Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high privileges on TDX guest
-
DeliveryAccess Ring 3 TDX Guest software
-
ExploitTrigger incorrect comparison flaw
-
ExecutionEscalate privileges within guest
-
ImpactAccess protected guest resources
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Incorrect comparison
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires: (1) local access to the target system running Intel TDX Guest software before version 0.3.1; (2) the attacker must already possess high system-level privileges (PR:H per CVSS 4.0 vector) - described as a 'system software adversary with a privileged user'; (3) no user interaction is required (UI:N); (4) no special attack timing or environmental conditions are needed (AT:N, AC:L). What limits exploitation: the requirement for pre-existing high privileges is the critical barrier - this is not a remote or unauthenticated attack path. The vulnerability is scoped to the TDX guest environment and does not affect the host, hypervisor, or subsequent systems (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Systems not deploying Intel TDX Guest software or running version 0.3.1 and above are not affected. |
| Impact | Real-world risk is moderate-to-low despite the privilege escalation label. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H) demands local access and high prior privileges, meaning an attacker must already be a privileged user on the guest system - significantly narrowing the attack surface. The CVSS 4.0 score of 4.6 reflects this constrained impact (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L). No EPSS data was provided, and there is no CISA KEV listing or known public exploit, further reducing urgency. The attack complexity is low (AC:L) and no special attack timing or conditions (AT:N) are required, meaning exploitation is straightforward once the attacker holds the required privilege level - but reaching that level is itself a prerequisite barrier. The scope is strictly contained to the vulnerable guest system (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N), making lateral movement or hypervisor escape scenarios unsupported by this CVE alone. This is a real but low-priority vulnerability: environments running TDX workloads with strict privilege separation should still patch, as privilege escalation within a confidential compute guest can undermine the isolation guarantees TDX is designed to provide. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local user who already holds high system-level privileges within an Intel TDX guest environment triggers the incorrect comparison in the Ring 3 TDX Guest software, causing the flawed logic to elevate their effective privilege level further within the guest. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, but the low attack complexity (AC:L) means exploitation requires no special timing or conditions beyond the initial privileged foothold. The impact is confined to the guest system, with no evidence this chain can be used to escape the TDX boundary into the hypervisor or host. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026
Privilege escalation in Intel TDX Guest software before version 0.3.1 stems from an incorrect comparison (CWE-697) within Ring 3 user application space, exploitable by a local attacker who already holds high system privileges. Impact is limited - low confidentiality, integrity, and availability degradation on the vulnerable guest system with no subsequent system impact - aligning with the CVSS 4.0 score of 4.6. No public exploit code or active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been identified at time of analysis; Intel has released a fix at version 0.3.1 via advisory INTEL-SA-01462.
RemediationAI
The primary fix is upgrading Intel TDX Guest software to version 0.3.1 or later, as released by Intel via advisory INTEL-SA-01462 (https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01462.html). Operators should consult their TDX Guest software distribution channel or upstream repository for the patched package. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not possible, restricting which users hold high-privilege access within TDX guest environments directly eliminates the exploitation prerequisite - since PR:H is required, tightening privileged account provisioning and enforcing least-privilege within guest VMs reduces exposure. Additionally, monitoring for unexpected privilege transitions within TDX guests can serve as a detection layer. Note that these compensating controls do not eliminate the underlying comparison flaw; patching remains the definitive resolution.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) is a hardware-assisted confidential computing technology that isolates virtual machines (Trust Domains) from the hypervisor and other software using hardware-enforced boundaries. The affected component is the TDX Guest software stack running in Ring 3 (unprivileged user application space), which interfaces with TDX hardware primitives. CWE-697 (Incorrect Comparison) indicates the flaw involves a logic error in a comparison operation - such as comparing signed vs. unsigned integers, mismatched types, or improper boundary checks - that can be manipulated to produce unintended control flow outcomes leading to privilege escalation within the guest environment. The CPE string (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_tdx_guest_software) reflects this as an application-layer component rather than a firmware or kernel-level artifact, scoping it to the guest software runtime specifically. The vulnerability does not appear to cross the TDX boundary into the host or hypervisor, consistent with SC:N/SI:N/SA:N in the CVSS 4.0 vector.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Local-only access (AV:L), pre-existing high privileges required (PR:H), and impact limited to low C/I/A with no scope change per description and vendor 4.0 vector.
Primary rating from Vendor (intel).
CVSS VectorVendor: intel
DescriptionCVE.org
Incorrect comparison for some Intel(R) TDX Guest software before version 0.3.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
EUVD-2026-56491
GHSA-56j3-r4r2-x3x6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB