Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain project credential-store management rights
-
DeliveryConfigure Vault store/library targeting internal endpoint
-
ExploitController issues attacker-chosen outbound request
-
ExecutionResponse returned to requester
-
ImpactHarvest metadata / internal service data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated Boundary user who already holds project-level permission to manage credential stores and credential libraries, and the Vault credential store integration must be in use; the attacker abuses that configuration path to set an arbitrary request destination. Exploitation is limited by this high-privilege prerequisite (PR:H) - it is an insider or compromised-account scenario, not anonymous access. Real-world impact is greatest when the controller host can reach sensitive internal-only endpoints such as a cloud instance metadata service; in deployments where no such internal endpoints are reachable from the controller, the practical value to an attacker is reduced. |
| Impact | This is a credible, moderately prioritized issue rather than a drop-everything emergency, and the signals are largely consistent. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N, base 8.7) shows a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw whose single real gate is privilege: PR:H means the attacker must already hold project-level rights to manage credential stores and credential libraries, so this is an authenticated-insider or compromised-operator scenario, not an anonymous internet attack. The scope change (S:C) is well justified because the Boundary controller is coerced into reaching systems and network segments the attacker otherwise cannot touch. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week', which aligns with a serious-but-gated SSRF; no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score were provided, and no public exploit was supplied, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation at time of analysis. The main caveat: the description says both Boundary and Boundary Enterprise are affected, but the input only lists fixes for 'Boundary Enterprise 1.0.2 and 0.21.6' - verify the fixed build for the community/OSS edition with HashiCorp. Overall this warrants prompt patching, especially where the Boundary controller runs in a cloud environment with reachable instance metadata, but the PR:H requirement meaningfully constrains real-world exploitability. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated Boundary user who holds permission to manage credential stores and credential libraries in a project configures a Vault credential store (or library) pointing at an attacker-chosen address, causing the controller to issue an outbound request to that destination and return the response to the requester. Because the request originates from the controller's host, the attacker can reach internal-only endpoints such as a cloud instance metadata service (e.g., 169.254.169.254) and read the response. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 29, 2026
Server-side request forgery in the HashiCorp Boundary and Boundary Enterprise Vault credential store integration allows an authenticated user holding project-level permission to manage credential stores and credential libraries to make the Boundary controller issue outbound requests to a destination of their choosing and return the response to them. Affected deployments are those using the Vault credential store integration; the issue is fixed in Boundary Enterprise 1.0.2 and 0.21.6, and exposure is greatest where the controller host can reach internal-only endpoints such as a cloud instance metadata service. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H), so this is an insider or compromised-privileged-account scenario prioritized this_week rather than an emergency.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Boundary Enterprise 1.0.2 or 0.21.6 as listed in HCSEC-2026-54 (https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-54-boundary-vulnerable-to-server-side-request-forgery-in-vault-credential-store/77932); the advisory does not document a configuration workaround, so upgrading is the complete fix. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, reduce exposure along the two prerequisites the issue depends on: audit and tighten project-level grants that allow managing credential stores and credential libraries, since only principals with that permission can reach the vulnerable code path - the trade-off is that legitimate Boundary administrators may need alternative roles or approval workflows. Additionally, restrict outbound egress from controller hosts so that link-local metadata addresses and internal-only management endpoints are unreachable while the controller retains access to its legitimate Vault endpoint; the trade-off is that this requires an accurate egress allow-list that must be maintained as Vault addresses change, and enforcing IMDSv2 on cloud instances reduces but does not remove exposure from the controller's network position.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a classic server-side request forgery (CWE-918) in the Boundary controller's Vault credential store integration. Boundary brokers credentials through an external Vault deployment, and an administrator of a project's credential stores and credential libraries can configure where that integration points; because the destination is not adequately constrained, the controller will originate an outbound request to an arbitrary network location and surface the returned response to the requester. This is full-read SSRF rather than blind SSRF, which is why the scope is marked changed (S:C) and confidentiality is rated high - the controller's network position differs from the attacker's, so the attacker inherits access to endpoints reachable only from the controller host, most notably cloud instance metadata services. The exact code path and request-triggering mechanism are not described in the available sources; the confirmed prerequisites are an authenticated Boundary principal with manage rights on credential stores and credential libraries in a project, plus a deployment that actually uses the Vault credential store integration. Our assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N) differs from the 8.7 score in the upstream data in rating integrity impact as low rather than high, reflecting that the demonstrated primitive is data retrieval from reachable endpoints rather than confirmed modification of controller or Vault state.
Know when Hashicorp gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Requires high-privilege credential-store management rights (PR:H); controller reaches internal systems (S:C); primary impact is reading responses (C:H) with limited integrity from attacker-chosen requests (I:L).
Primary rating from Vendor (hashicorp).
CVSS VectorVendor: hashicorp
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
HashiCorp Boundary and Boundary Enterprise are vulnerable to a server-side request forgery in the Vault credential store integration that may allow an authenticated user with permission to manage credential stores and credential libraries within a project to cause the Boundary controller to issue outbound requests to a network destination of the requester's choosing and to receive the response. This may expose endpoints reachable only from the controller's host, such as a cloud instance metadata service. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-13303, is fixed in Boundary Enterprise 1.0.2 and 0.21.6.
Articles & Coverage 2
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-13303 is a high-severity server-side request forgery (CVSS 8.7) in HashiCorp Boundary's Vault credential store integration, affecting organizations that use this feature. An authenticated user with project-level permissions to manage credential stores and libraries could force the Boundary controller to make requests to internal destinations-such as cloud metadata services-and view the responses, potentially exposing sensitive infrastructure details. While no public exploit code currently exists and the attack requires high privileges (an insider or compromised privileged account), the risk is elevated for environments where controllers can reach internal-only endpoints.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict outbound network access from Boundary controllers to only necessary destinations, especially blocking access to cloud metadata services; reduce project-level privileges to manage credential stores and libraries to a minimal set of trusted administrators; monitor controller egress for anomalous requests and review logs for signs of abuse.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
Credential-harvesting malware compromised 84 versions of 42 TanStack npm packages on 2026-05-11 via chained GitHub Actio
Unauthenticated remote attackers can trigger complete database overwrites, server-side file reads, and SSRF attacks agai
HashiCorp Terraform’s Vault Provider (terraform-provider-vault) did not correctly configure GCE-type bound labels for Va
An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the Password Vault Web Access (PVWA) of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault
PhotoRange Photo Vault 1.2 appends the password to the URI for authorization, which makes it easier for remote attackers
The REST API in CyberArk Password Vault Web Access before 9.9.5 and 10.x before 10.1 allows remote attackers to execute
Server-side request forgery in bank-vaults vault-secrets-webhook (<= 1.22.2) lets a low-privileged tenant with ConfigMap
Account takeover in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.6.0 lets a low-privileged organization member steal any oth
vault-cli is a configurable command-line interface tool (and python library) to interact with Hashicorp Vault. Rated cri
The SRP-6a implementation in Kee Vault KeePassRPC before 1.12.0 is missing validation for a client-provided parameter, w
The SRP-6a implementation in Kee Vault KeePassRPC before 1.12.0 generates insufficiently random numbers, which allows re
Server-side request forgery in the Ruby css_parser gem (< 3.0.0) lets a remote unauthenticated attacker force the parsin
EUVD-2026-113390
GHSA-ff4v-fpcj-mjf6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB