Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach Traefik HTTP non-TLS entry point
-
ExploitSend request with target Ingress host header
-
Executionssl-passthrough router omits auth annotations
-
ImpactAccess protected backend unauthenticated and unlogged
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Authentication required for critical functions
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Initial Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a specific deployment: Traefik v3.7.13 (before v3.7.14) using the Kubernetes Ingress NGINX provider, with an ssl-passthrough Ingress whose backend relies on auth-type, auth-url, or whitelist-source-range annotations for protection, AND a non-TLS (plain HTTP) entry point exposed and reachable by the attacker. The attacker must also know or supply the correct Ingress host. Limiting factors: the flaw only manifests on the HTTP (non-TLS) router generated for ssl-passthrough Ingresses - deployments without ssl-passthrough, without a non-TLS entry point, or not using the Ingress NGINX provider are not affected. No authentication or user interaction is required once these conditions are met (PR:N/UI:N), and the bypass is not logged, hindering detection. |
| Impact | This is a genuine access-control bypass (CWE-306) rather than a high-CVSS-but-low-impact issue, but its real-world priority is strongly gated by configuration rather than being broadly exploitable. The CVSS 4.0 vector (CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N) confirms network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated access with no user interaction - but critically sets AT:P (attack requirements present), reflecting that the vulnerable deployment path (ssl-passthrough Ingress exposed on a non-TLS entry point) must exist. Note the impact split: the vulnerable system (Traefik itself) shows VC:N/VI:N/VA:N while subsequent systems score SC:H/SI:H - the damage is entirely downstream, where protected backends become reachable. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was provided in the input, so exploitation probability signals are absent; per the data, there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The aggravating factor is stealth: the advisory states nothing is logged, meaning bypass attempts leave no trail and defenders cannot easily detect or retrospectively confirm compromise. For organizations running the affected Traefik build with this exact Ingress NGINX / ssl-passthrough configuration, this is a high-priority patch; for everyone else it is not reachable. The reported CVSS of 7.0 (High) is consistent with the vendor 4.0 vector. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An organization runs Traefik v3.7.13 as a Kubernetes ingress with the Ingress NGINX provider, and has an ssl-passthrough Ingress whose backend is protected by auth-url/auth-type or whitelist-source-range annotations, while also exposing a plain HTTP (non-TLS) entry point. An unauthenticated attacker on the network sends an HTTP request carrying the Ingress host header and is routed straight to the protected backend because the generated HTTP router silently omits the access-control annotations, with no log entry generated. No public exploit code was provided in the input, so this scenario is inferred from the advisory rather than a published POC. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 22, 2026
Access-control bypass in Traefik v3.7.13's Kubernetes Ingress NGINX provider allows unauthenticated remote attackers to reach ssl-passthrough Ingress backends protected by auth-type, auth-url, or whitelist-source-range annotations when a non-TLS entry point is exposed and the attacker knows the Ingress host. The flaw is configuration-gated-affected deployments must use the Ingress NGINX provider with ssl-passthrough Ingresses and a reachable plain HTTP entry point-and the bypass is silent because nothing is logged. No public exploit code or active exploitation is identified in the provided intelligence; upgrade to v3.7.14.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Traefik v3.7.14 or later, which is the vendor-released patch; see GHSA-qvj7-gq9c-hp7q and the VulnCheck advisory. If immediate upgrade is not possible, remove or disable non-TLS entry points for ssl-passthrough Ingresses and expose those Ingresses only via TLS entry points-this eliminates the vulnerable HTTP router but may break legitimate plain HTTP traffic. Alternatively, restrict access to the HTTP entry point with network policies or firewall rules to trusted sources, or enforce authentication and source-IP allowlisting at the backend or an external proxy instead of relying on the ignored Ingress annotations; these compensating controls reduce exposure but add operational complexity and do not fix the underlying bypass. Because the bypass is not logged, monitor for anomalous access to protected backends.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CVE-2026-114636 is a CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function) flaw in Traefik v3.7.13's Kubernetes Ingress NGINX provider. When an Ingress uses ssl-passthrough and Traefik also exposes a non-TLS entry point, Traefik generates an HTTP router for that Ingress; unlike the TLS router, the HTTP router does not propagate the Ingress's access-control annotations (auth-type, auth-url, whitelist-source-range), so requests to the plain HTTP entry point bypass the intended authentication or source-IP restrictions. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:traefik:traefik:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, but the vendor advisory narrows the issue to v3.7.13 before v3.7.14. Exploitation requires the attacker to supply the correct Ingress host and to reach the non-TLS entry point; deployments without ssl-passthrough Ingresses, without a non-TLS entry point, or not using the Ingress NGINX provider are not affected. The bypass is not logged, which complicates detection, and the independent assessment stresses that real-world priority is strongly gated by configuration rather than broad exploitability.
Know when Traefik gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N
Unauthenticated network bypass (PR:N) but requires a specific ssl-passthrough/non-TLS Ingress NGINX configuration (AC:H); scope changes to downstream backends (S:C) with high confidentiality/integrity exposure and no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Traefik v3.7.13 before v3.7.14 contains an access-control bypass in the Kubernetes Ingress NGINX provider, where the HTTP router generated for ssl-passthrough Ingresses on non-TLS entry points never applies the Ingress's access-control annotations. Unauthenticated attackers reaching the HTTP entry point with the Ingress host can access backends protected by auth-type, auth-url, or whitelist-source-range annotations, with nothing logged.
Articles & Coverage 1
Technical POC Analysis
CWE-306, missing authentication for critical function.
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
Traefik v3.7.13's Kubernetes Ingress NGINX provider can be configured in a way that silently skips the authentication and source-IP allowlisting protecting ssl-passthrough Ingress backends, letting a remote party who knows the Ingress host name reach services that were meant to be gated. Exposure is configuration-gated, requiring the Ingress NGINX provider, ssl-passthrough Ingresses, and a reachable plain HTTP entry point, so leadership should treat this as a targeted risk to specific entry points rather than a blanket product compromise. Because the bypass produces no log entry, affected teams may not learn about it from monitoring alone; no public exploit code or active exploitation is identified at time of analysis.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis per the provided patch status, though vendor guidance in the supplied intelligence references upgrading to v3.7.14. Interim mitigations: remove or disable non-TLS entry points fronting ssl-passthrough Ingresses; block plain HTTP access to those host names at the edge; relocate enforcement of auth-type, auth-url, and whitelist-source-range to an upstream proxy, load balancer, or service mesh; and enable edge or upstream logging to surface silent bypass attempts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Backend connection hijacking in Traefik reverse proxy (2.11.0 through 2.11.56 and 3.0.0 through 3.7.12) lets an unauthen
HTTP/1 request-target parsing in Traefik prior to 2.11.57 and 3.7.13 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to send a r
Authentication bypass in the Traefik reverse proxy (v2.11.51 and earlier, v3.6.0-v3.6.22, and v3.7.0-v3.7.6) allows unau
Route-level authentication bypass in Traefik v3.7.0-v3.7.7 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to reach backend endp
Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is re
types/types.go in Containous Traefik 1.7.x through 1.7.11, when the --api flag is used and the API is publicly reachable
Security middleware bypass in Traefik reverse proxy versions 2.11.26-2.11.56 and 3.4.2-3.7.12 allows unauthenticated net
Traefik's header-security defenses (aliasHeadersStrategy, underscoreHeadersStrategy, forwardedHeaders) inspect req.Heade
Path normalization bypass in Traefik allows unauthenticated remote attackers to circumvent the middleware chain on path-
Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability is
Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability is
EUVD-2026-107891
GHSA-754r-9m79-cq7g
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB