Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessInstall malicious co-installed app on device
-
ExploitSocially engineer victim to open crafted PDF
-
ExecutionExploit incorrect authorization in Chrome PDF handling
-
ImpactExfiltrate sensitive information to attacker app
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a malicious application already co-installed on the same Android device as Google Chrome (versions prior to 155.0.8059.39), combined with social engineering to make the victim interact with a crafted PDF; the incorrect authorization (CWE-863) in Chrome's PDF handling then allows the co-installed app to read sensitive information. Limiting factors: this is effectively a local attack despite the AV:N notation - it cannot be performed purely remotely, it depends on the attacker getting a separate app onto the device, it requires victim interaction (social engineering, contradicting the input's UI:N), and impact is confined to confidentiality (no integrity or availability effect). These constraints, plus CISA SSVC Automatable=no, mean real-world exploitation is targeted and non-trivial. |
| Impact | The signals here point to a genuine but low-urgency issue rather than a top priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) yields 5.9 (Medium) and nominally describes an unauthenticated network attack, but this directly conflicts with the description, which characterizes a LOCAL attacker who must have a malicious app co-installed on the same Android device and must employ social engineering - i.e., the real vector is local with user interaction, not a clean remote exploit (verify vector with vendor; AV:N and UI:N appear to overstate reachability). CISA SSVC reinforces the low-urgency read: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified, so there is no evidence of active or opportunistic exploitation. The only serious dimension is confidentiality (C:H in the input, information disclosure of sensitive data), with no integrity or availability impact. Net: a legitimately patchable Medium-severity information-disclosure flaw that is hard to weaponize at scale (requires local app presence plus social engineering), so it should be remediated via normal Chrome update cadence rather than emergency patching. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker convinces an Android user to install a seemingly benign app that is co-installed alongside Chrome, then uses social engineering to get the victim to interact with a crafted PDF. The incorrect authorization in Chrome's PDF handling lets the co-installed app read sensitive information it should not be able to access. No public exploit code has been identified, and exploitation is not automatable (CISA SSVC: Automatable=no). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
Incorrect authorization in Google Chrome's built-in PDF handling on Android (versions prior to 155.0.8059.39) allows a malicious application already co-installed on the same device to obtain sensitive information after the victim is socially engineered into interacting with a crafted PDF. The issue is unauthenticated from a credentials standpoint (CVSS PR:N) but is effectively local in nature: it cannot be triggered purely remotely, it depends on the attacker first getting a separate app onto the device, it requires victim interaction, and its impact is confined to confidentiality with no integrity or availability effect. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA SSVC records Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, and Chromium rates the issue Medium severity; the signals point to a genuine but low-urgency issue rather than a top priority, though a vendor patch is available and should be applied through normal update cycles.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade Google Chrome on Android to version 155.0.8059.39 or later - the fixed build is distributed through Google Play and is documented in the Stable Channel Update at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_086471744.html, with technical details in the Chromium issue tracker at https://issues.chromium.org/issues/518091868. Because the flaw requires a second, attacker-controlled application to be co-installed on the device, the most effective compensating controls are those that shrink the app-install attack surface: enforce Google Play Protect and an MDM application allowlist so that only vetted apps can be sideloaded or installed, and review existing installations for untrusted or repackaged PDF-related apps, accepting the trade-off of reduced user flexibility and possible friction for legitimate enterprise apps. Organizations that cannot patch immediately can also reduce exposure by having Chrome hand PDF files to an isolated third-party viewer or by blocking in-browser PDF rendering via enterprise policy, though this degrades user experience and may break workflows that depend on Chrome's integrated PDF features, and it does not eliminate the underlying authorization defect. User training to avoid opening unsolicited PDFs addresses the social-engineering prerequisite, but no user-side configuration fully mitigates the issue - the only complete fix is updating to 155.0.8059.39 or later.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization), meaning Chrome's PDF component on Android fails to correctly enforce an authorization boundary when another application on the device interacts with its PDF functionality. Android's security model normally isolates applications from one another, so a defect that lets a co-installed app reach data exposed through Chrome's PDF surface represents a broken inter-app access-control check rather than a memory-safety bug. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is platform-agnostic and therefore over-broad; the authoritative affected platform here is Android, per the description and EUVD entry (Chrome versions before 155.0.8059.39). Note the scoring divergence: the supplied CVSS vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, 5.9) treats the attack as network-reachable with no user interaction, whereas the independent assessment re-scores it as CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, reflecting a local attack path that requires a co-installed application plus social engineering to induce the victim to open a crafted PDF. Both vectors agree on the confidentiality-only impact, which is consistent with the SSVC Technical Impact rating of partial and with the absence of any integrity or availability consequences.
Know when Android gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Requires a locally co-installed malicious app (AV:L) and social-engineered victim interaction (UI:R), needs no privileges (PR:N), and only discloses sensitive data (C:H, I/A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (Chrome).
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Incorrect authorization in PDF in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a local attacker leveraging social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a co-installed app. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in A
Android 3.0 through 4.1.x on Disney Mobile, eAccess, KDDI, NTT DOCOMO, SoftBank, and other devices does not properly imp
Integer overflow in the SampleTable::setSampleToChunkParams function in SampleTable.cpp in libstagefright in Android bef
Apktool versions 2.9.1 and prior contain a path traversal vulnerability when processing Android APK files. Malicious APK
An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Android system (art). Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Use-after-free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows
Android 1.6 Donut through 4.2 Jelly Bean does not properly check cryptographic signatures for applications, which allows
luni/src/main/java/java/io/ObjectInputStream.java in the java.io.ObjectInputStream implementation in Android before 5.0.
The Broadcom Wi-Fi driver in the kernel in Android 4.x before 4.4.4, 5.x before 5.1.1 LMY49G, and 6.x before 2016-02-01
EUVD-2026-93736
GHSA-4rjr-jwcj-94jx
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB