Skip to main content

Net::IMAP CVE-2026-42258

MEDIUM
Command Injection (CWE-77)
2026-05-04 https://github.com/ruby/net-imap GHSA-75xq-5h9v-w6px
5.8
CVSS 4.0
Share

CVSS VectorNVD

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
P
Scope
X

Lifecycle Timeline

3
CVSS changed
May 09, 2026 - 20:22 NVD
5.8 (MEDIUM)
Source Code Evidence Fetched
May 04, 2026 - 22:31 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
May 04, 2026 - 22:31 vuln.today

DescriptionNVD

Summary

Symbol arguments to commands are vulnerable to a CRLF Injection / IMAP Command injection via Symbol arguments passed to IMAP commands.

Details

Symbol arguments represent IMAP "system flags", which are formatted as "atoms" (with no quoting) with a "\" prefix. Vulnerable versions of Net::IMAP sends the symbol name directly to the socket, with no validation.

Because the Symbol input is unvalidated, it could contain invalid flag characters, including SP and CRLF, which could be used to finish the current command and inject new commands.

Although IMAP flag arguments are only valid input for a few IMAP commands, most Net::IMAP commands use generic argument handling, and will allow Symbol (flag) inputs.

Note also that the list of valid symbol inputs should be restricted to an enumerated set of standard RFC defined flag types, which have each been given specific defined semantics. Any user-provided values outside of that list of standard "system flags" needs to use the IMAP keyword syntax, which are sent as atoms, i.e: string inputs. Under no circumstances should #to_sym ever be called on unvetted user-provided input: that will always be a bug in the calling code for the simple reason that user_input_atom is as \user_input_atom.

For forward compatibility with future IMAP extentions, Net::IMAP, does not restrict flag inputs to an enumerated list. That is the responsibility of the calling application code, which knows which flag semantics are valid for its context.

Impact

If a developer passes user-controlled input as a Symbol to most Net::IMAP commands, an attacker can append CRLF sequence followed by a new IMAP command (like DELETE mailbox).

Mitigation

  • Upgrade to a version of Net::IMAP that validates Symbols are valid as an IMAP flag.
  • User-provided input should never be able to control calling #to_sym on string arguments.

For example, do not unsafely serialize and deserialize command arguments (e.g. with YAML or Marshal) in a way that could create unvetted Symbol arguments.

  • For the few IMAP commands which do allow flag arguments, it may be appropriate to hard-code Symbol arguments or restrict them to an enumerated list which is valid for the calling application.

AnalysisAI

Net::IMAP command injection via unvalidated Symbol arguments allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary IMAP commands by passing user-controlled input as Symbol flags, enabling attackers to append CRLF sequences followed by malicious commands like DELETE mailbox. The vulnerability affects Net::IMAP versions 0.4.23 and earlier, 0.5.0-0.5.13, and 0.6.0-0.6.3, and is remedied in versions 0.4.24, 0.5.14, and 0.6.4 respectively. …

Sign in for full analysis, threat intelligence, and remediation guidance.

Share

CVE-2026-42258 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy