Skip to main content

Edimax BR-6208AC CVE-2026-108935

| EUVDEUVD-2026-98154 LOW
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79)
2026-10-12 VulDB GHSA-59vc-32cc-jr2q
1.9
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to router admin panel
  2. Delivery
    Inject script via /goform/formPortFw
  3. Exploit
    Store payload in Port Forwarding entry
  4. Execution
    Victim admin loads Port Forwarding page
  5. Impact
    Script executes in admin browser session

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires authenticated administrative access to the BR-6208AC web management interface (PR:H) and targets the Port Forwarding configuration handler at /goform/formPortFw. The injected script only executes when a user - realistically an administrator - subsequently loads the affected Port Forwarding Page (UI:P/user interaction required). Limiting factors: the attacker must already hold high privileges on the device, a victim must view the malicious entry, and impact is restricted to script execution in the browser context (low integrity) with no direct confidentiality or availability effect. This is a config-page stored/reflected XSS, not a pre-auth remote flaw.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-priority issue despite the 'network' attack vector. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N) yields a Medium 4.8 score, and the key limiting metrics tell the real story: PR:H means the attacker already needs high (administrative) privileges on the router's web interface, and UI:P means a victim must interact for the payload to fire. Impact is confined to low integrity (VI:L) with no confidentiality or availability loss - consistent with reflected/stored XSS. Exploitation signals are mixed: a public PoC exists (GitHub), raising the Exploit Maturity to E:P, but there is NO CISA KEV listing and NO EPSS score was supplied, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. The requirement for pre-existing admin access largely collapses the practical threat - an attacker who can already authenticate as admin to a SOHO router has little to gain from XSS against that same admin panel, unless chaining via a lower-privileged or tricked administrator. Net: real but marginal risk; prioritize well below unauthenticated RCE or KEV-listed flaws.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with administrative access to the Edimax BR-6208AC web UI injects a malicious script into the Port Forwarding configuration via /goform/formPortFw; when an administrator subsequently views the Port Forwarding page, the script executes in their browser session. A public proof-of-concept is available on GitHub, lowering the effort to reproduce, but exploitation still requires both privileged access and victim interaction.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026

Cross-site scripting in Edimax BR-6208AC firmware 1.32 lets an authenticated administrator inject script through the /goform/formPortFw Port Forwarding handler; publicly available exploit code exists. Exploitation requires high privileges (PR:H) and user interaction (UI:P) when an administrator later views the affected Port Forwarding page, and the assessed impact is limited to low integrity with no direct confidentiality or availability effect. The vendor was contacted but did not respond, so no vendor-released patch is identified in the available data.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis; Edimax was reportedly contacted and did not respond. Primary remediation is to replace or isolate the Edimax BR-6208AC device, and if it must remain in use, restrict access to its web management interface to a trusted management VLAN or firewall ACL so that /goform/formPortFw cannot be reached from untrusted networks. Because exploitation requires authenticated administrative access and a victim viewing the crafted Port Forwarding entry, change default/admin credentials, avoid browsing the Port Forwarding Page after any untrusted configuration change, and review port-forwarding rules for unexpected content. Disabling WAN-side remote management is a useful workaround but the trade-off is loss of remote administration; strict network isolation reduces exposure but does not fix the XSS, and no patch or upgrade version is available from the input data to confirm.

Affected VersionsENISA

BR-6208AC 1.32

Affected Packages

euvd br_6208ac no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is CWE-79 improper neutralization of input during web page generation (cross-site scripting) in Edimax BR-6208AC firmware 1.32. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:edimax:br-6208ac:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies the Edimax BR-6208AC platform, with the specific tested firmware 1.32; the vulnerable component is the Port Forwarding Page handler at /goform/formPortFw. The handler processes port-forwarding configuration data but does not safely encode output, so injected markup or script can execute in the browser context of a user who loads the page. The CVSS 4.0 vector reports network reachability (AV:N) but high privileges (PR:H) and user interaction (UI:P), meaning the primary barriers are prior administrative access and a victim/admin viewing the crafted entry. The independent CVSS 3.1 assessment similarly frames this as a low-impact, privileged config-page XSS rather than a pre-authentication remote compromise.

Know when Br 6208Ac gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 1.9 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 3.4 LOW

Web-UI XSS reachable over the network (AV:N) but needs admin login (PR:H) and victim page view (UI:R); scope changes to the browser (S:C) with only low integrity impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Oct 12, 2026 - 23:22 NVD
MEDIUM LOW
CVSS changed
Oct 12, 2026 - 23:22 NVD
4.8 (MEDIUM) 1.9 (LOW)
CVE Published
Oct 12, 2026 - 22:15 cve.org
MEDIUM 4.8

DescriptionCVE.org

A weakness has been identified in Edimax BR-6208AC 1.32. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /goform/formPortFw of the component Port Forwarding Page. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche consumer/SOHO Wi-Fi router, limited and aging deployment footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Low

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy