Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconIdentify target running Chrome <149.0.7827.53
-
DeliveryDeliver crafted page exploiting renderer RCE
-
ExploitAchieve code execution in renderer sandbox
-
InstallServe crafted HTML triggering Extensions validation flaw
-
C2Bypass IPC input validation
-
ExecuteEscape sandbox to browser process
-
ImpactAccess cookies, credentials, and local files
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must already have compromised the Chrome renderer process (the CVE description states this explicitly), making this a sandbox-escape link in a multi-bug chain rather than a standalone vulnerability - a separate renderer RCE is a hard prerequisite. The victim must then load and interact with a crafted HTML page (CVSS UI:R), and exploitation is rated AC:H, indicating non-trivial conditions such as specific timing, memory layout, or extension API state. The vulnerable code path is in the Extensions component, so deployments where Chrome's extension subsystem is fully disabled by enterprise policy face reduced (but not necessarily eliminated) exposure. Affected versions are Chrome below 149.0.7827.53 on Stable channel desktop builds. |
| Impact | The CVSS 7.5 score with vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R reflects a network-reachable issue but with high attack complexity and required user interaction, which is consistent with a second-stage bug that must be chained from a prior renderer RCE and triggered via a crafted page the victim visits. CISA's SSVC framework concurs that this is not a standalone priority: exploitation status is 'none', the bug is not automatable, but technical impact is 'total' - meaning if it is chained it fully breaks the sandbox. There is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS data provided, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so real-world risk today is moderate and primarily relevant to defenders concerned with sophisticated exploit chains (e.g., targeted attacks, n-day chaining) rather than mass exploitation. Note the apparent tension worth flagging: PR:N suggests no privileges, yet the description requires a pre-compromised renderer - Chromium's convention treats the renderer compromise as part of the attacker's setup rather than a CVSS prerequisite, so the vector is internally consistent with Chrome's threat model but can mislead readers who do not know this. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker first achieves arbitrary code execution inside the Chrome renderer process via a separate renderer-RCE bug (a common scenario in modern browser exploit chains), then serves the victim a crafted HTML page that, when interacted with, invokes the vulnerable Extensions code path with malformed input. The Extensions component mishandles that input and the attacker uses the gap to escape the renderer sandbox and execute code with browser-process privileges, giving access to cookies, stored credentials, and the local file system. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 05, 2026
Privilege escalation in Google Chrome's Extensions component prior to version 149.0.7827.53 allows a remote attacker who has already compromised the renderer process to escape sandbox restrictions via a crafted HTML page. Chromium rates the issue High severity; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and SSVC reports exploitation status as none, though the technical impact is total if chained successfully.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: update Google Chrome to 149.0.7827.53 or later via the Stable channel update documented at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html; on managed fleets, force a restart so the new binary is loaded rather than relying on background updater rollout. Users of Chromium-based browsers (Edge, Brave, Opera, Vivaldi) should install the corresponding upstream-pickup release from their vendor, and Electron-based applications should be rebuilt against a patched Chromium. As compensating controls while patching is pending, restrict installation of untrusted browser extensions via enterprise policy (ExtensionInstallAllowlist/Blocklist) to reduce the attack surface in the Extensions code path, and consider enabling site isolation strict mode if not already on; broad URL filtering will not stop this bug since the crafted HTML is delivered after a renderer compromise, so blunt URL blocks have limited value and high false-positive cost.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw resides in Chrome's Extensions subsystem, which mediates privileged browser APIs available to installed extensions and brokers messages between the lower-privileged renderer process and the higher-privileged browser process. CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) indicates the Extensions code fails to adequately validate data received from an untrusted source - specifically a renderer that an attacker has already taken over - allowing that input to be processed in a privileged context. Because Chromium's security model assumes the renderer is hostile and relies on IPC validation to maintain the sandbox boundary, a validation gap in Extensions effectively becomes a sandbox-escape primitive that elevates a renderer compromise into broader browser-process privileges.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (google).
CVSS VectorVendor: google
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Executive ViewAI
Google Chrome versions prior to 149.0.7827.53 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the Extensions component that could allow compromised renderer processes to escape sandbox restrictions. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; however, the vulnerability has high technical impact and requires organizational patching to maintain security posture.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allSame technique Privilege Escalation
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Tumbleweed | Fixed |
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-34418
GHSA-9crv-2mc9-w5vj
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB