Skip to main content

IBM Langflow OSS CVE-2026-19301

| EUVDEUVD-2026-71597 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-09-04 psirt@us.ibm.com GHSA-55jv-gc65-vxhp
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to Langflow with low-privilege account
  2. Delivery
    Craft workflow node or API call with internal/metadata URL
  3. Exploit
    Langflow server fetches attacker-controlled target
  4. Execution
    Response returned to attacker containing sensitive data
  5. Impact
    Attacker harvests credentials or internal service details

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid authenticated account on the IBM Langflow OSS instance (PR:L per CVSS vector). The attacker must have access to a workflow creation or API endpoint that accepts user-supplied URL or resource parameters. Severity is highest on cloud-hosted deployments where AWS IMDSv1, GCP metadata, or internal APIs are reachable from the application server. Limiting factors include: the authentication requirement prevents anonymous exploitation; environments enforcing AWS IMDSv2 (token-required) are not vulnerable to the most critical metadata pivot; strict server-side egress filtering or network segmentation constrains reachable internal targets; and on-premises deployments with no cloud metadata services face only limited internal network reconnaissance impact.

Impact

The CVSS 5.0 Medium score reflects a genuinely bounded but non-trivial risk. The PR:L prerequisite (authenticated low-privilege user) is a meaningful barrier in controlled deployments. However, the S:C scope change is the critical risk amplifier: SSRF in a server-side AI platform can pivot to cloud instance metadata services (AWS IMDSv1, GCP metadata) and return IAM credentials, enabling privilege escalation far exceeding the C:L ceiling on the vulnerable system itself. In enterprise AI/ML environments, Langflow instances often run with broad cloud IAM permissions to access model endpoints and data stores, making metadata SSRF especially impactful. Conversely, environments enforcing AWS IMDSv2 (token-required), strict egress filtering, or non-cloud on-premises deployments see substantially reduced real-world impact. No KEV listing and no POC availability are mitigating signals; EPSS data was not provided. The realistic priority is highest for cloud-deployed, multi-tenant, or externally-accessible Langflow instances.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a low-privilege Langflow account crafts a workflow node or API call that supplies the URL http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ as a resource target. The Langflow server fetches this address and returns AWS IAM role credentials in the response, which the attacker captures to escalate privileges within the cloud environment. No public exploit code is required - the attack uses standard HTTP tooling against the authenticated API.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 04, 2026

Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 allows authenticated remote attackers to leverage the application server as a proxy to reach internal network resources, exposing sensitive information from systems not directly accessible to the attacker. The CVSS S:C scope-change metric signals that the primary risk extends beyond the vulnerable component itself - cloud-hosted instances are particularly exposed to metadata-service credential theft via endpoints like AWS IMDSv1. No public exploit code or active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Consult the IBM advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285639 for the vendor-released patch version - the exact fix version is not specified in the available input data (patch available per vendor advisory). As compensating controls pending upgrade: restrict Langflow access to authenticated, least-privileged internal users only and block external-facing exposure. On cloud deployments, enforce IMDSv2 (token-required mode on AWS) to block the most damaging metadata SSRF pivot, and apply egress firewall rules blocking server-initiated connections to RFC-1918 ranges, link-local addresses (169.254.0.0/16), and loopback. Note that egress filtering may break legitimate Langflow workflow nodes that fetch external model endpoints - audit outbound traffic before enforcement. On-premises deployments with no cloud metadata endpoint see substantially reduced impact from this vulnerability.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.11.2

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM Langflow OSS is IBM's enterprise distribution of Langflow, a visual low-code framework for building AI/LLM-powered agent workflows. CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) arises when the application accepts user-controlled URLs or resource identifiers in workflow nodes or API endpoints - such as those that load external datasets, connect to model inference APIs, or import flow components - without validating that destination addresses are restricted to permitted hosts. An authenticated attacker supplies crafted URLs (e.g., http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ for AWS IMDSv1, or internal intranet hosts) causing the Langflow server to fetch and return responses that can reveal cloud credentials, internal API responses, or network topology. Affected versions span 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 per IBM's advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285639.

Know when Langflow gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.0 MEDIUM

Agrees with vendor vector: authenticated (PR:L), network-reachable, scope change to internal systems (S:C), confidentiality-only limited impact (C:L/I:N/A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
Sep 08, 2026 - 22:23 NVD
5.0 (MEDIUM) 6.5 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionNVD

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
IBM-specific enterprise distribution of niche AI workflow tool
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2025-3248 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Langflow before 1.3.0 allows unauthenticated remote code injection through the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint, enabling

CVE-2026-0770 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 23

Langflow has a third RCE vulnerability via exec_globals (EPSS 10.0%) allowing inclusion of untrusted code that executes

CVE-2025-34291 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 05

Account takeover and remote code execution in Langflow AI workflow platform versions ≤1.6.9 due to a CORS misconfigurati

CVE-2026-0768 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 23

Langflow has a code injection vulnerability in the code component (EPSS 2.6%) enabling remote code execution through the

CVE-2026-0769 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 23

Langflow has an eval injection in eval_custom_component_code (EPSS 2.0%) enabling remote code execution through crafted

CVE-2026-10134 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 30

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject and run arbitrary

CVE-2026-27966 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 26

Code injection in Langflow CSV Agent node before 1.8.0. The node hardcodes allow_dangerous_code=True, enabling arbitrary

CVE-2024-37014 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 10

Langflow through 0.6.19 allows remote code execution if untrusted users are able to reach the "POST /api/v1/custom_compo

CVE-2026-105697 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Oct 05

OS command injection in Langflow's MCP stdio transport allows an attacker who can reach the MCP server configuration end

CVE-2024-48061 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 04

langflow <=1.0.18 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) as any component provided the code functionality and the

CVE-2024-42835 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 31

langflow v1.0.12 was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the PythonCodeTool component.

CVE-2026-21445 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Jan 02

Langflow before 1.7.0.dev45 exposes multiple API endpoints without authentication, allowing unauthenticated access to us

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy