Skip to main content

CordysCRM CVE-2026-108704

| EUVDEUVD-2026-96704 MEDIUM
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639)
2026-10-11 VulnCheck GHSA-7v2x-2f52-8cpm
5.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as low-privileged CRM user
  2. Exploit
    Set owner field to own user id
  3. Execution
    POST to follow/record/add endpoints
  4. Impact
    Overwrite follow_time and follower on target records

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Object-level authorization, IDOR prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid low-privileged authenticated account on the CordysCRM instance (PR:L) and knowledge of a target record ID for an existing customer, clue, or opportunity. The specific prerequisite is that the follow/record/add endpoints (CustomerFollowRecordController, ClueFollowRecordController, FollowUpRecordController / BaseFollowUpService) trust a client-supplied owner field as the permission check, so an attacker simply sets owner to their own user id to bypass ownership enforcement. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: exploitation is impossible without credentials, impact is confined to the integrity of follow-up records (follow_time, follower) with no confidentiality or availability effect, and the attacker must already know valid target record identifiers.

Impact

This is a moderate, authenticated-only authorization bypass (CWE-639, insecure direct object reference via a user-controlled owner field), not a top-tier priority. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) confirms network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation but requires existing low-privileged credentials (PR:L), so it is NOT unauthenticated. Impact is narrow: VI:L with VC:N and VA:N means integrity-only - an attacker can write/overwrite follow-up records (follow_time, follower) on records they do not own, but cannot read confidential data or cause availability loss. A public PoC exists (poc_follow_record_add.py), which raises practical exploitability, but there is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score was provided in the input, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. The signals are internally consistent (low-severity integrity flaw, authenticated vector, PoC available), so the realistic picture is a low-complexity but low-impact flaw that matters mainly for multi-tenant CRM deployments where data integrity and attribution matter. No EPSS or SSVC data was supplied; that absence is noted rather than inferred.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged authenticated CRM user crafts requests to the follow/record/add endpoints, setting the owner field to their own user id so the request passes the permission check, then adds or overwrites follow-up records on customers, clues, or opportunities they do not own. A public Python PoC (poc_follow_record_add.py) demonstrates this against known record IDs. Because CVSS is AV:N/AC:L, the requests are simple HTTP calls requiring only valid low-privilege credentials and no user interaction.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 11, 2026

Authorization bypass in CordysCRM through 1.9.3 allows low-privileged authenticated users to add follow-up records and overwrite follow_time and follower on any known customer, clue, or opportunity by setting the owner field to their own user id. Exploitation requires a valid low-privileged account and knowledge of a target record ID; the impact is limited to integrity of follow-up records with no confidentiality or availability effect. Publicly available exploit code exists, though CISA KEV does not list this as actively exploited. This is a moderate-priority authenticated-only vulnerability (CWE-639).

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is specified in the available data. The primary remediation is to upgrade CordysCRM beyond 1.9.3 once a fixed version is released; monitor the vendor advisory for updates. In the meantime, implement compensating controls: enforce server-side ownership checks that do not rely on client-supplied fields such as 'owner' in the follow-up record add endpoints, audit and restrict the ability to create follow-up records to users who legitimately own the target customer, clue, or opportunity, and monitor for anomalous additions or modifications to follow_time and follower fields. If follow-up record creation is not essential for low-privileged users, consider disabling or restricting access to the follow/record/add endpoints, though this will break follow-up functionality. Additionally, limit knowledge of record identifiers where possible and review access logs for suspicious activity. No public exploit mitigation beyond authentication and authorization hardening is available.

Affected VersionsENISA

CordysCRM 0 ≤1.9.3

Affected Packages

euvd cordyscrm no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is an instance of CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key), also known as insecure direct object reference (IDOR). The CordysCRM follow-up record add endpoints-CustomerFollowRecordController, ClueFollowRecordController, and FollowUpRecordController, supported by BaseFollowUpService-accept a client-supplied 'owner' field and use it as the primary permission check instead of verifying that the authenticated user owns the target record. This allows an attacker to set owner to their own user id and bypass ownership enforcement, enabling the addition of follow-up records to arbitrary customers, clues, or opportunities when the attacker knows the record identifier. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N) and independent CVSS 3.1 assessment confirm the attack requires low privileges and affects only integrity of follow-up records, with no impact on confidentiality or availability.

Know when Cordyscrm gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 4.3 MEDIUM

Network-reachable endpoints with low complexity but requiring a low-privileged account (PR:L); only record integrity is affected (I:L), with no confidentiality or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

CordysCRM through 1.9.3 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated users to skip permission checks by setting the owner field to their own user id. Attackers can send requests to the follow/record/add endpoints to add follow-up records and overwrite follow_time and follower on any known customer, clue or opportunity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 88% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source CRM from 1Panel-dev, limited enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy