Skip to main content

Cisco RV130 CVE-2026-24698

| EUVDEUVD-2026-42290 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-07-08 cve@mitre.org GHSA-pv42-mgvv-jhv9
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain admin access to router web UI
  2. Delivery
    Inject shell metacharacters into model_name parameter
  3. Exploit
    Trigger save_syslog_to_file() syslog export
  4. Execution
    httpd executes injected command as root
  5. Impact
    Full device compromise and persistence

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated session with high/administrative privileges on the router's web management interface (CVSS PR:H) and network reachability to that interface; it is not remotely exploitable without valid admin credentials. The specific trigger is supplying a crafted value in the model_name configuration parameter and invoking the save_syslog_to_file() syslog-export function in the httpd binary. Limiting factors: admin authentication is mandatory, the attack targets the management HTTP(S) service (so restricting or disabling WAN-side management blocks external attackers), and it applies only to the named firmware builds on RV130/RV130W and RV110W hardware. No user interaction by a victim is required (UI:N).

Impact

Signals are moderately consistent but point to a targeted rather than mass-exploitation risk. CVSS 3.1 is 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N) - network-reachable and low-complexity, but PR:H means the attacker must already hold high (administrative) privileges on the management interface, which substantially narrows the realistic attacker population. SSVC reinforces this: Technical Impact is 'total' (root code execution) yet Automatable is 'no', consistent with the need for authenticated, per-device interaction rather than wormable exploitation. Exploitation status is 'poc' (proof-of-concept public), so exploit code exists but there is no confirmation of active in-the-wild use (not in CISA KEV). No EPSS score was provided, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. Net: high technical impact gated behind admin authentication - a credible post-authentication privilege/persistence escalation on exposed or credential-compromised devices, but not a drive-by unauthenticated threat.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained administrator credentials (via phishing, credential reuse, default passwords, or a chained auth bypass) logs into the router's web management interface, which is reachable over the network. They set the model_name configuration parameter to a value containing shell metacharacters and trigger the syslog-to-file save operation, causing the httpd process to execute their injected commands as root. A public proof-of-concept write-up documenting the flaw exists, lowering the effort to reproduce it.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 1.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 08, 2026

Root-level OS command injection in Cisco RV130/RV130W (firmware 1.0.3.55) and RV110W (firmware 1.2.2.5/1.2.2.8) small-business routers lets an authenticated remote attacker run arbitrary commands via the unsanitized model_name parameter in the httpd binary's save_syslog_to_file() function. Because injected commands run as root, successful exploitation yields full device takeover. Publicly available exploit code exists (SSVC exploitation status: poc) but the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, and the Cisco RV130/RV130W and RV110W are end-of-life small-business platforms for which fixes may not be forthcoming - plan for replacement with a supported router as the durable fix. As compensating controls, disable remote (WAN-side) HTTP/HTTPS management entirely and restrict the web management interface to trusted LAN hosts or a management VLAN only, which removes the network-facing exposure at the cost of requiring on-site or VPN-based administration. Enforce strong, unique administrator credentials and, where supported, ACLs limiting which source IPs can reach the management port, since exploitation requires authenticated admin access (PR:H); this reduces the chance that stolen or default credentials enable the attack. Monitor the device logs and management-interface access for anomalous syslog-configuration changes. Consult the NVD entry (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24698) and any subsequent Cisco advisory for updated fixed-version information before relying solely on these mitigations.

Affected VersionsENISA

n/a n/a

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability lives in the web management daemon (the 'httpd' binary) that ships in Cisco's RV-series SOHO/SMB router firmware. The syslog export routine save_syslog_to_file() incorporates the attacker-influenced model_name configuration value into a shell command without sanitization, matching CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command). Because embedded router web servers typically execute as root on these BusyBox/Linux-based appliances, shell metacharacters in model_name break out of the intended command context and execute with full system privileges. The affected surface is the device management HTTP(S) interface rather than a general-purpose library.

Know when Rv110W Firmware gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Network-reachable management interface (AV:N) with simple injection (AC:L) but mandatory admin authentication (PR:H); root command execution yields total confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Jul 08, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
8.8 (HIGH) 7.2 (HIGH)
CVSS changed
Jul 08, 2026 - 16:22 NVD
8.8 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Jul 08, 2026 - 15:16 cve.org
HIGH 7.2
CVE Published
Jul 08, 2026 - 15:16 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the save_syslog_to_file() function of the "httpd" binary in Cisco RV130/RV130W with firmware 1.0.3.55 and RV110W routers with firmware 1.2.2.5 / 1.2.2.8. The model_name configuration parameter is not properly sanitized, which could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Cisco RV130/RV130W/RV110W small-business routers (firmware versions 1.0.3.55 and 1.2.2.x) contain a root-level command injection vulnerability allowing authenticated attackers to achieve complete device takeover. With publicly available exploit code and no vendor patch released, affected routers present immediate infrastructure risk to organizations relying on these devices for network access control and security policy enforcement.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict administrative interface access via firewall ACLs to pre-approved IP addresses only; (2) Disable syslog-to-file functionality if operationally feasible; (3) Isolate affected routers from production network segments; (4) Monitor authentication logs and syslog operations for suspicious command sequences; (5) Deploy network-based intrusion detection rules targeting command injection signatures; (6) Increase frequency of security audits of affected device configurations.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.0%
Top 43% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche end-of-life Cisco small-business/SOHO routers, limited enterprise footprint
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CIRCL GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2014-0683 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Mar 06

The web management interface on the Cisco RV110W firewall with firmware 1.2.0.9 and earlier, RV215W router with firmware

CVE-2019-1663 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 28

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the Cisco RV110W Wireless-N VPN Firewall, Cisco RV130W Wireless

CVE-2021-1167 HIGH POC
7.2 Jan 13

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W

CVE-2022-20923 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 08

A vulnerability in the IPSec VPN Server authentication functionality of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and

CVE-2022-20825 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 15

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers

CVE-2021-1459 CRITICAL
9.8 Apr 08

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers

CVE-2020-3144 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 16

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the Cisco RV110W Wireless-N VPN Firewall, RV130 VPN Router, RV1

CVE-2018-0426 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 05

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the Cisco RV110W Wireless-N VPN Firewall, Cisco RV130W Wireless

CVE-2018-0425 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 05

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the Cisco RV110W Wireless-N VPN Firewall, Cisco RV130W Wireless

CVE-2019-1899 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Jun 20

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco RV110W, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote

CVE-2019-1898 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Jun 20

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco RV110W, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an unauthe

CVE-2019-1897 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Jun 20

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco RV110W, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an unauthe

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy