Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network, unauthenticated, no user interaction, but a divergent front-end/back-end proxy pairing is needed (AC:H); smuggling yields high confidentiality and integrity impact with no direct availability effect (A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
6DescriptionNVD
IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 and IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6 are affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability.
AnalysisAI
HTTP request smuggling in IBM WebSphere Application Server (traditional 8.5 and 9.0) and WebSphere Liberty (17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6) lets remote attackers desynchronize how front-end proxies and the WebSphere back-end parse HTTP request boundaries, enabling request-queue poisoning, security-control bypass, and disclosure of other users' data (tagged Information Disclosure). The CVSS 9.8 vector rates all impacts high, but SSVC records no observed exploitation and EPSS is low (0.34%); no public exploit is identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available. Realistic exploitation depends on WebSphere sitting behind an intermediary that disagrees with it on request framing.
Technical ContextAI
The affected technology is IBM's Java/Jakarta EE application server in two forms - the traditional WebSphere Application Server (WAS 8.5, 9.0) and the lightweight WebSphere Liberty runtime (17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6), matching CPEs cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server and cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server_-_liberty. The root cause is CWE-444, Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling'): when two HTTP agents in a chain (typically a reverse proxy, load balancer, or CDN in front of WebSphere) disagree on where one request ends and the next begins - usually through conflicting Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding handling or malformed chunked encoding - an attacker can smuggle a second request past the front-end that the back-end treats as belonging to another connection or user. This is a parsing/boundary defect in the HTTP transport layer rather than in application code, so it can affect any application hosted on the vulnerable server.
RemediationAI
Patch available per IBM advisory (https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7277550): apply the IBM-provided interim fix/iFix or fix pack for your specific WebSphere edition and release - for traditional WAS 8.5 and 9.0 install the recommended APAR/iFix, and for Liberty upgrade to the fixed release above 26.0.0.6 as directed by IBM (the exact fix version is specified on the IBM support node and is not reproduced here to avoid inventing a number). If immediate patching is not possible, reduce exposure at the intermediary layer: configure the front-end proxy, load balancer, or CDN to reject ambiguous requests containing both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers, normalize or strip Transfer-Encoding, and drop malformed chunked-encoding requests - the trade-off is that some legitimate but non-conformant clients may be rejected. Ensure the proxy and WebSphere agree on HTTP framing (prefer HTTP/2 to the back-end or strict HTTP/1.1 conformance where supported), and restrict direct network access to the WebSphere HTTP ports so requests cannot bypass the hardened intermediary; the side effects are added latency, configuration complexity, and potential breakage of legacy integrations.
More in Websphere Application Server
View allIBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system with
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 through 6.1.0.47, 7.0 before 7.0.0.39, 8.0 before 8.0.0.11, and 8.5 before 8.
The JMX Remoting functionality in Apache Geronimo 3.x before 3.0.1, as used in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) Co
Unspecified vulnerability in the IBM HTTP Server component 5.3 in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) for z/OS allows
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the sys
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0 before 7.0.0.43, 8.0 before 8.0.0.13, 8.5 before 8.5.5.11, 9.0 before 9.0.0.2
Unspecified vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1, 7.0 before 7.0.0.27, 8.0, and 8.5 has unknown i
Pre-authentication unsafe deserialization in IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 traditional allows remote unau
Unsafe class loading in the ORB (Object Request Broker) component of IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, 9.0, and Libe
Remote code execution in IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 (traditional) allows an unauthenticated network at
Server-side request forgery in IBM WebSphere Application Server (traditional 9.0 and 8.5) and WebSphere Application Serv
Authentication bypass in IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to send a
Same weakness CWE-444 – HTTP Request/Response Smuggling
View allSame technique Request Smuggling
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-40413
GHSA-974x-wv37-rccw