Skip to main content

TP-Link RE305 CVE-2026-102814

| EUVDEUVD-2026-111273 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-10-27 TPLink GHSA-7pqg-m5f8-c886
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: TPLink
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Join target local/Wi-Fi network
  2. Delivery
    Derive fixed TDDP v2 crypto key
  3. Exploit
    Forge authenticated TDDP v2 packet
  4. Execution
    Invoke privileged TDDP operation
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary commands as root

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the TP-Link TDDP v2 service to be running and reachable, and the attacker must be on the same local area network (CVSS AV:A, adjacent) as the RE305 V3 device. The core weakness is that TDDP v2 uses a fixed and derivable cryptographic key, letting an unauthenticated attacker (PR:N) forge valid protocol packets without credentials or user interaction. Exploitation is limited to attackers with local/adjacent network presence - it is not exploitable from the internet - and affects RE305 V3 firmware before 1.1.8 Build 20260921 Rel. 42853; updating to that firmware is the vendor-provided fix.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority issue rather than an inflated CVSS score, but its reach is bounded by the attack vector. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes an adjacent-network, low-complexity, unauthenticated attack with no user interaction and high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H), consistent with the stated outcome of root-level OS command execution via CWE-78. The constraining signal is AV:A: exploitation requires the attacker to already be on the same local network, so this is not a remotely internet-exploitable flaw and cannot be automated at internet scale against arbitrary targets. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or exploit/PoC reference is present in the supplied data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation; the vuln.today decision label is 'this_week' rather than act_now/emergency. Net: on a device an attacker can already reach on the LAN, impact is severe (root), but the adjacency requirement and absence of exploitation signals place this below internet-facing critical vulnerabilities.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has joined the same local network as a vulnerable RE305 V3 range extender (for example via the extended Wi-Fi) derives the fixed TDDP v2 cryptographic key and forges valid TDDP protocol packets to the running service. Those forged packets invoke privileged TDDP operations that reach OS command execution, giving the attacker arbitrary system commands as root on the device. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

Authentication bypass in the TDDP v2 service of the TP-Link RE305 V3 range extender lets an unauthenticated attacker on the same local network forge protocol packets using a fixed, derivable cryptographic key and reach privileged TDDP operations, including functionality that can result in operating-system command execution with root privileges. Only devices running RE305 V3 firmware before 1.1.8 Build 20260921 Rel. 42853 are affected, and exploitation requires the TDDP service to be running and reachable from the attacker's adjacent network segment (CVSS 4.0 8.7 / assessed CVSS 3.1 8.7, AV:A). A vendor patch is available and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; the priority label is this_week because the flaw yields full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact once an attacker has local network presence.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade RE305 V3 firmware to 1.1.8 Build 20260921 Rel. 42853 or later, available from the TP-Link download page at https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/download/re305/v3/#Firmware (EU mirror https://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/re305/v3/#Firmware), with the accompanying advisory at https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5362/. Because the flaw is reachable only by an attacker on the same local network while the TDDP service is running and accessible, interim risk reduction should focus on limiting that exposure: keep the extender on a trusted, segmented network rather than a shared or guest LAN, and restrict which hosts can reach the device's management/debug traffic until the firmware update is applied - these controls reduce opportunity only and do not remove the fixed-key weakness, so updating remains the complete fix per the vendor.

Affected VersionsENISA

RE305 v3 0 <1.1.8 Build 20260921 Rel. 42853

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is TDDP (TP-Link Device Debug Protocol) version 2, a debug/management protocol exposed by the RE305 V3 firmware. As described by the vendor and ENISA EUVD, TDDP v2 relies on a fixed and derivable cryptographic key rather than per-device or per-session secrets, so valid-looking protocol packets can be forged without credentials; the CVSS 4.0 vector confirms PR:N/UI:N and an adjacent attack vector (AV:A). The resulting weakness is classified CWE-78 (improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command), because crafted TDDP requests can reach privileged operations that ultimately execute system commands as root. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:tp-link_systems_inc.:re305_v3 scopes the issue to the RE305 V3 hardware revision; the trigger path beyond forged TDDP packets reaching command-executing functionality is not described in further detail in the available sources, and the flaw is not exploitable from the internet - it requires adjacency to the device's local network and the TDDP service to be running and accessible.

Know when Re305 V3 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (TPLink) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Adjacent LAN access required (AV:A), no credentials due to the derivable fixed key (PR:N), low complexity, and root command execution yields full C/I/A impact on the device.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (TPLink).

CVSS VectorVendor: TPLink

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

An authentication weakness exists in the TP-Link TDDP v2 service of TP-Link RE305 V3. TDDP v2 uses a fixed and derivable cryptographic key, which may allow an unauthenticated attacker on the same local network to forge protocol packets and access privileged TDDP operations, including functionality that can lead to operating-system command execution when the TDDP service is running and accessible.

Successful exploitation may allow an unauthenticated attacker on the same local area network to execute arbitrary system commands with root privileges.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

TP-Link RE305 V3 range extenders running firmware before 1.1.8 Build 20260921 Rel. 42853 contain an authentication bypass that allows an attacker on the same local network to gain root-level command execution. Devices are typically deployed in homes and branch offices, so a compromise could expose local traffic and provide a foothold for broader network intrusion. Leadership should prioritize patching because the flaw grants full control without requiring credentials.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 70% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular consumer brand but a single specific Wi-Fi extender model
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy