Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach Finesse management interface
-
DeliverySend crafted HTTP request
-
ExploitTrigger SSRF via improper input validation
-
ExecutionServer queries associated back-end services
-
ImpactObtain limited sensitive information
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network access to the Cisco Finesse web-based management interface, which must be reachable by the attacker; the flaw is improper input validation of specific HTTP requests, so sending a single crafted HTTP request to that interface suffices with no authentication, no privileges, and no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N against default configurations). The practical limiting factors are: (1) the management interface is frequently segmented on internal/management networks rather than internet-exposed, constraining who can reach it; and (2) impact is bounded to 'limited sensitive information' from services associated with the device, not full data access or control. No special non-default feature or configuration mode is named as a prerequisite in the description. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes a remotely reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw, which normally signals high priority; however, the impact metrics are deliberately modest (C:L/I:L/A:N) and the vendor-assigned 7.2 score is driven largely by the scope change (S:C) rather than by severe direct impact. This is an SSRF (CWE-918) that, per Cisco's own description, yields only 'limited sensitive information' - not code execution, full data disclosure, or service disruption. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided data, so there is currently no evidence of active exploitation or weaponization; exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' Net assessment: a genuine but moderate-priority issue - the unauthenticated network reachability warrants patching, but the limited confidentiality/integrity impact and absence of exploitation signals place it below critical RCE-class bugs. Note the Cisco-assigned I:L is not substantiated by the description text, which mentions only information disclosure (confidentiality); verify the integrity claim with the vendor advisory. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network reachability to the Cisco Finesse web-based management interface sends a crafted HTTP request that the server fails to validate, coercing the server into making attacker-influenced requests to internal/associated back-end services. The attacker uses the resulting SSRF to retrieve limited sensitive information from services the Finesse host can reach. No authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N/UI:N), but no public exploit code is identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 07, 2026
Unauthenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the Cisco Finesse web-based management interface lets remote attackers send crafted HTTP requests that cause the device to make requests to associated services, potentially exposing limited sensitive information. The flaw is caused by improper input validation for specific HTTP requests and requires network reachability to the management interface but no credentials or user interaction; CVSS 3.1 score is 7.2, driven largely by scope change rather than severe direct impact. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Cisco's advisory at https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-finesse-ssrf-mmSuyugS is the authoritative source for fixed software; no exact fix version was included in the supplied data, so obtain and apply the vendor-recommended release when confirmed. Until patching is possible, restrict access to the Finesse web-based management interface with management-network ACLs, VPN-only access, or a jump host so only trusted administrative sources can reach it; the trade-off is reduced remote management convenience and possible operational delays. Also limit outbound traffic from Finesse to unexpected internal services and monitor logs for SSRF-shaped requests, accepting some added operational overhead and potential false positives.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) in Cisco Finesse arises from improper validation of input in the web-based management interface's handling of specific HTTP requests. An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft a request that makes the Finesse server initiate outbound connections to services associated with the affected device, yielding limited sensitive information rather than full control or broad data access. The assessed CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N indicates remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with scope change and limited confidentiality impact; the CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_finesse:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies Cisco Finesse broadly, and the advisory at https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-finesse-ssrf-mmSuyugS should be consulted for exact affected and fixed releases.
Know when Cisco Finesse gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Unauthenticated single crafted request gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N; SSRF reaching associated services gives S:C/C:L; description cites only info disclosure, so I:N (diverges from Cisco's I:L) and A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).
CVSS VectorVendor: cisco
DescriptionCVE.org
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Finesse could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks through an affected device.
This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain limited sensitive information for services that are associated with the affected device.
Executive ViewAI
Cisco Finesse deployments that expose their web management interface to reachable networks are affected by a server-side request forgery flaw that could allow an outside party to make the system issue requests to services it trusts, with the potential for limited sensitive information disclosure. Because the affected component underpins contact center agent and supervisor operations, an exploitation attempt or an unpatched exposure carries operational risk to customer-facing service continuity, not just data risk. Leadership should care because no vendor patch is currently available, so protection depends entirely on how tightly the management plane is segmented and monitored.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict network reachability to the Finesse management interface to a hardened administrative segment or VPN with IP allow-listing and MFA; block the management interface at perimeter and inter-zone firewalls; apply egress filtering on Finesse hosts so they cannot reach unapproved internal services; proxy and log management traffic, and alert on anomalous outbound requests originating from Finesse.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
EUVD-2026-94451
GHSA-q64m-jwqm-gm66
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB