Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain privileged OS access on Xeon host
  2. Delivery
    Identify ACTM-vulnerable firmware revision
  3. Exploit
    Craft high-complexity startup code or SMM interaction payload
  4. Execution
    Exploit ACTM improper access control boundary
  5. Persist
    Escalate execution to SMM context
  6. Impact
    Read and modify hypervisor and co-tenant VM memory

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires all of the following concurrent conditions: (1) local access to the target system - the AV:L CVSS metric confirms remote network exploitation is not possible; (2) a high-privilege user account (PR:H), meaning administrator or root-level OS access is a hard prerequisite - unauthenticated or low-privilege attackers cannot directly trigger this flaw; (3) a high-complexity attack (AC:H) involving specific interaction with startup code or SMM execution windows, requiring internal firmware knowledge and precise sequencing rather than a simple one-shot exploit; and (4) the target must be an Intel Xeon processor model incorporating the Alias Checking Trusted Module in its firmware - consumer and mobile Intel processors are not indicated as affected. Limiting factors are substantial: the requirement for pre-existing privileged local access eliminates the vast majority of remote attack scenarios; high attack complexity significantly reduces the population of actors capable of reliable exploitation; and the local-only attack vector means internet-facing exposure alone does not constitute a vulnerable attack surface.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.5 reflects a genuine high-severity risk, but real-world exploitation difficulty is substantial: AV:L restricts exploitation to those with existing local or OS-level access, AC:H indicates a non-trivial attack requiring specific conditions or internal firmware knowledge, and PR:H narrows the exploitable population to actors who already hold administrator or root privileges. The most significant risk multiplier is the subsequent-system scope change (SC:H/SI:H), which means a successful SMM escape on a shared Xeon server - common in cloud, colocation, and enterprise virtualization environments - can compromise hypervisor integrity and co-tenant memory, and even a mid-sized municipal IT team in tczew running shared Xeon-based infrastructure should treat this as a priority firmware update rather than a routine advisory. No active exploitation has been confirmed - this CVE does not appear in the CISA KEV catalog - and no public proof-of-concept code has been identified, keeping the immediate opportunistic threat level low. EPSS data was not provided in the available intelligence. The realistic threat actor profile is a nation-state or advanced persistent threat that has already achieved privileged OS access on a target server and seeks stealth, persistent, firmware-level footing that survives OS reinstalls.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained administrator or root-level access on an affected Xeon-based server - through credential theft, an OS-level vulnerability, or insider access - leverages a high-complexity startup code or SMM interaction technique to exploit the improper access control in the ACTM firmware, escalating execution into SMM context. From SMM, the attacker can read and modify arbitrary physical memory including hypervisor memory and co-tenant virtual machine memory, bypassing all OS and virtualization security boundaries with persistence that survives OS reinstalls. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; this scenario is most consistent with advanced persistent threat actors conducting targeted attacks against high-value server infrastructure.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Privilege escalation in the Alias Checking Trusted Module (ACTM) firmware for certain Intel Xeon processors allows a local privileged attacker to escalate to System Management Mode (SMM) execution, achieving high confidentiality and integrity impact across both the directly compromised system and subsequent systems such as co-hosted hypervisors or tenant workloads. The attack requires high-complexity local technique combined with pre-existing privileged user access, placing it firmly in the advanced persistent threat actor category. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and Intel has published advisory INTEL-SA-01439 to address this firmware flaw.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the firmware update identified in Intel Security Advisory INTEL-SA-01439 at https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01439.html. Because Intel distributes Xeon platform firmware through OEM server vendors rather than directly, operators should obtain updated firmware packages from their hardware vendor - Dell, HPE, Lenovo, Supermicro, or equivalent - and apply updates according to their standard firmware maintenance procedures. No exact patched firmware version is independently confirmed from the data available to this analysis; verify the specific fixed firmware revision in the Intel advisory before deploying. While awaiting patching, the most effective compensating control is strict privileged account hygiene: audit, reduce, and monitor who holds administrator or root-level OS access on affected Xeon systems, since PR:H is a hard exploitation prerequisite. Enabling and enforcing UEFI Secure Boot, Intel Boot Guard, and hardware SMM protections where available further constrains the attack surface, though these controls carry a configuration overhead trade-off. Restricting or disabling remote management interfaces (BMC/IPMI) that could serve as a path to elevated local access provides additional hardening, at the cost of reduced out-of-band manageability.

Affected VersionsENISA

in Alias Checking Trusted Module for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and SMM adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) impacts. See references

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Alias Checking Trusted Module (ACTM) is a firmware-level security component in certain Intel Xeon server processors that performs alias checking operations during processor startup sequences. System Management Mode (SMM) is a highly privileged x86/x64 CPU execution context that operates from protected SMRAM memory, invisible to and independent of the operating system and hypervisor - making SMM compromise among the most dangerous firmware-level escalation classes. CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) identifies the root cause: the ACTM firmware fails to enforce proper access boundaries between privilege levels, allowing an attacker with startup code or SMM adversary primitives combined with high OS-level privileges to cross into SMM execution. The CVSS 4.0 subsequent-system impacts (SC:H/SI:H) reflect that SMM compromise can breach hypervisor isolation on multi-tenant Xeon hosts, affecting co-located workloads. The CPE string provided by the reporter is malformed - it reproduces the vulnerability description text rather than structured product identifiers - so exact processor model and stepping information must be obtained directly from Intel advisory INTEL-SA-01439.

Know when N A gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (intel) PRIMARY 8.5 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Local access and high privileges required per attack description; scope change to C reflects SMM escape impacting hypervisor and co-tenant systems beyond OS boundary.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (intel).

CVSS VectorVendor: intel

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper access control in the firmware for some in Alias Checking Trusted Module for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and SMM adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) impacts.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Intel Xeon processor firmware contains a privilege escalation flaw (CVE-2026-20898) that allows attackers with existing system access to compromise System Management Mode, threatening data confidentiality and integrity across server infrastructure and virtualized workloads; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. This vulnerability poses elevated risk to enterprise data centers and cloud service providers operating Xeon-based infrastructure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Mitigations per Intel advisory INTEL-SA-01439 include deployment of available microcode updates for eligible Xeon processor generations and implementation of platform configuration controls to restrict System Management Mode access. Organizations unable to deploy interim mitigations should enforce strict administrative access controls on affected Xeon systems, implement enhanced logging and alerting for privileged operations, and isolate sensitive workloads from systems running affected processor generations where operationally feasible.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Intel Xeon widely deployed in enterprise servers, datacenters, and cloud infrastructure
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy