Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to Langflow with low-privilege account
-
DeliveryCraft workflow node or API call with internal/metadata URL
-
ExploitLangflow server fetches attacker-controlled target
-
ExecutionResponse returned to attacker containing sensitive data
-
ImpactAttacker harvests credentials or internal service details
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid authenticated account on the IBM Langflow OSS instance (PR:L per CVSS vector). The attacker must have access to a workflow creation or API endpoint that accepts user-supplied URL or resource parameters. Severity is highest on cloud-hosted deployments where AWS IMDSv1, GCP metadata, or internal APIs are reachable from the application server. Limiting factors include: the authentication requirement prevents anonymous exploitation; environments enforcing AWS IMDSv2 (token-required) are not vulnerable to the most critical metadata pivot; strict server-side egress filtering or network segmentation constrains reachable internal targets; and on-premises deployments with no cloud metadata services face only limited internal network reconnaissance impact. |
| Impact | The CVSS 5.0 Medium score reflects a genuinely bounded but non-trivial risk. The PR:L prerequisite (authenticated low-privilege user) is a meaningful barrier in controlled deployments. However, the S:C scope change is the critical risk amplifier: SSRF in a server-side AI platform can pivot to cloud instance metadata services (AWS IMDSv1, GCP metadata) and return IAM credentials, enabling privilege escalation far exceeding the C:L ceiling on the vulnerable system itself. In enterprise AI/ML environments, Langflow instances often run with broad cloud IAM permissions to access model endpoints and data stores, making metadata SSRF especially impactful. Conversely, environments enforcing AWS IMDSv2 (token-required), strict egress filtering, or non-cloud on-premises deployments see substantially reduced real-world impact. No KEV listing and no POC availability are mitigating signals; EPSS data was not provided. The realistic priority is highest for cloud-deployed, multi-tenant, or externally-accessible Langflow instances. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a low-privilege Langflow account crafts a workflow node or API call that supplies the URL http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ as a resource target. The Langflow server fetches this address and returns AWS IAM role credentials in the response, which the attacker captures to escalate privileges within the cloud environment. No public exploit code is required - the attack uses standard HTTP tooling against the authenticated API. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 04, 2026
Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 allows authenticated remote attackers to leverage the application server as a proxy to reach internal network resources, exposing sensitive information from systems not directly accessible to the attacker. The CVSS S:C scope-change metric signals that the primary risk extends beyond the vulnerable component itself - cloud-hosted instances are particularly exposed to metadata-service credential theft via endpoints like AWS IMDSv1. No public exploit code or active exploitation (CISA KEV) has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Consult the IBM advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285639 for the vendor-released patch version - the exact fix version is not specified in the available input data (patch available per vendor advisory). As compensating controls pending upgrade: restrict Langflow access to authenticated, least-privileged internal users only and block external-facing exposure. On cloud deployments, enforce IMDSv2 (token-required mode on AWS) to block the most damaging metadata SSRF pivot, and apply egress firewall rules blocking server-initiated connections to RFC-1918 ranges, link-local addresses (169.254.0.0/16), and loopback. Note that egress filtering may break legitimate Langflow workflow nodes that fetch external model endpoints - audit outbound traffic before enforcement. On-premises deployments with no cloud metadata endpoint see substantially reduced impact from this vulnerability.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM Langflow OSS is IBM's enterprise distribution of Langflow, a visual low-code framework for building AI/LLM-powered agent workflows. CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery) arises when the application accepts user-controlled URLs or resource identifiers in workflow nodes or API endpoints - such as those that load external datasets, connect to model inference APIs, or import flow components - without validating that destination addresses are restricted to permitted hosts. An authenticated attacker supplies crafted URLs (e.g., http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ for AWS IMDSv1, or internal intranet hosts) causing the Langflow server to fetch and return responses that can reveal cloud credentials, internal API responses, or network topology. Affected versions span 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 per IBM's advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7285639.
Know when Langflow gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Agrees with vendor vector: authenticated (PR:L), network-reachable, scope change to internal systems (S:C), confidentiality-only limited impact (C:L/I:N/A:N).
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionNVD
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
Langflow before 1.3.0 allows unauthenticated remote code injection through the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint, enabling
Langflow has a third RCE vulnerability via exec_globals (EPSS 10.0%) allowing inclusion of untrusted code that executes
Account takeover and remote code execution in Langflow AI workflow platform versions ≤1.6.9 due to a CORS misconfigurati
Langflow has a code injection vulnerability in the code component (EPSS 2.6%) enabling remote code execution through the
Langflow has an eval injection in eval_custom_component_code (EPSS 2.0%) enabling remote code execution through crafted
Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 lets an unauthenticated attacker inject and run arbitrary
Code injection in Langflow CSV Agent node before 1.8.0. The node hardcodes allow_dangerous_code=True, enabling arbitrary
Langflow through 0.6.19 allows remote code execution if untrusted users are able to reach the "POST /api/v1/custom_compo
OS command injection in Langflow's MCP stdio transport allows an attacker who can reach the MCP server configuration end
langflow <=1.0.18 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) as any component provided the code functionality and the
langflow v1.0.12 was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the PythonCodeTool component.
Langflow before 1.7.0.dev45 exposes multiple API endpoints without authentication, allowing unauthenticated access to us
EUVD-2026-71597
GHSA-55jv-gc65-vxhp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB