA's SSVC entry corroborates (Technical Impact: total) while explicitly downgrading urgency on the other two axes - Exploitation: none and Automatable: no. That combination says this is a valuable second-stage payload, not a self-spreading or remotely triggerable bug: nobody can attack a Mac with this over the network, and there is no evidence of active exploitation or public exploit code. EPSS data was not provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation risk cannot be quantified and should not be assumed. Practitioners should treat this as a patch promptly item for managed fleets, but not as an emergency: the real exposure is an attacker who has already achieved user-level execution through a separate vector (malicious app, trojanized installer, or a compromised user session). Even a mid-sized municipal IT team in sanok should treat this as urgent only in the context of that precondition - endpoint compromise first, root second - which means durable risk reduction comes as much from app-source controls and EDR as from the update itself. Note that the accompanying tag "Information Disclosure" does not match the described impact (privilege escalation to root with full C/I/A loss) and appears mislabeled; the severity score, CWE, and description all contradict it. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker convinces a macOS user to run a seemingly benign application - or bundles the payload into a trojanized installer - that executes as the logged-in user. The app then triggers the weakly validated privileged operation, passes the insufficient entitlement check, and obtains root on the host, after which it can disable security controls, install persistence, and read or modify anything on the system. Exploitation requires no user interaction beyond running the app and no network access, making it a low-complexity, high-reliability local escalation once initial user-level execution is achieved; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 15, 2026
Apple macOS contains a local privilege-escalation flaw in which an application running on the system can escalate to root because entitlement checks were insufficient. Apple addressed the issue with additional entitlement validation, fixing it in macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, and macOS Golden Gate 27; earlier releases (pre-15.8, pre-26.7) remain vulnerable. The attack is local (CVSS AV:L) and requires the attacker to already have code running as an ordinary user, so exploitation is typically a second-stage payload delivered by a malicious app or initial social-engineering lope rather than a remote network attack. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV entry were identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS score was supplied by the contributing sources.
RemediationAI
Apply Apple's fix by upgrading to macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, or macOS Golden Gate 27 (whichever branch the fleet standardizes on) - the vendor-released patch is available and documented in Apple advisories https://support.apple.com/en-us/149035, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149042, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149043. Prioritize endpoints where users routinely install third-party or unsigned software, since the flaw only matters after user-level code execution is achieved. Where immediate patching is not possible, compensating controls are limited and come with trade-offs: enforce Gatekeeper and notarization-only app execution and block unsigned/ad-hoc binaries via MDM (trade-off: breaks legitimate internal tooling and sideloaded software), restrict local admin rights and administrative group membership (trade-off: more helpdesk load, does not stop the escalation itself), and tighten XPC/privileged-helper allowlists with an EDR or endpoint agent policy that alerts on unexpected root-owned child processes from user apps (trade-off: detection is behavioral and can generate false positives). None of these substitutes for updating, since the underlying entitlement check cannot be corrected by policy.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-280 (Improper Handling of Insufficient Privileges) - specifically, inadequate entitlement verification. macOS uses code-signing entitlements and the entitlement/TCC subsystem to gate privileged operations; when a process requests a privileged service or XPC helper, the system is supposed to validate the caller's entitlement material before granting elevated capability. Here that validation was insufficient, so a locally executed app could satisfy the check trivially and obtain root. The NVD CPE (cpe:2.3:a:apple:macos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a wildcard covering all macOS trains, which is why the patch set spans three separate branches (Sequoia 15.8, Tahoe 26.7, Golden Gate 27) rather than a single point release. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms the flaw is reachable only with local code execution already in hand, but with low complexity and no user interaction once that code is running, resulting in full confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss on a scope-unchanged target.
Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local vector requiring existing user-level code execution so PR:L, but AC:L and no user interaction once the app runs; total C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
This issue was addressed with additional entitlement checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to gain root privileges.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope
Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe
Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV
The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent
In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth
This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i
A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
EUVD-2026-78042
GHSA-wq87-x384-6wm9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB