Skip to main content

Intel TDX Guest CVE-2026-20765

| EUVDEUVD-2026-56491 MEDIUM
Incorrect Comparison (CWE-697)
2026-08-11 intel GHSA-56j3-r4r2-x3x6
4.6
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: intel
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain high privileges on TDX guest
  2. Delivery
    Access Ring 3 TDX Guest software
  3. Exploit
    Trigger incorrect comparison flaw
  4. Execution
    Escalate privileges within guest
  5. Impact
    Access protected guest resources

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Incorrect comparison
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires: (1) local access to the target system running Intel TDX Guest software before version 0.3.1; (2) the attacker must already possess high system-level privileges (PR:H per CVSS 4.0 vector) - described as a 'system software adversary with a privileged user'; (3) no user interaction is required (UI:N); (4) no special attack timing or environmental conditions are needed (AT:N, AC:L). What limits exploitation: the requirement for pre-existing high privileges is the critical barrier - this is not a remote or unauthenticated attack path. The vulnerability is scoped to the TDX guest environment and does not affect the host, hypervisor, or subsequent systems (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Systems not deploying Intel TDX Guest software or running version 0.3.1 and above are not affected.

Impact

Real-world risk is moderate-to-low despite the privilege escalation label. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H) demands local access and high prior privileges, meaning an attacker must already be a privileged user on the guest system - significantly narrowing the attack surface. The CVSS 4.0 score of 4.6 reflects this constrained impact (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L). No EPSS data was provided, and there is no CISA KEV listing or known public exploit, further reducing urgency. The attack complexity is low (AC:L) and no special attack timing or conditions (AT:N) are required, meaning exploitation is straightforward once the attacker holds the required privilege level - but reaching that level is itself a prerequisite barrier. The scope is strictly contained to the vulnerable guest system (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N), making lateral movement or hypervisor escape scenarios unsupported by this CVE alone. This is a real but low-priority vulnerability: environments running TDX workloads with strict privilege separation should still patch, as privilege escalation within a confidential compute guest can undermine the isolation guarantees TDX is designed to provide.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local user who already holds high system-level privileges within an Intel TDX guest environment triggers the incorrect comparison in the Ring 3 TDX Guest software, causing the flawed logic to elevate their effective privilege level further within the guest. No public proof-of-concept has been identified, but the low attack complexity (AC:L) means exploitation requires no special timing or conditions beyond the initial privileged foothold. The impact is confined to the guest system, with no evidence this chain can be used to escape the TDX boundary into the hypervisor or host.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Privilege escalation in Intel TDX Guest software before version 0.3.1 stems from an incorrect comparison (CWE-697) within Ring 3 user application space, exploitable by a local attacker who already holds high system privileges. Impact is limited - low confidentiality, integrity, and availability degradation on the vulnerable guest system with no subsequent system impact - aligning with the CVSS 4.0 score of 4.6. No public exploit code or active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been identified at time of analysis; Intel has released a fix at version 0.3.1 via advisory INTEL-SA-01462.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is upgrading Intel TDX Guest software to version 0.3.1 or later, as released by Intel via advisory INTEL-SA-01462 (https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01462.html). Operators should consult their TDX Guest software distribution channel or upstream repository for the patched package. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not possible, restricting which users hold high-privilege access within TDX guest environments directly eliminates the exploitation prerequisite - since PR:H is required, tightening privileged account provisioning and enforcing least-privilege within guest VMs reduces exposure. Additionally, monitoring for unexpected privilege transitions within TDX guests can serve as a detection layer. Note that these compensating controls do not eliminate the underlying comparison flaw; patching remains the definitive resolution.

Affected VersionsENISA

Intel(R) TDX Guest software before version 0.3.1

Affected Packages

euvd intel_r_tdx_guest_software_before_version no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) is a hardware-assisted confidential computing technology that isolates virtual machines (Trust Domains) from the hypervisor and other software using hardware-enforced boundaries. The affected component is the TDX Guest software stack running in Ring 3 (unprivileged user application space), which interfaces with TDX hardware primitives. CWE-697 (Incorrect Comparison) indicates the flaw involves a logic error in a comparison operation - such as comparing signed vs. unsigned integers, mismatched types, or improper boundary checks - that can be manipulated to produce unintended control flow outcomes leading to privilege escalation within the guest environment. The CPE string (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_tdx_guest_software) reflects this as an application-layer component rather than a firmware or kernel-level artifact, scoping it to the guest software runtime specifically. The vulnerability does not appear to cross the TDX boundary into the host or hypervisor, consistent with SC:N/SI:N/SA:N in the CVSS 4.0 vector.

Know when N A gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (intel) PRIMARY 4.6 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 4.2 MEDIUM

Local-only access (AV:L), pre-existing high privileges required (PR:H), and impact limited to low C/I/A with no scope change per description and vendor 4.0 vector.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (intel).

CVSS VectorVendor: intel

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Incorrect comparison for some Intel(R) TDX Guest software before version 0.3.1 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
emerging confidential computing tech, limited enterprise deployment
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

23
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +23
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2024-51092 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 08

LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr

CVE-2025-15684 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 12

Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han

CVE-2024-45257 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi

CVE-2025-15687 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc

CVE-2025-15686 LOW POC
2.1 Aug 12

Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula

CVE-2025-67888 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root

CVE-2024-53326 HIGH POC
7.3 May 08

LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(

CVE-2026-38360 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 08

Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti

CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy