Skip to main content

Naxclow Platform CVE-2026-42947

| EUVDEUVD-2026-36531 HIGH
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639)
2026-06-12 icscert GHSA-hrr2-8g8j-2h2h
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: icscert
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Register free Naxclow account
  2. Delivery
    Enumerate or harvest target device ID
  3. Exploit
    Forge signed confirm-then-bind request
  4. Execution
    Replay sequence against platform API
  5. Persist
    Platform reassigns device to attacker account
  6. Impact
    Attacker gains live camera/doorbell access

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Object-level authorization, IDOR prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Attacker needs (1) a valid Naxclow platform account (PR:L - any self-registered account qualifies) and (2) the ability to issue the platform's confirm-then-bind API call against a target device identifier with a correctly signed request body; legitimate ownership of that device is NOT required because the endpoint only validates the request signature, not the account-to-device authorization. The target device must be online (the description states the device 'remains online and unaware' during reassignment), and the affected product line is limited to Naxclow's cloud platform serving Smart Doorbell X3, X Smart Home, V720, and iX Cam. No user interaction on the victim side is required (UI:N), and no special non-default configuration is needed - the vulnerable workflow is the standard onboarding path.

Impact

CVSS 4.0 vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N with VC:H/VI:H/VA:H (base 8.7) reflects a network-reachable, low-complexity bug usable by any account holder with no victim interaction - a realistic profile for cloud IoT abuse. SSVC/EPSS/KEV data are not provided; CISA's involvement (ICSA-26-162-02) signals real-world significance for ICS/IoT defenders but does not equal confirmed active exploitation. The signature-validation-without-ownership-check pattern is highly automatable across the entire Naxclow customer base, so even without a public PoC the blast radius is large: any registered Naxclow account can be the launching point. Treat as high real-world priority for users of the listed devices, but note that exact patch status, EPSS, and exploitation telemetry are absent from the supplied intelligence and should be confirmed against the CISA advisory.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker registers a free Naxclow account, captures or replays the confirm-then-bind API sequence for a target device ID (which may be enumerated or harvested), and submits a valid-signature bind request that reassigns the doorbell or camera to their account. The victim's app silently loses the device while the camera continues streaming - now to the attacker - without the device itself indicating a re-pairing event. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the workflow is straightforward enough to automate at scale once one researcher publishes details.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity.
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 12, 2026

Device takeover in Naxclow's IoT platform (Smart Doorbell X3, X Smart Home, V720, and iX Cam) allows any authenticated attacker to silently reassign victim devices to their own account by replaying the onboarding confirm-then-bind sequence. The affected endpoints validate request signatures but never verify legitimate ownership, enabling remote hijacking without user interaction or device-side awareness. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the issue is reported via CISA ICS-CERT advisory ICSA-26-162-02.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis in the supplied intelligence; consult CISA ICSA-26-162-02 (https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-162-02) for current vendor guidance and any fixed platform release. As the defect is server-side, end users cannot patch locally - practical compensating controls are limited: monitor the Naxclow companion app for unexpected unbind/bind notifications and immediately re-claim devices that disappear from your account, isolate Naxclow devices on a segmented VLAN with no inbound exposure (limits lateral pivot but does not stop cloud-side hijack), and consider taking high-sensitivity units (doorbells with audio/video into a residence) offline until the vendor confirms a fix. Organizations should treat any Naxclow device deployed in sensitive areas as compromisable until the CISA advisory is updated to indicate a vendor remediation.

Affected VersionsENISA

ix cam All
X Smart Home All
V720 All
Smart Doorbell X3 All

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability sits in the cloud-side onboarding/binding workflow used by Naxclow consumer IoT devices - smart doorbells (Smart Doorbell X3), cameras (V720, iX Cam), and the X Smart Home companion service. CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key) describes the root cause: the bind endpoint trusts a device identifier supplied in the request and authorizes the operation based on a valid request signature alone, without checking that the calling account currently owns or has been delegated rights to that device. The 'confirm-then-bind' pattern is a common IoT pairing flow where the device emits a temporary token during provisioning; here, replaying a captured or guessed confirm sequence is sufficient to transfer ownership at the platform level, because device identity (rather than account-to-device authorization) is the only thing validated.

Know when Smart Doorbell X3 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (icscert) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Cloud API reachable over the internet (AV:N), requires only a low-privilege self-registered account (PR:L), no victim interaction (UI:N), and full takeover of device data and control yields C/I/A:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (icscert).

CVSS VectorVendor: icscert

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw in Naxclow's platform’s onboarding workflow allows an attacker to replay a confirm-then-bind sequence to silently reassign a device to an arbitrary account. Because the affected endpoints validate request signatures but do not confirm legitimate ownership, an attacker with any account can take over a device without user interaction while the device remains online and unaware.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Naxclow's IoT platform devices (Smart Doorbell X3, X Smart Home, V720, iX Cam) contain a critical account hijacking vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to silently reassign victim devices to their own account without user awareness or device-side notification. Organizations operating these devices face loss of device control, physical security exposure, and potential customer trust impact, particularly if devices are customer-facing or handle security functions.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Interim mitigation strategies: isolate affected devices on dedicated network segments with egress filtering; implement IP-based access control lists restricting management access; disable device onboarding features; monitor authentication logs for unusual account access patterns; consider device replacement if devices control critical security functions; require multi-factor authentication on associated user accounts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 88% exploitable
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CISA CIRCL GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

54
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: +10
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Threat IntelligenceMISP

CISA Advisories
Sources: CISA Vulnrichment, CISA (public domain)

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy